Jump to content

WLS 50 Greatest Soap Opera Couples of All-Time


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 215
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members
Posted

They also don't seem to realize that this type of writing makes many fans resent, and outright loathe, couples.

I also hate the idea that a couple must reunite, because of history, or as some type of sop. I don't think I've ever hated this more than Clint and Viki on OLTL, where I thought Viki lost a great deal of integrity by going anywhere near Clint in a way beyond pitying ex.

I thought it was interesting how GL and ATWT tried to split the difference with some of their defining couples. Josh and Reva reunited, but viewers knew Jeffrey was still alive, and Reva waited a year. Holden and Lily were hinted at reuniting in the future, but hadn't actually done so. I guess this was less about brave writing than about backstage personnel at that time not being too interested in these pairings.

  • Members
Posted

I'm very surprised to see Tom and Margo as the top couple from ATWT (so far). My top three would have been Holden/Lily, then Steve/Betsy, then Jack/Carly. I missed the days of Justin Deas' Tom, but I do remember Margaret Colin fondly. To me, though, the Hillary Smith/Gregg Marx pairing were Tom and Margo at their peak...such chemistry!

  • Members
Posted

Ugh...the couple I truly can't stand as the #1 ATWT couple???? HELL TO THE NO. I'm sorry....there ought to be some kind of "excessive recast" clause that throws them out of this race. 'Cause the Deas/Colin couple is worlds away from the Holmes/Dolan pairing.

I try to be open-minded---but let me repeat----HELL to the NO!

  • Members
Posted

This list sucks and I'm not surprised. How exactly can any couple that was hugely popular in the 80's (which was the golden age of soaps) be lower than those that came after the 80's? I certainly didn't expect anything though. I don't even know why they bother with stupid lists like these.

  • Members
Posted

It's interesting to hear from panels and so on, instead of just fan votes. I do agree that a lot of the more recent couples just can't compare.

As for Tom/Margo, I do think they belong on the list. Colin/Deas don't do a ton for me (mostly because they're both so OTT, especially Colin, who often seems like she's about to fly away in most of the ATWT work I've seen from her), but I really liked HBS/Marx and I thought Holmes and Dolan were very good in their first 4-5 or so years together. I'd definitely put them above Lily/Holden (never liked them) and Carly/Jack (who were crippled by years of bad writing), but not above Bob/Kim.

  • Members
Posted

ICAM! It stunned me to see such classic supercouples as AMC's Nina & Cliff and Greg & Jenny so low on this list. At this point, I expect the top 10 to include such awful pairings as AMC's Zach & Kendall and Ryan & Greenlee, GL's Danny & Michelle and OLTL's John & Natalie.

  • Members
Posted

Sad to say that I'm practically ATWT illiterate. Of the little that I know I'm not surprised to see Jack/Carly on that list but since they came on at the end of the 90's (if I'm not mistaken) I'm pretty sure just from what I've heard that there is plenty of great romances and couples that came before them.

Not to say that those after the 80's can't be on the list but top 20 or 30? Nah. I'm really tripping off the fact that Frisco & Felicia and Robert & Anna are below Sonny and Brenda. I'm also scratching my head over Robert & Holly not being on the list at all and that's just the GH side of things, so far. I wasn't watching in the 80's but I've been catching up with people who have and by watching old tapes and clips on youtube. I'm fairly certain that Robert & Holly were the supercouple more so than R&A.

I also don't get why Greg and Jenny are so low on the list and I don't think I saw Jesse and Angie at all. Like I said, I wasn't watching back then but when I started watching soaps in the early 00's I started researching the history of all the soaps I was watching and back then these couples and the people who played them were HUGE celebrities. They were get attacked by mobs everytime people saw them type celebrities. Their impact was much greater which qualifies them as being truer supercouples ( a term I think should've been retired in the 80's as it didn't really apply to anyone after) than many of the ones who have been placed higher on this list.

  • Members
Posted

Not saying that there aren't or weren't but supercouple to me implies many things to me (ie. popularity, cultural impact, ratings, story etc.). And no, not every couple from that era was good or any other era but they certainly qualify more than those that came after.

  • Members
Posted

Aww :(, I like Danny and Michelle but I still agree with what you're saying. None of those couples compare at all to the aforementioned in your post.

  • Members
Posted

They aren't done with the list yet. I hope that Angie and Jesse are still to come and I will be disappointed if they are not listed. That would be a major blunder omission.

  • Members
Posted

I love everything about this post. However, I do think Jesse & Angie will make the list. Truly, they are the first AA supercouple and transcend a lot of couples just because of that. Heck, Greg & Jenny were more popular than Jesse & Angie but I probably would put J&A above G&J. Other than that, I agree 100% with your post. Bravo.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


  • Recent Posts

    • I realize I harp on this, but I think he spending is relevant.  She's not just buying new wigs. She's building a mansion, she's funding a sports complex, she's paying for operations for people she doesn't know, she's caring for Peaches, she's buying apartments. We saw ?her get ONE check for ONE million dollars. That's it. I may be wrong, but I thought they said she'd get a payment every 6 months. Regardless, she could not rule the roost on $1M, and the show is not doing a good job there. Pretending that doesn't matter? I can't do that.  All they had to do was add a couple lines about payouts and payments.  In other news, I would love to know just how much Anita was putting into that trust as well as what investment got her what has to be an incredible return.

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • I'm honestly surprised Nikki and Victor have not divorced yet... maybe their brief opening of the marriage did something for them. 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • It reminded me of what the Pollocks got away with all the time on THE DOCTORS: long ass flashbacks that don't really add anything to the scene except time.  Because, if you remove the flashback, what's left?  Monica finishes packing Alan's suitcase.  The end. Oh, well.  At least I got to see a young Patricia Elliott (ex-Renee, OLTL) in that Aim toothpaste commercial (not to mention, a shirtless James O'Sullivan (ex-Jeff, AMC; ex-Pete, OLTL; ex-Jerry, SOMERSET) in the commercial for One-a-Day vitamins, lol).
    • Well, I can't help but think it would've been written different with CB still there
    • I could've sworn FV let other people direct either here or at OLTL. I may be wrong. IIRC Kimberly is now very active directing multi-cam/sitcom work. I'd forgotten she even did Netflix's One Day at a Time.
    • IIRC MVJ said the million was just the first piece of what Leslie got or was already owed, something they did make explicit in dialogue but not too explicit. Still, I am past worrying about it. I do think they want 30-yo elder millennial Peaches in her Sophia Petrillo wig to be a point of pathos for Leslie. In theory I am fine with that, and don't dislike Peaches despite the jarring physical disconnect and need for a recast lol. But I do think they do a lot of B&B-style whizzing from Point A to Point C with Leslie on this kind of stuff - in one scene she is raising hell, in the next she is weeping over Peaches. There's very little transition to that sometimes that allows for the nuance, and that can be done much better and they can go much deeper with Leslie (and most characters). The newer/younger audience for the show may have less issue with this kind of quick change than we do.
    • Please register in order to view this content

       Thank you.   That was part of my reasoning as well. I think about the days of Kevin, Joey, and Jessica on OLTL or Lucky/Liz/Nik/Sarah/Emily on GH or the Last Blast Kids on DAYS or the Glow by Jabot kids, and it takes me back. Sure I started soaps due to the older cast with their divas, but I do like to see people around my age back then, too. Great memories.   So I love a good relatable teen tale. Bullying. Hormones for the Bad Boy. College choices and internal conflict. 
    • Thank you for the information.  I did listen to the entire interview with Miss Roux -- way back when it was first released.  But I am unable to recall her mentioning Connie Ford, and don't have time nor effort to listen to the entire thing again, just for one small morsel. So again, thanks for responding.    I do recall Roux sounded extremely fragile and perhaps a bit wounded in the interview. I almost felt guilty for even listening to it.  So perhaps that has some influence on my reluctance to listen to it again.  She seemed troubled, to say the least.   
    • Boxer-briefs, huh?   Well...called it on Cane/Giggly Heffa hooking up so not surprised.
    • Do you have Addie’s first air date??
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy