Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Members

Eric, the fact of the matter is that you're not one who is suggesting that AMC and OLTL deserve "special" treatment that other soaps never got. However, I have been getting that vibe from others all along. (I not going to mention any names, because that will only make this thread more divisive.) As you stated, it's probably best I drop this specific issue and focus on other things (regarding the online venture).

I honestly never understood why ABC soap fans felt that their soaps were immune from cancellation just because they were network owned. (Network owned soaps were cancelled in the past, even on ABC.) I think that as you two suggested, fans just wanted to give themselves a false sense of security.

While I may be the only one here to believe this, I don't believe that going from six soaps to four is a bad thing for the genre. By contrast, keeping soaps around that are on their last legs is what is really hurting the genre (and that's why GH and DOOL need to be cancelled ASAP as well). There's no reason why the number of soaps on the air has to be four (or fewer); instead of spending time trying to extend the life of dying shows, folks should spend that energy convincing executives to launch new ones. (I've already explained in a new thread why now would be an ideal time to launch a new daytime soap.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 5.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

No one is suggesting anyone get special treatment. I think the vibe was different simply because P&G had slowly been disrespecting their soap line-up and wiping it out piece by piece for years, starting with AW. I remember that mess. The movement to save that show was loud, organized, apparently intelligent, and ultimately futile, because NBC and Susan Lee did not give a [!@#$%^&*]; they thought Reilly was the future. Then, first GL then ATWT were considered 'inevitable' by the time they got the axe, simply because of the drastic downturn in both quality and production values over the course of several interminable years. With ABC, I think the superficial veneers of quality of their soaps was either maintained or degraded so gradually by comparison to the P&G soaps, and their ouster so sudden and frankly short-sighted, that it came as a galvanizing shock to some people.

I don't see anything to apologize for. The two ABC soaps may or may not be revived; PP has them licensed for the next ten years. P&G has not handed its soaps over. I personally would love to see AW, ATWT and GL all revived in some form at some point; they were all once proud television institutions, and I think GL in particular is a fertile property that can be reinvented. But that's not happening right now. For OLTL and AMC, it might. I'm happy about that. I see no reason why my love for those shows and hopes for their future are in any way incongruous with how I grieved for other cancelled soaps. Yes, I'm sure to diehard fans of other lost soaps this potential revival of one show and not another seems unfair. And it is unfair. But that's life. We all live with it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Would have AMC and OLTL been cancelled if ATWT and GL were still on??

As much as I love ATWT ...I dont know if I would want it back on the air with the same hacks in charge. It wasn't much fun to watch. ATWT died with Douglas Marland. I'll be happy with continued ATWT DVD releases I can purchase.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I've seen the opposite - some type of pleasure that this fell through when the P&G soaps never had a chance. As someone who will always have more of an emotional connection to P&G soaps than to just about anything else on TV, it makes me sad, because the soap genre is something that should be mourned instead of being about one-upmanship.

I think the last year showed the potential, if they focused on Lucinda, Bob, Kim, etc. and some characters like Luke (although I know Luke became very divisive). But I agree never with Goutman or Passanante...I would say bring back Richard Culliton.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I've never seen anyone mocking the P&G soaps being denied a resurrection vis a vis AMC and OLTL, and I would decry it if I had. I have seen what Carl has, but I generally think it has less to do with the CBS soaps so much as just a bunch of bitter ex-ABC fangirls who feel vindicated after the loss of Couple X or Character Y from either show. "If I can't have this, I want them gone." Please.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Though there was some short-term heartbreak, I'm now glad ATWT was put out to pasture because its best days were well in the past. (This was also true for every other long-running soap that was cancelled before it.) I honestly believe that what's in the best interest for the Nixon soaps is for their fans to rally for classic reruns to air on television or be released on DVD (as opposed to pushing for new episodes produced with a shoe-string budget).

Vee, even though I disagree with much of what you have written, I must say that this is an extremely eloquent and thoughtful post.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I agree with this, especially in the case of GL. Now I feel that way about GH, which I have watched since my teens. I'm not sure there is anything left of GH to save. IMO, both AMC and OLTL have more life than GH, but then, I wasn't watching OLTL and AMC in their prime, so that may make a difference in how I see them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Nothing officially but before the deal was announced, series creator Mitch Hurwitz indicated that they were in talks with Netflix, Hulu, and Showtime to produce 9 or 10 new episodes.

No, AD is a SAG production and SAG has a comprehensive new media agreement with specific rules and clear residual provisions for online projects that earn money.

The soaps are covered by AFTRA, which only has contracts with some new media providers but not others. It's a piecemeal approach that makes things more complicated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Joel Crothers would have been perfect as Owen (maybe because Margo wasn't too far off Denise). A shame he couldn't have played a dual role. Eliot did have more room to grow. I wonder if whatever allegedly happened with Denny Albee played a part in both their exits.
    • Andre is the standout in the cast among the males when it comes to fashion.
    • Happy Mother's Day 2025! 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I remember Evie's last scene and it was in Justin Marler's house and she is telling them that Ben is asking for a reconciliation and she is going to join him. I always have wondered what Janet Grey did after leaving Guiding Light (I know from the interview with Kathleen Cullen that she did have a baby and they stayed in touch for awhile).
    • https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/may/11/trump-accept-luxury-plane-gift-qatar Donald Trump is reportedly ready to accept a luxury plane described to be a “palace in the sky” being offered to the US president as a gift from Qatar’s royal family, almost immediately igniting accusations of bribery and corruption as well as commensurate criticism. citing multiple sources familiar with the matter, ABC reported (link) that the Trump administration was preparing to accept a luxury Boeing 747-8, a jumbo jet from the Qatari royals that was estimated to be about $400m. Trump would then use the 13-year-old plane as the new Air Force One until shortly before the conclusion of his second Oval Office stint, at which point it would be transferred to his presidential library foundation no later than 1 January 2029. The luxury gift from Qatar is expected to be announced next week during Trump’s three-day tour of the Middle East that includes Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and Qatar, ABC reported. Trump toured the opulent plane in February while it was parked at the West Palm Beach international airport, ABC added. According to ABC’s sources, Trump’s attorney general Pam Bondi and his top White House lawyer David Warrington have pre-emptively concluded that it is “legally permissible” for Trump to accept the luxury gift and then transfer it over to his presidential library.
    • Yeah I’m confused how wearing baggier clothing wouldn’t just make him even smaller. I have no problem with his fashion at all. He’s a well put together man.
    • The problem is that foyer doesn't look like it has ANY connection to that garbage glitter trash living room at Bill and Hayley's. I have to disagree strongly with both of you on Andre's wardrobe. I like it -- a lot. I don't think anything about it is dated, but that he looks like a guy who cares about fashion. Andre is a short king, but I don't want to see him lost in baggy clothes or chunky sweaters.
    • On rumble, shallotpeel, the following video titles:  GH 2-17-21 Denise Alexander's last appearance GH 3-30-1979 Denise Alexander Edit  GH 11-2-2006 Laura's Story Full Episode GH 11-2-2006 Denise Alexander Edit GH 12-18-80 Denise Alexander Edit GH 8-18-80 Denise Alexander Edit GH 7-19-2013 Denise Alexander Edit 1995 Daytime Emmys Special pre-show on E! Arrivals, etc.  Hosts: Shelly Morgan Taylor &  Charles Perez Frequent Commentators: Mimi Torchin & Tom O'Neill Sightings: Linda Dano & her husband Frank, Peggy McCay, Vicki Lawrence, Peter Bergman, Dano again, a BTS pre-produced segment, Keith Hamilton Cobb, Bryan Buffington & Rachel Miner together, Ric Hearst, Maura West with Shawn Christian & Yvonne Perry (a 3-some from ATWT), a segment on non-televised awards given out last week, Ian Buchanan with Finola Hughes
    • Apologies if this has been posted, but Kristen Meadows in an ad for the earliest version of talk to text technology.

      Please register in order to view this content

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy