Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Members

Lisa. Victor. Reva. But that's just off the top of my head.

As someone said, GUIDING LIGHT's cancellation might have been a mercy killing, but AS THE WORLD TURNS's was murder.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 5.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I don't think that PP favored the Nixon soaps over the P&G ones (or had any special emotional connection to them). Based on how disorganized the company has handled things, it's obvious that PP never originally had any intention of saving any soap. However, the PP executives saw the huge outrage that the AMC & OLTL cancellations caused, and then felt it might be wise to acquire many of these disgruntled viewers by (briefly) continuing to air these soaps on their start-up network. (If a similar s#itstorm had erupted after the P&G soaps were cancelled--with many fans saying that this was television's darkest day, going out and buying Hoovers, and trashing Oprah for being "heartless" because she refused to acquire a couple of dying soaps--then the leaders of PP would have probably bought the rights to the P&G soaps.)

Kyle, thank you for answering my quesiton based on the merits. However, the character of Lisa was just as important as Erica or Luke ever was; that character (and the buzz created by her and Bob's relationship) was responsible for the explosion in the genre's popularity, and also served as the prototypes for both Rachel and Erica. Also, I seem to recall that Reva generated as much buzz as Viki did.

When it comes to "socially relevant" storylines, ATWT was the first soap to do a gay storyline, AW was the first soap where a character had an abortion (something few seem to know about given all the "hoopla" over Erica's abortion) as well as the first to do an AIDS storyline, and GL was the first soap to do a cancer storyline. I honestly believe that the "more socially relevant" reputation the ABC soaps have is largely due to the soap elitists (who ran/run the Emmys) who fawned all over AMC & GH. (When it comes to getting the recognition it deserves, OLTL is almost as badly ignored as the P&G soaps were.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Saw this on We Love Soaps:

Would You Watch An ALL MY CHILDREN Web Show? Prospect Park Is Betting On It

"Soap actors can create blogs, use social media, or create videos, which they didn't do on mainstream TV," says Susan Miller, executive producer of the award-winning web series ANYONE BUT ME. The sense of intimacy will have fans asking, "Susan Lucci who?"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think it's undeniable--historically pre 1980s. Sorry--but all the soap press at the time--think late 70s, complains how the PGP soaps still were afraid to have other races (one exec at ATWT in a soap book I have says that there's nothing they can do, when they ty Black characters ratings fall--this was from 1977). Bell at DAYS and Y&R much less so.

AW had an ILLEGAL abortion--as did several soaps I believe, Erica's is famous for the first legal one on TV, primetime or daytime. That's the hooplah.

When Agnes Nixon was writing AW and OLTL for a few months at the same time she mentioned that PGP refused to allow her to have two friends, a black character and a white one (both women) become roomates as "immoral"--OLTL had no such issues with OLTL (as they were desperate to have a hit, and a younger targeted show). Loving was the first show to have an AIDS storyline way back in 1983--before it was addressed on primetime tv, although ATWT tackled it more comprehensively. AMC had a lesbian storyline which was actually pretty major in 1983 as well (they planned on a ga male storyline but ABC wouldn't allow them to as they had a gay male on Dynasty--weird politics). Same year Loving had the first incest story.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Oh, good, the "Agnes Nixon abandoned OLTL" meme again. This never gets old. Excuse me, I have to go shoot myself in the face.

I wouldn't take that podcast - or La Ilene, really - as a font of reliable information.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I agree. Especially after SilkPress got back to her apartment and started to mock Nicole. Her dislike for Nicole and seeing her as a threat to her getting Teddy Bear is growing worse. So I could see her pulling a kidnapping on Nicole at some point. If anything she was going there to poke the bear and got pressed (pun unintended) when the bear gathered her.   Completely understandable. 
    • Beyond The Underwear Oops I mean Gates!

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I swear this entire time I thought Roman knew about the Phillip/Vivian letter lol.  I do like how mature Roman/Kate are as a couple.  It makes me sad the new writers never got a chance to write for John/Marlena. I agree with @AbcNbc247 that the Felicity stuff is a bit after school special-y.  I am pretty sure that (most) of the viewing audience is aware that a grown man should not be shouting at any teenage girl especially one with disabilities.  Just let Xander apologize and move on. Linsey Godfrey was in her Sarah baby voice mode today and it irritates me to no end.   I know it's a cutesy thing her and Xander do but it's annoying. Bringing Kevin back is strange, but I do like the use of history.  I do think Rex probably could have been used instead, but whatever.  I don't care about Rex much either lol.
    • I mean over the past decades. But I do agree that in recent years now, the writing is not working for them as well as it used to then. It's same old, same old...which is what made the Damian storyline refreshing. At least for me.   
    • Did Denise give any interviews where she talked about her first few years on GH... '73-75? I wonder if she had any regrets leaving Days for GH, as from what I've read, the show was in the dumps writing-wise, so am thinking she didn't have great story? Any Leslie story highlights I've seen always start with '76, after Gloria Monty took charge.
    • I know! It's like second verse, here we go again!  Agreed. Certainly there was concern maybe even fear at the highest levels for the very good reason that what they had was so economically successful, so of course this risk was scary but if anyone was brave she was. Yes, he was. I have seen her associated with getting it on the air one other place but no details nor official title. Not the writer or creator so it made me wonder if she functioned as a kind of uncredited ad hoc producer, but then maybe she just supported it. At any rate that is nothing but supposition on my part. No data! Yes, not a surprise anymore but still so frustrating! On one hand I am appreciative that she is included in this book, but scholarship where are you?!
    • that wasnt her point. She wanted to further demonize Ted; that was the main focus of their talk. She wants to ensure that Nicole leaves him so that he's free and single to be with her. At this point, I dont think she really cares what Nicole thinks of her; she just wants her out of the way Eva is Nicole's stepdaughter and is a Dupree by association. If Nicole takes Ted back then its reasonable that she would accept his daughter and i that happens, Eva will have welcomed to their country club, be invited to their parties, have access to their resources, etc....much like Andre whom also isnt a blood Dupree but is accepted by them via Nicole. Eva got what she got from Anita bc of Hayley. I think its important to remember that context bc they just dealt with an interloper that infiltrated their ranks and hurt her daughter in the worse way. Now you have another unfortunate girl positioned to do the same to her other daughter. The feelings are still too fresh and she doesnt want Eva to get the idea that she would ever be allowed the opportunity to play them again
    • Oh I've seem this! That's part of why I'm curious! The show could put EastEnders to shame on the gangster Aspect! Oh I've seem this! That's part of why I'm curious! The show could put EastEnders to shame on the gangster Aspect!
    • Eve was one of those characters that had the "Jessie Brewer"role. They had heavy storyline, they burned through it and now they are there for support and a touchstone in the community (Marland wanted to give Jessie story, but I agree with Monty...she best served in her connecting role, and keeping that damn Amy Vining busy so she keeps her nose out of things) So charcters are important and why they should have kept characters like Bridget around (even as she is more volatiles then Eve) who didnt need a big storyline but could have been behind the bar making connections and expostion, but Rauch wanted JEVA/JEVA/JEVA and DRAMA (which to him meant a lot of yelling and stupidity.)
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy