Jump to content

As The World Turns Discussion Thread


edgeofnik

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 17.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • DRW50

    2970

  • DramatistDreamer

    1958

  • Soapsuds

    1716

  • P.J.

    823

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

@DRW50 thanks so much for this - such a treat to see a scene like that! And you’re right - how long did Kim have that hair??

On a different note, I’ve been making my way through the early 90s episodes currently online, and have made it to 1995 where Carly has shown up in town! And it’s weird seeing the juxtaposition of the more recent characters like Carly with the earlier brigade.

I mean, it was a shock to me to see scenes between Carly and Andy (although I will say that Andy seemed to clock onto Carly very early on). Even seeing her interact with characters like Connor, Evan, Scott Eldridge… she had smokin’ hot chemistry with Evan #1 (Greg Watkins). Maura West at that time was an absolute revelation in what seemed to be a sea of dullness - indeed, Carly was the best thing to have happened to the character of Rosanna Cabot!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Thanks. Sorry for not tagging you.

I remember at the time wondering if Carly might sleep with Andy as that would have been a believable step in her plan to get Mike, given that he was Mike's good friend. One of the reasons that I was and still am so annoyed at Andy's firing in 1995 is that he was pretty well-integrated in the canvas, even with his closest partners all gone.

There were so many places to go with Carly in that original run, although I think Maura was right to leave at the time given that she was having a baby and the show had had her have a miscarriage while pregnant in real life, which I hate.

(I am not saying that's why she left - I assume she just wanted to focus on being a mother)

Edited by DRW50
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

As far back as I can recall, I have loved this scene, which I have often called it: Iva With Pitchfork. That says it all, right? However, I have just had the pleasure of creating my own edit of this scene & I found more there, so now I have created, from scratch, "Iva With Pitchfork, Long Form." Let me know what you think of it.

One more thing: watching the entire episode I was reminded of what a giant ATWT really was,  telling A, B & C storylines flawlessly. It makes me furious that CBS mandated a change. Let's call it "pod" storytelling. UGH.

https:// R*** .com/v5fwo71-atwt-iva-pitchfork-long-form.html

Or alternately here:

https://www.facebook.com/groups/soapthegoodthebadtheugly/?multi_permalinks=3843838205934717&notif_id=1727012491808450&notif_t=feedback_reaction_generic&ref=notif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

In Lynn Liccardo's book she talks about CBS mandating the so-called new production model for Guiding Light and a new narrative style for ATWT. She dubs that new narrative style "pod storytelling" where they completely abandoned their traditional "weave a tapestry" narrative style in favor of stories where individual characters, or couples, were as isolated as possible from everyone else!!! IOW, each character, or couple, existed only in their own little 'pod.'  Another way to put it might be that people stay in their own lane. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Why do it, yes, that is the #1 question. If we ask oh maybe someone like me, I might reply that CBS did it out of the sheer stupidity of being able to do it. IOW, power. In this scenario it is imagined that CBS wanted P&G in a position where they would have power over them. They publicly announced in 1995 that they wanted Bill Bell to create a brand new soap for them to replace Guiding Light. P&G went to bat for their soaps, verbally, and so CBS "backed off" when P&G said, basically, "We'll do anything, just please, don't cancel us." And, it seems to me that was what the point was, all along. CBS wanted P&G to say "Uncle". They waited until some P&G veterans, retired, to pull this stunt. BTW, Bill Bell wanted nothing to do with any of it. But, this to me, was the set-up for the whole effing last years of these two venerable "Chantilly" soaps. I happen to have a deep & abiding love & respect for GL & ATWT & I think, I mean it is my opinion, that it was CBS BTS pulling strings till the whole damn structure ... collapsed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It was all about money and running an efficient production schedule (again, money). During that "pod" era (and even to this day on the surviving soaps) a typical episode usually consisted of scenes that had only two characters.  For instance, if Jack and Carly were having a conflict, their argument/dialogue would be stretched/padded so that it lasted for 5/6 separate scenes.  Those scenes were interspersed throughout the episode with 5/6 separate scenes of Bob and Kim dealing with a conflict, and 5/6 scenes of Barbara and Hal, etc.  Each episode was therefore cheaper to produce because they only had to pay 8 to 10 actors.  And the unionized technical crew no longer could charge for overtime because they were no longer filming beyond the regular working hours (wedding scenes, birthday parties, etc. would often film late into the night.)  It certainly was an efficient business model but it made for very boring, inert, vapid viewing experience.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Thanks...and yes, it did make for very boring viewing...could care less about Jack and Carly so you are stuck having them talk endlessly...(and remember when they used to make fun of the old days when people were in a kitchen chatting over coffee, where we were right back there, but I could care less about two middle aged people acting like teenagers and talking bout breaking up, making up, etc..

 

Lord, I will never forgive that woman for foisting her friend, Whatshisface to play NuDylan. You should also check out her Linkedin page...for a "creative narration expert," its a whole lot of verbage that says nothing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't remember..he just came back after apparently dumping Bridget, to be MADLY in love with Harley, even though he never was in the past. I just always thought that Brian whatever his name is just looked like a doufas! But I have a love for RealDylan..who I know was not the greatest actor, but he had a sweetness about him that really sold that his blond muscle boy would be protective, appreciate and in love with someone like Bridget. And yes, I know it makes no sense that the kid of Reva and Billy would be this mellow nice guy but it worked.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I don't think Lois the character was there.  The Lois we knew from the 90s has pretty much died with this  Gio story crap.
    • Have to agree re MM. The goody two shoes character and writing doesn't help but maybe a more dynamic actor would help Brandon lift his game also. I found the song sequence a little OTT. First of all it should have been shorter and maybe the song fades out and just some music to accompany the montage. I think it would have worked better if Anita had have been alone after everyone left and started tinkling leading into the song, with Vernon coming in observing and then joining her for  a close moment. Everyone standing around felt a little too much. And that closing effect with the two blackscreens meeting was unnecessary. Just a fade out would have been enough.
    • HUGE THANK YOU FOR 1998-1999 EPISODES!!!

      Please register in order to view this content

      Please register in order to view this content

         
    • And sadly I think that’s the trivia Both Jeanne Cooper and Eric Braeden went with for years and years. Lol
    • But people were hating so bad on amc and the final year and the ratings sucked. Business wise they made the right call. Oltl who even gained some ratings back and weren’t they higher as GH at one point is a decision and never understood. 
    • Ann Williams was the first Maggie Powers on The Doctors but left to have a baby. Maggie was successfully recast so Ann picked up the role of Eunice (Jo's sister on Search for Tomorrow) and played that role for 10 years before being killed of in 1976. That led to her role of Margo on EON.
    • Looking at those totals it seems most contract actors are on a 1 or 2 week average guarantee. I assume contracts are still operating on 13 week cycles so you would have to know the particular actors contract starting date to work out their guarantee. The question remains as to what actors listed as contract are actually recurring? Bryton ?
    • Yep, that scene was at the conclusion of the Derek Thurston vs George Packard storyline, when Kay decided neither of them should run Chancellor.  By the time she put Victor in charge, Victor had been on the show for months & months with his Rolls Royce, his ranch, and Newman Enterprises.  SONY released some Y&R "trivia cards" in the late 1980s, and one of the questions was "who brought Victor Newman to Genoa City?" The answer on the back of the card is "Kay Thurston, to run Chancellor Industries", and it's a wrong answer lol.    
    • I think someone said it did exist, but I can't remember.
    • The bit with the scarf reminds me of the fabled stuffed animal scene with Rick and Phillip. (That wasn't debunked, was it?)
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy