Jump to content

Y&R: Discussion for the Week December 7


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 141
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

The awful Teresa Zimmerman. A lot of her scripts have been consistently awful lately.

I'm glad others are starting to notice the crappy day to day and overall crappy dialogue writing on Y&R.

I'm not feeling this Tucker character. When you build a new character, you're supposed to make sure there's something worth investing in and lace it with some defined intrigue. I find Tucker boring, and nothing about him intrigues me. I'm also finding William Russ quite boring and bland thus far. The sad thing is, I knew he's a pet of this writing team, and they will be shoving him down out throats, no matter how developed (or non-developed) he is as a character.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

How are people feeling about Mac just curious(Clementine Ford). I still think the actress is horribly miscast and I thought CF was really decent on The L Word so it has nothing to do with acting ability. She's just so deadpan and bland. Mac is supposed to be the noble honorable sweet character I wish they'd cast her with someone that seems to have some natural sweetness and charm on screen. Y&R used to be very good I felt at one time at fixing casting issues. I guess they don't feel like this is an issue.

Secondly I have about had it with how they have written Phyllis. I used to be such a fan of this character. Don't get me wrong, I think think MS is a terrific actress, but it's like everything that I ever enjoyed about her character has been sucked away and/or dulled down with Nick. I hate the pairing with a passion for that reason especially.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I thought Clementine was beginning to find her groove, but that evaporated quickly. The writing for Mac has been directionless since she returned, they have no idea what do with her. Forcing her into this LAME surrogacy story is another thing in the long list of misfires with this character since she came back.

Also, it doesn't help that Clementine has no chemistry with anyone on the show. Not with Billy Miller, not with Jeanne Cooper, not with anyone.

I wish they'd recast or send Mac out of town again. Better yet, I wish they'd recast and get a better writing team to write for all the characters on this show.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrator

The more Tucker is on the more the business story is going to be on and the more Jill and Katherine are going to be on. So I say bring it. This is the most watchable thing about Y&R right now. I can't wait to see when Tucker goes after the company (at least I hope that happens).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Mac is supposed to be sullen and low key. If that's deadpan, then so be it. AshBash's Mac was the same way.. I liked it because it was something DIFFERENT. This show has enough scenery-chewing actors.... Stafford, Muhney, Chapman, Leblanc and his jazz hands.. Frantz and her hysterics, this show NEEDS a low key character or two to provide balance, or else you have a cast full of circus freaks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I thought her Mac had more of a sweetness about her underneath that seemed to shine through the low key portrayal. Plus she seemed to integrate much better into the canvas and had chem with a lot of actors on the show. I think the writing is partially to blame but how can you cast someone as Mac who has zero chemistry with her alleged true love Billy and Katherine.

Need I ask?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Ashley Bashioum could actually act. She brought it in scenes when she had to be a bitch opposite Jill, Brittany or Colleen. She actually has sex appeal, an edge and wasn't just Saint!Mac. Firing her when she returned was a huge, huge mistake. She had amazing chemistry with Kevin and could've saved that character from the nightmare he's been in since. She had chemistry with Daniel and I think she'd be more believable making mistakes and being a real soap character. I certainly don't think her Mac would have anything to do with a loser like Lily.

ETA:

I'm catching up on Y&R and nothing is sacred anymore! Even Heather's glorious long golden brown locks look like [!@#$%^&*]. Who did this to her?! It is another attempt to make us hate this potentially ratings gold character? Makes me so sad. Heather is the future of Y&R! No I'm not crazy either. I think she could fill the void Lauralee Bell left while being more interesting. She can be business sexy, a little bitchy and you can put her with any man on the show and it'll work. They need to strip her clothes off and get at it. I'd rather they attempt something with her over duds like Amber, Jana, even Phyllis and Sharon at this point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The way the show is now produced, I don't believe they have any real ability to make any legacy characters or to write for interesting or watchable heroines, or couples, or much of anything. The whole show is so incredibly empty. No one seems to care.

I guess that's not being fair but when I see plot points about Phyllis rooting around trash dumps, I don't know how else to respond.

That whole story is just an awful mess. Do they ever sit around and ask themselves what this story is about? If they don't, then they should, because I don't know if any viewers can tell them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I think they’re desperately trying to cover his awful tattoos. But anyway them being unable to style short kings properly has been a major pet peeve of mine for a while now.  I honestly don’t understand what some people expect from actors to even begin considering them for recognition. Let’s be real—awards mostly mean that an actor is respected by their peers and has some level of cultural relevance. Actual judgment on the acting itself? That’s often secondary—highly subjective and shaped by the times. I completely agree on both points. If you’re an actor or a dancer you shouldn’t get any tattoos (sorry not sorry). Tomas’ tattoos are ugly too. And regarding the couples- you’re completely right. These writers are unable to write romance.   Further comments: - Kat cannot be this dumb to keep tampering with evidence over and over again. And I’m officially not a fan of the actress—every time she’s in a scene with Leslie, she doesn’t seem intimidated at all. She plays it like comic relief, which is just too much, especially when paired with Leslie’s histrionics and over-the-top antics. Leslie is older, dangerous, and has literally been portrayed as homicidal—Kat should be at least a little scared. • I also didn’t like Kat playing damsel in distress with the hotel manager. It gave off the same weird energy as Dani with the cop. I would’ve much preferred the version Paul Raven suggested, with her sneaking in through housekeeping. • And yes, Dani again accused Hayley of faking the pregnancy—this time even specifying she might be using a pillow under her shirt. (No fake miscarriage being mentioned) I stand by my take: this is ridiculous writing. No one in the real world—except us, the chronically online soap watchers—would even think of such a conspiracy theory. Haley is no Beyoncé. • What in the world was Chelsea wearing in her hair the other day? And this whole thing with Madison is beyond cringe. Chelsea’s coming off as needy and toxic—basically like every other Dupree. • I’m glad the casino storyline is moving forward, but it’s still boring as hell. Honestly, I’d be so here for a plot twist where Vanessa and Doug take Joey out. • The direction and editing lately have been rough. Abrupt cuts, weird pacing… something just feels off overall. There’s a strange uneasiness to how it’s all coming together. • And finally: Tomas is too much of a saint. Where are the messy sluts when you need them? (Vanessa doesn’t count.)
    • Andrew sure has hard nips.
    • I was watching some August 1987 episodes and they brought back so many memories. I had some thoughts: Lisa and Jamie were so dull. Lisa was such a nothing character. It boggles my mind that so much story was centered around her in such a short amount of time. Joanna Going is a talented actress, but the material was just not there.  It was so good to see Wallingford and Mitch again. I know there was talk about Felicia a while back, but these episodes reminded me how integral Felicia was for the show.  Sally Spencer was done so dirty. She is turning in superb performances in an icky storyline. I wish she had stuck around longer. She has chemistry with everyone. The McKinnons should have lasted longer. Spencer had some strong stuff with Stephen Schnetzer and Mary Alexander. AW waster such a talented actress by getting rid of her. Justice for Cheryl too. I also missed Ed Fry when he left. Sandra Ferguson was a star from the moment she came on. She was charismatic and just popped. She had immediate chemistry with RKK and blended in well with Wyndham and Watson. I'd forgotten about the teenage Matthew.  I have no memory of Peggy Lazarus. She must not have lasted long. Was the original plan for John that he was going to turn out to be the twins' real father?      
    • If the new and improved copies that @rsclassicfanforever has uploaded can be manually moved into the "by month, by year" folders, that would be awesome. I personally don't think it's necessary to keep the older versions (which either have Dutch subtitles hard coded on them, or are lesser in picture quality). That's a lot of valuable drive space that could be cleared. Just my view but can appreciate others may feel differently. The structure had been by month by year previously, so I think it would be easier to conform to that, where so much prior work to get it to that format has already been done. Hopefully you can "drag and drop" so the new copies are in the right month/year? Re Clips, I never look at them now we pretty much have the episodes in full. Appreciate others may use, however. Thanks for all your hard work here @BoldRestless!
    • Oh yes defintely, Josh Griffith repeats and repeats the same storylines.
    • Isnt’t this storyline similar to the Cameron Kirsten situation though? Sharon thought she killed him. He ended up being alive and Sharon was being tormented with thinking she was seeing his face everywhere and that’s how we got that iconic scene with her and Nikki in the sewers.   I understand in Mariah’s case this is different circumstances but it does seem like a play on that whole thing. Maybe I’m wrong. I just wish if they were going to make any character follow in Sharon’s foot steps it would be Faith. Mariah wasn’t even raised by her, and her personality is different. I would expect her to take a different path. I understand I could be completely jumping ahead because the storyline hasn’t even played out yet but we’ll see. 
    • Thanks again @Paul Raven Monica was completely without redeeming qualities at this point. I always found the whole Monica = Carly narrative regressive, as I don't think shows comparing characters so heavily is ever a great idea, but she's actually worse than Carly was. Was it the Pollocks who had Leslie have a miscarriage?  Giving her a child, especially by rape, was not a good idea, but a part of me wishes they'd committed to it just to see what story it might have had in later years.
    • @janea4old Your detailed explanation and delving into the psychology and motivations is no doubt the opposite of what we will see onscreeen. As @ranger1rg stated we will get a few scenes and some sketchy explanations. Like the adoption of Aria, most of it will take place off screen.
    • I'm suddenly fearful that DAYS is going to pull a Flowers-for-Algernon stunt and Bo's progress will be reversed.  While @te. is stuck on Abe's tiny bedroom, I can't stop thinking of the size of Bo's huge hospital room.
    • Okay, why are Paulina and Abe sleeping like that?!  I'd take a screen grab if I wasn't lazy, but come on.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy