Jump to content

Guiding Light discussion thread


Recommended Posts

  • Members

 

I realize this isn't quite the same thing, but I always experience similar feelings whenever I see actors like Susan Lucci praising Agnes Nixon (even though she didn't have anything to do with it) for writing the original story that introduced Erica's never-before-heard-of daughter, Kendall, on AMC; or DAYS' Deidre Hall going on and on about the "delicious" material HW's such as James E. Reilly and Ann Marcus have given her and her character to play.  (In case non-DAYS fans are reading: Reilly had Dr. Marlena Evans possessed by the devil, and Marcus had Marlena's twin sister kidnap her and take over her life while Marlena languished in a mental institution -- two stories (out of many) that longtime DAYS fans probably wish had never happened.)

 

"Well, I'm glad YOU had some fun with it," I always say, "but those of us out here who grew up with these shows and these characters and know what they would and would not do better than they probably know themselves?  Not so much."

Edited by Khan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 12.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

 

Personally, I think it was either David Kreizman or Jill Lorie Hurst.  Someone who knew enough about GL's history, or at least had read all the coffee table books enough times to be able to rehash it all for MAC.

 

At the time, I was active on several soaps-related boards; and on at least one of those boards, an insider (unidentified, but someone who was credible) revealed how Weston never played as much of a part in the writing as fans had been led to believe.  Even the stuff that HAD originated from her was sketchy, leaving her team of breakdown writers with the task of connecting all the dots and filling in the blank spaces (sound familiar, Dena Higley haters?).  Which is why, to this day, I defy anyone to make sense of Brad and Marie Green, or the Antimonious [!@#$%^&*].

Edited by Khan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

I'll say this much: Weston might've had the idea to tie those five men into some "Ghost Story"-esque plot.  But that's all she probably had: a one-liner, based on a movie she remembered from years ago.  The actual blood-and-guts of the story, the parts that seemed to come from the previous tales, came from Kreizman and Hurst -- and probably because, they couldn't think of any other way to make it work.

Edited by Khan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Remember when Kreizman and Ellen Wheeler finally decided to kill off Roger Thorpe?  People think Peter Simon's (Ed) refusal to return to the show in 2004 is why Kreizman's alleged big storyline for Blake, Holly and Sebastian tanked.  But even if PS had returned, does anyone really believe that a story that is supposed to tie up over three decades of history for Roger's ex-wife, daughter and nemesis, but somehow becomes all about Tony and Michelle and Michelle sucking some poison out of Tony's bare chest in the jungles of Santo Domingo will turn out to be anything but a dud?

 

To me, Gus and Harley's non-wedding and the start of "Spaulding BAD, Cooper GOOD" sentiment was the warning sign that Kreizman would be a terrible HW.  But the Blake/Holly/Sebastian/Tony/Michelle mess...?  That told me David Kreizman (and Ellen Wheeler) would be the one to trip over the cord and accidentally pull the plug on GL's life support machine.

Edited by Khan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Interesting point.

 

I guess we have to acknowledge that many actors view their characters and stories very differently than viewers.

 

What might be challenging and interesting for them to play may not please many fans.

 

A lot of actors don't watch their own show and have no idea of how things come across onscreen and as part of the whole picture.

 

eg On Y&R Jess Walton loves working with Tristan Rogers and that's great but the Jill/Colin pairing and stories are awful

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

"Best" part of all, though, was that even GL itself couldn't decide WHEN the events leading up to Maryanne's death had occurred.  Supposedly, she died in 1977 -- at a time, I should add, when neither the Lewises nor the Coopers were visible, and when Alan and Ed WERE visible and heavily involved in story -- but different characters kept saying it happened over 30 years ago.  (Ellen Weston was HW from 2003-04.  So, you do the math.)  Moreover, even though the mess allegedly occurred in the late '70's, flashbacks to the night in question, as well as some weird sequence involving Marah, Marina, Michelle and their respective love interests, made it seem as if the murder had, in fact, occurred back in the '20's.

 

And then there were the whispers that Carrie Nye was hired not to play Maryanne's sister, but Maryanne herself, back from the dead and out for revenge.  Which might sound awesome, except, at age 67, she was seven years older than Peter Simon, the oldest of the five actors at the center of the story, and looked even older than that.

 

Honestly, it would have been more believable just to resurrect Susan Piper.

 

And I'd believe it.  Apparently, Conboy and Weston go way back -- back, at least, to when he hired her to play Suzanne Lynch on Y&R -- so it would not surprise me to hear that the two cooked up the initial idea for MAC.

Edited by Khan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

For a long time, I defended Ellen Weston's work. I didn't think it was wonderful, but I didn't find it nearly as offensive as others. 

 

The Ben Reade stuff was highly melodramatic, which I do see now was out of tone with what the show typically did. I was more offended by the fans that said there was no way Ben Reade could have been molested because he had a father like Fletcher who would have known something was going on. Now, I can see why people would be upset that Ben, who they watched grew up, was a serial killer and there seemed to be a tacked on excuse that he was sexually abused. The abuse angle didn't bother me because I felt it explained some of Ben's sexual hang ups (the initial Marah plotline, the escort service). It wasn't handled with an ounce of sensitivity. I did like how Michelle and Bill were working on creating a hotline for troubled youth because of what happened to Ben, but that wasn't really featured a lot.  

 

I also find it odd that the show wrote it like Ben killed himself, but the scene was staged as if he was trying to kill Marina and had failed. Of course, then the show had Lizzie try and end her life... 

 

Trying to create a timeline for the Maryanne Carrouthers storyline was foolish as was the story idea itself. I did like that the show had an actual storyline. Often, Weston's work was just a bunch of vignettes that sometimes would, but mostly wouldn't, lead to short story arcs. There were things I liked: the introduction of Gus' mother, the C-storyline where the younger set was involved in a staging of Romeo & Juliet, and Olivia's lie about baby Emma. Rewatching clips of the Olivia story, I can see how the motivation, plotting, and individual writing was so much stronger once Conboy was out the door and Wheeler arrived. It's really a shame that the level of writing couldn't be maintained after Kriezman took over. 

 

Kriezman's problem was he bought into the hype too quickly. Tammy and Jonathan's initial story was fascinating, dark, and twisted. What followed was generic and basic. They really needed to address Jonathan's problematic history with Tammy rather than to sweep it under the rug. It didn't help when they just started throwing basic tropes at them (the crazy boyfriend, the meddling mother). I think the story where Lizzie got pregnant by Jonathan had the ability to be a bigger story, but the show catered too much to Tom Pelphrey and his constant comings and goings. I thought Jonathan keeping Sarah from Lizzie was atrocious, and I couldn't stand Marcy Rylan's interpretation. 

 

The Sebastian story had the ability to work, and I loved Doug Hutchison in that role. It's a shame that DH has made the life choices that he has made since leaving the show. I never understood the whole "We're scrapping it because PS won't come back." Simon may have been a wonderful actor, but he was hardly irreplaceable. The bigger issue was that Wheeler was producing a show with actors she couldn't afford to pay. Instead of trying to give Rick, Beth, Blake, and Mel stories once a month, I think someone should have made an investments in characters they could afford and that were interesting. So much of Kriezman/Wheeler was just so vanilla and lifeless or insane and over the top. 

 

Despite the ups and the downs, I found most of 2004 entertaining, but things just went off the rails by January 2005 for me when they basically decided to reshuffle the deck and drop stories and develop new ones. By the summer, I was fed up with the lame reveal to Phillip's murder, the pointless Harley in prison / Harley and Gus on the run storyline, and the decision to commit to Jonathan and Tammy as endgame without presenting a redemption storyline or treating their romance like the toxic relationship it was. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy