Jump to content

The Tracy Quartermaine Lovefest


razor32always

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 30.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • hookedongh

    6312

  • remos

    4086

  • Ms. Quartermaine

    3372

  • ILoveTracyQ

    1894

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

Well I hope the LuNacy breaks up spoiler is false. I don't want them to have any more angst. They have angst everytime he leaves, or at least she does, and I'm tired of it. People might be tired of seeing them lovey-dovey, but the prob is, that's all they are getting. They are not giving them team scheme storylines like they should be. They were somewhat lovey dovey after last Feb sweeps, and became VERY lovey dovey since his return in October. We've only gotten 2 months of decent closeness in their almost three year marriage. That is not gonna cut it for me. It's not long enough as far as I'm concerned considering that every time he leaves, they are "broken up" to me. So if they break up LuNacy, I will say ta-ta to the show. oh well. It guess it couldn't last forever, soapwise or obsession-wise for me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I know it sounds crazy coming from me, but think about how I freaked out that JE was leaivnt the show for five months when TG left this time. Turns out he is only gone for a month or so most likely and she didn't leave with him at all. All that recurring stuff...all speculation.

So in the same moment that the Tracy/Luke break up thing is posted, so is the stuff about Tracy employs luke at ELQ and the stuff about that. So bottom line is...it wont' be both!! Think about the Tracy gives luke a cool recpetion when he came back last time. how long did that last? One scene?

We don't even know if the Tracy won't welcome him back with open arms is true or not. :)

Edit

Good spoiler non-lunacy from soapdish under coming up:

Edited by hookedongh
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Found the following spoilers on SOC. I guess it's part of that SD one because it mentions luke and tracy breaking up in february....

- Look for Tracy and Luke to break up in February

- Luke regrets going away when he returns and is met with a chilly reception.

- Tracy holds Luke at a distance. she claims she won't be like Monica who was lost when Alan died.

- Luke catches up with whats happened with his family.

- Luke is urged to stay out of it because of his health.

I guess he gets over tracy pretty quickly, just jumping into the middle of mob related stuff like it's business as usual.

Edited by TracyLuv
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

yeah, I'm gonna go. I might have to be prodded into it, but I'll go. :) My sister found her first lump at nineteen, and even though it was benign, the doctor did a lumpectomy (maybe because of the size of the lump, I don't know).

I don't have the big breasts problem, so maybe the mammo won't be too bad. Not much to smoosh. :P

About the spoilers: being positive: I actually think the ELQ ones are true. They pretty much line up with the mag ones where JFP said Tracy would do something concerning the Q family that would backfire in her face, and that she would be holding Luke at bay.

I think her hiring him is a condition of her taking him back, but I also think she refuses at first to get close to him again after she sees firsthand how destroyed and devastated MOnica is after losing Emily and Alan.

I think Luke purposely messing things up is part of the "causing havoc for her family", but I also think the mystery client is going to cause huge trouble for ELQ and the Q's. The spec said they're more dangerous than the mob, and that really kinda makes me mad, why does a Q story HAVE to either show them as incompetent or evil, or them bringing about some kind of catastrophe (the condom scandal comes to mind).

I do think it's a good chance because of what JFP already said, that they are true, though.

:)

Could be good, either way, we get more Tracy !

Always a good thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Soap central got those directly from soapdish. The person who dropped the break up was not someone who even ID'd themselves.

Caution again: All the insiders who are legitimate on that site have said over and over again that spoilers are worded to generate the biggest bang for the buck and to be ambiguous.

Chat up who is very reliable said they are keeping them together with pushing/pulling....

I agree with Remos...they need to make Luke change a bit now. I am sure he won't, but I can see luke trying at least initially to worm his way back into her good graces. Now if she stands her ground, he will likely give up, but I don't think Tracy is gonna last long keeping him away. She is way too in love with him.

I think him leaving this way was totally setting them up for this push/pull dynamic for when he got back to keep them fresh and interesting.

Also, the same person who spoiled the ELQ stuff also had said that Kristina would wander off. Now I see tha spoiler on wubs this morning, so maybe it has some truth.

I am glad they are going to let Jane play out being ticked off at him. I don't think it is in Tracy's nature to just take him back this time without at least making him suffer a bit. Their relationship was taken to too high of level for that right now.

Just my opinion.

Question: Do you guys want me to not post any more stuff from soapdish on this site? I will leave that up to you guys. It makes no difference to me either way, I just try to post scoop when I see it. But I don't want to ruin people's day, since we don't know really if much of it is true or not.

Let me know...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

*I hope that's true too. Sounds fun!

*I for one, like reading your SoapDish spoilers...

*I hope Tracy does something to bring back "old Edward". I really don't like this kinda sensitive, hanging out with Alice, slightly bumbling version of Edward. I want nasty fighting with Tracy, givin' em' hell Edward!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I love all the Tracy spoilers and I hope they're true !

:)

I don't have a problem with anyone posting spoilers here from SoapDish or anywhere else. I think it sucks that we sometimes really get our hopes up for things that never happen, but that's a risk you take when you read spoilers.

I actually think there's a good chance the recent ones could be true. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

hey all i love the spoilers. and cant wait for luke to come back to the ice cold tracy. but didnt she give him a chilly reception in january last yr when he came back when she said "who did you see first me or your fake wrife" (something like that) right before alans death. hey i dont want them to break up but breakups arent good unless they are followed by makeups. YUMMY! :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Good news....Chat up (the reliable insider at Soapdish just was on and I asked her if she was ever able to confirm if JE was still on contract or not!

She said:

She is still on contract!

I asked her if she found out if the ELQ stuff was true or about the push/pull luke tracy thing and she said she is travelling and not back in LA til early next week. But she will try to find out.

Okay another insider just posted this. Someone (other than me) asked:

Q: Insider, what is the money Tracy is going to get all about? The new ELQ story?

Will the Enduro condom lawsuits come up again?

A: My last post.

Tracy gets a anonymous donation in an envelope delivered to her. In it is ten million dollars. However she must do something first. I have no idea what it is except it will turn PC upside down if she chooses to accept

Edited by hookedongh
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Woah. Lots of spoilers. What to believe... What to believe...

EDIT: Do you all remember last year around this time (or rather, those who were with the thread last year) when we got all these anonymous spoilers regarding Tracy? It was prob. late December and the spoilers led into January (so the time-line is close enough). Anyhoo! The spoilers - Tracy/Sam/Edward/Dillon and ELQ - were ALL true. Hope they're true this time as well!!!

And ILTQ, I've been thinking about the spoiler that said

Edited by Ms. Quartermaine
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • I'm screaming at those clips and gifs.  THIS IS PURE GOLD.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • That's always been my thought. I can't imagine that the show would play up the unseen AD so far in advance without them casting a *star*. After today's episode, I wonder if he'll somehow be connected with Diane. It was strange that Diane mentioned her very distant family today. I can't recall Diane ever talking about her backstory. Maybe he's her much younger brother?  It's also possible he's connected to Diane during her time in LA. Sally's already said she crossed paths with him. OC, I think Dumas is Mariah's mistake.... As a side note, it was good to see some mixing it up - Adam with Clare/Kyle and Sharon with Tessa.
    • Here's the place to share some memorable criticism. You don't have to agree with it, of course (that's often where the fun starts). Like I mentioned to @DRW50, Sally Field was a favorite punching bag in the late '80s and early '90s.   Punchline (the 1988 movie where she and Tom Hanks are stand ups): "It's impossible to tell the difference between Miss Field's routines that are supposed to be awful, and the awful ones that are supposed to be funny." -- Vincent Canby, New York Times. "It's not merely that Field is miscast; she's miscast in a role that leaves no other resource available to her except her lovability. And (David) Seltzer's script forces her to peddle it shamelessly." -- Hal Hinson, Washington Post. "As a woman who can't tell a joke, Sally Field is certainly convincing. ... Field has become an unendurable performer ... She seems to be begging the audience not to punch her. Which, of course, is the worst kind of bullying from an actor. ... She's certainly nothing like the great housewife-comedian Roseanne Barr, who is a tough, uninhibited performer. Sally Field's pandering kind of 'heart' couldn't be further from the spirit of comedy." -- David Denby, New York   Steel Magnolias: The leading ladies: Dolly Parton: "She is one of the sunniest and most natural of actresses," Roger Ebert wrote. Imagining that she probably saw Truvy as an against-type role, Hinson concluded it's still well within her wheelhouse. "She's just wearing fewer rhinestones." Sally Field: "Field, as always, is a lead ball in the middle of the movie," according to Denby . M'Lynn giving her kidney to Shelby brought out David's bitchy side. "I can think of a lot more Sally Field organs that could be sacrificed." Shirley MacLaine: "(She) attacks her part with the ferociousness of a pit bull," Hinson wrote. "The performance is so manic that you think she must be taking off-camera slugs of Jolt." (I agree. If there was anyone playing to the cheap seats in this movie, it's Shirley.) Olympia Dukakis: "Excruciating, sitting on her southern accent as if each obvious sarcasm was dazzlingly witty," Denby wrote. Daryl Hannah: "Miss Hannah's performance is difficult to judge," according to Canby, which seems to suggest he took a genuine "if you can't say something nice ..." approach. Julia Roberts: "(She acts) with the kind of mega-intensity the camera cannot always absorb," Canby wrote. That comment is so fascinating in light of the nearly 40 years Julia has spent as a Movie Star. She is big. It's the audience who had to play catch up. And on that drag-ish note ... The movie itself: "You feel as if you have been airlifted onto some horrible planet of female impersonators," Hinson wrote. Canby: "Is one supposed to laugh at these women, or with them? It's difficult to tell." Every review I read acknowledged the less than naturalistic dialogue in ways both complimentary (Ebert loved the way the women talked) and cutting (Harling wrote too much exposition, repeating himself like a teenager telling a story, Denby wrote). Harling wrote with sincerity and passion, Canby acknowledged, but it's still a work of "bitchiness and greeting card truisms." The ending was less likely to inspire feeling good as it was feeling relieved, according to Denby. "(It's) as if a group of overbearing, self-absorbed, but impeccable mediocre people at last exit from the house."
    • I tend to have two minds about Tawny (Kathy Najimy) fainting during Soapdish's big reveal. You're the costume designer, if anything, you should have known the whole time. I guess it's an application of what TV Tropes calls the "Rule of Funny." Every time I watch Delirious, I always want the genuine romance in John and Mariel's reunion at the deli counter to last longer. Film critics had their knives out for Sally in this period. I'll start a separate thread on the movies page.
    • I don't think so, but I wouldn't be surprised if he was Dumas this whole time.
    • Tamara Tunie was serving up grand dame diva fierceness.
    • Nick told Victoria that he and Sharon had married in England.  Victoria was shocked.  Then she realized he was kidding.  He confirmed it was a joke and they're platonic. I don't even know what to say about that.
    • It's funny you say that because part of the entertainment of the trials on the show are all the day players who come on as witnesses and jurors.  I'm certain it was like the Law and Order of its time. It employed so many New York actors, that if you look close enough, there's usually someone vaguely recognizable in the courtroom.
    • I will defend Dante.  People already suspect he may be a bit unstable from time to time (from his time as a prisoner).  And, he's taking care of other people's kids from time to time.  So, he has reason to be cautious with those in his care.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy