Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Members
Posted

That's what pisses me off about the religious exemption.
A religious exemption is intended to protect followers of a religion against laws and mandates that go against a tenet of their religion.
So this applies to, say, not paying for an abortion when your religion preaches that it is murder.
Fine.
HOWEVER it doesn't apply to "I'll claim that whatever I don't want to do is due to my religion".

Someone can correct me if I am wrong but I am pretty sure the only major US religion for which rejection of vacccines (and traditional medicine) is an actualy tenet that is taught, preached and believed is Christian scientism.

In NO other religion has there ever been a dogmatic issue with vaccines one way or another - which is why, vocal and meddling as Churches have been in our politics, it was never an issue until now. If it was a dogmatic issue, you can well imagine they'd have said something.
So: no. There is no religious exemption to be had because one's rejection of the covid vaccine is not in any way, shape or form based on a religious belief or a religious teaching. Claiming "Religion!" is not a get-out-of-jail free card for any law you don't like.
Some people who have decided they didn't want this vaccine for whatever reasons are after the fact trying to find rationales for their decision but that's not a religion.
Unless you count the current GOP as a cult which, you know...

 

This. So much this.
Just like Trump is simply in-your-face and crude about things most Republicans have believed and done under a facade of false rationales and propriety for decades. It is not a difference of degree, it is a difference of style. And it is morally bankrupt both ways

  • Replies 555
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members
Posted

How does that crow taste? - eat crow jer | Meme Generator

@j swift

Some of us just waited to hear the facts and trusted certain sources that don't normally talk gossip. 

Now we can all get a nice break until Mrs. Burton tells Steve she's had her fill of "Stone Cold" and it's time to stop running podcasts out of their basement.

 

Bye Buh Bye GIF - Bye Buh Bye Harley Quinn - Discover & Share GIFs

 

  • Members
Posted (edited)

Admittedly not delicious.  As previously noted I am not a fan of the actor nor the character, and I am firm believer in science and social responsibilty.  However, I'd be lying if I didn't say that I had the perfect "told you so" gif cued up for the moment Jason crawled out of that cave.

Alas, some people would rather throw away a thirty year career over a rigid adherence to personal beliefs rather than participate in a collective effort of healing.  Just as this, selfish, uneducated, melodramatic, poorly aging, fool now expects people to support him financially through patreon when he wouldn't wear a mask or get a shot to protect the health of even one of his fans.

Edited by j swift
  • Members
Posted

Not just Patreon but also Cameo… at least he probably will stay away from Onlyfans. At least he admitted his departure so we don’t have to wait anymore to hear either way.

  • Members
Posted

The sad thing is, I bet many of his fans will do support him financially in any way he puts out there. I still can’t believe he was kissing multiple costars, while Delta was raging and he wasn’t vaccinated. 

I think his accommodation requests were BS, but the legal standard for a religious exemption is that it has to be a sincerely held religious belief. The religion itself is less important than the persons prior conduct in similar situations (i.e., even if the Pope said Catholics can get the vaccine, a court may find that a Catholic has a sincerely held religious belief that must be accommodated). We don’t know if in Steve’s case GH found he didn’t have such a belief or if accommodating him would be an undue burden (especially since he has to routinely swap spit with his coworkers!). I’m a lawyer and helping my HR dept wade through our RA requests and some are…interesting. 

  • Members
Posted

I can't believe that SB would expect any financial aid from 'fans' through Patreon.

The guy has had steady well paid employment for years as well as 'side hustles'.

If he is not financially secure by this point then that's on him.

Anyway the whole Patreon thing bugs me full stop.

  • Members
Posted

Well if He had made GH believe he was vaccinated and then couldnt back it up. Then with him getting COVID and realizing he was unvaccinated & kissing co-stars, which put them at risk

The Nava scenes seemed empty without the kissing but until MC was vaxxed I appauld Maura for saying no kissing

  • Members
Posted

Pure foolishness from some folks who should know better. Yeah, yeah, you work with the dude for years, I don't care, this is life or death:

 

  • Members
Posted

What's with this freedom s hit? I'm so sick of hearing this garbage!!

Chad Brannon (ex-Zander): So sorry Steve. Way to stand for personal freedom. And great word of gratitude.

Please register in order to view this content

Great perspective.

  • Members
Posted (edited)

Wow that Chad Brannon quote is very disappointing. Was expecting (and understand) all the heart emojis but let’s not act like this fool is some modern day Rosa Parks

Edited by Nixor
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I keep forgetting a huge chunk of that year was written by scabs. You're probably right, because by the time the strike was over, they were likely planning an exit for Alan's character as it must have been obvious by then that Bernau was not going to return. If he was still there, it's also doubtful they would have approached MZ and MG about coming back. Wild.
    • And to think the original plan was for David and Lesley to have an affair.  Not only would that have made no sense - Lesley wasn't THAT stupid, lol - but it also would've ruined her and GH.
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Week ending March 5 1978 Second season shows are tested CBS finishes first week in March with stronger than usual 1 9.5, but not enough to beat ABC The prime -time ratings pattern continued to hold steady for the week ended March 5, and attention increasingly turns to second season entries as the networks probe one another's weaknesses or cover their own. As usual, ABC -TV won the week, scoring a 20.5 average rating. But CBS -TV was closer than usual with a 19.5 average garnered with the help of several strong specials and movies in addition to some of its dependable series regulars. NBC followed its habit of plummeting when its "évent "entries failed. In this case it was the miniseries, Loose Change, which scored only 24 and 22 shares on Monday and Tuesday, leaving the network with a 16.9 average rating for the week. Looking at new series and new time slots, ABC's Six Million Dollar Man on Monday (8 -9 p.m. NYT) continued to falter with a 22 share, while What's Happening, in its new slot on Saturday (8 -9 p.m.), also remained shaky with a 23 share. Starsky and Hutch is still healthy with a 38 share in its new slot following Charlie's Angels on Wednesday, and How the West Was Won also had a 38 on Sunday (8 -9 p.m.). Against West CBS's Rhoda and On Our Own came in poorly for the second week in a row of face to face competition, with each pulling 25 shares after a 41 share lead in from 60 Minutes. ABC's special two -hour presentation of the upcoming series tryout, Having Babies, scored a 27 share on Friday (9 -11 p.m.) against strong competition from both the other networks (the movie "Ski Lift to Death" on CBS and Rockford Files and Quincy on NBC). For CBS, its new Monday night leadoffs, Good Times and Baby I'm Back, scored so -so 27 and 28 shares respectively. But the second half of the night had its best performance since the new line -up came in- M *A*S *Hwith a 45, One Day at a Time with a 41 and Lou Grant with a 36. Celebrity Challenge of the Sexes and Shields and Yarnell showed no signs of reviving on Tuesday, with 16 shares each, but the new Tuesday movie slot held up with a 41 share from Clint Eastwood's "Magnum Force." The network's entire Saturday line up continued to limp in, as Bob Newhart Tony Randall, The Jeffersons, Maude and Kojak all scored sub 30 shares (with the exception of Newhart's 29, in fact, all scored sub -25 shares). NBC premiered its new Chuck Barris Rah Rah Show on Tuesday (8 -9 p.m.),when it pulled a 24 share. The second episode of Quark had a 27, three points down from its premiere. There might be the temptation to conclude that the 29 share turned in by the National Love, Sex and Marriage Test on Sunday (9:30 -10 p.m.) proves the appetite for "sophisticated" subject matter is not insatiable after all, except that its competition was not only CBS's strong comedy block but also ABC's rerun of "The Way We Were," which pulled a 35 share. Of NBC's other midseason entries -CPO Sharkey, Black Sheep Squadron, James at 16 and Class of '65 -CPO Sharkey turned in the highest score of the week, a 27.   *NBC were in dire straits at this point relying on movies and specials which could hit or bomb in equal measure.  Fred Silverman had his work cut out for him when he arrived that Summer. He favored sitcoms and series as the schedule's foundation and NBC had no sitcoms to build on and few solid series. He also had a big backlog of specials/mini series that had been committed to air. Also NBC had a long standing relationship with Universal so he was forced to work with that studio. He struggled to get quality producers on board as they were either tied into deals with ABC/CBS or were wary of having their shows on the 3rd rated network. He still felt variety had a place on the schedule however and that lead to duds like Susan Anton, The Big Show and Pink Lady and Jeff.
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • I spent years hoping we would get an oral history like the OLTL book, but it’s too late now with so many having passed away.
    • It’s also strange that it was Monica! I just don’t think of her as the staring off into space type of woman! I watched a bunch of other clips and stuff from random 1978 and 1979 episodes. I’m so used to seeing movement from Monty’s era, especially the early part, that this really is a cool relic. Pretty soon you have scenes start at the new nurses station, the elevators opening and doctors walking to the desk to get their messages from Jessie or Bobbie. People often walk towards doors while taking coats on or off, many Webber house scenes start or end with someone walking up the stairs. This episode is even more static than some of the way earlier ones I have seen, where you would have Steve or Jessie at least going from the old school nurses desk to the medicine room, Steve’s office, etc. That bland dialogue is very much like what they have now. The show picks up a lot of personality. Knowing what we know about David Hamilton and how that really started to get the ball rolling as far as viewers you really see just how vital Lesley and especially Laura were to get things moving for them. They focused on the right characters to get fast results. The show now could learn a thing or two from this.
    • It won't allow me to watch it via the link; I am only able to watch it with the app.
    • Just finished the Goldfinch. Read it in 4-5 days... and it's a huuuuge book. Well... I would rate the first 500 pages a solid 10 out of 10... but then the next 300 were kind of a letdown... so the overall impression is something like - 7/10. It's just very hard to give something a full 10 after reading A little life.  Still... loved it immensely and would probably re-read it in the future. There is a movie adaptation... starring Nicole Kidman... that I haven't seen. 
    • I realize I harp on this, but I think he spending is relevant.  She's not just buying new wigs. She's building a mansion, she's funding a sports complex, she's paying for operations for people she doesn't know, she's caring for Peaches, she's buying apartments. We saw ?her get ONE check for ONE million dollars. That's it. I may be wrong, but I thought they said she'd get a payment every 6 months. Regardless, she could not rule the roost on $1M, and the show is not doing a good job there. Pretending that doesn't matter? I can't do that.  All they had to do was add a couple lines about payouts and payments.  In other news, I would love to know just how much Anita was putting into that trust as well as what investment got her what has to be an incredible return.

      Please register in order to view this content

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy