Jump to content

General Hospital: August 2021 Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Members

I think the lesson here is that everyone wants to boink NC and since they can't, they want to see whichever character on-screen they identify the most with boink NC.

So suddenly everyone spots gay chemsitry with another twunk and thinks he should go for cougars. What a coincidence that this conveniently overlaps with the largest demographics watching the show ;-)
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 501
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Well the boys did have a bit of unintentional chemistry. On todays episode. It's the same unintentional chemistry. Michael and Chase have. I'm certainly not stupid enough. To think that GH would ever go there. This isn't a show on cable or a steaming service. It's just a dopey ultra conservative played out soap. On it's last legs. Still around because ABC. Has nothing better to replace it with. Which we'll never achieved the great highest it did in the 70's,80's.90's. It's a miracle that it's somewhat watchable. After the decimation it has suffered through for the last 20 yrs.

Edited by victoria foxton
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Hey, feel free to enjoy the chemistry you feel if you feel it. Far from me to yuck your yum. 

But let's be blunt: the reason Michael and Chase or Spencer and Cam are not going to be paired is not because GH is too conservative.
It is because they are straight characters. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're usually very nice. You are giving off a very condescending tone.  I'm well aware that the characters are straight. But even straights can give off those vibes. GH treats their gays like crap. Anyway i don't want to battle anyone. That's just my dopey opinion's. I'm the pathetic loser on a message board. At 1:44 in the morning discussing sheer nonsense.

Edited by victoria foxton
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I may not love the relentlessly horny fixations that sometimes overtake threads or the sixth grade mentality it engenders, but it's time to pause. Ever since you have shown up here you have felt the need to explain things to people like they're five. So yes, let's be blunt: You've been here about six minutes and you think you came to educate the forum, but in practice you often have a very poor grasp of the facts you discuss. You state obvious things we all knew years ago and then act like you just dropped knowledge. And whenever you've been actually proven wrong on facts about these shows, particularly BTS information, you retreat from the topic entirely as though it were a debate society and people should be invested in convincing you. These are not debates. Nobody needs to convince you, and nobody needs your help understanding anything. We are all aware these characters, even Spencer who has pinged since childhood, are being portrayed as heterosexual. This lack of shading or diversity in these shows' ensembles, is precisely because the shows are conservative. If you are unable to process two distinct sets of non-exclusive facts, that is your failure of imagination.

You are not the rational, sensible poster you believe you are. You don't think before you speak and you often don't know much about topics this board has hashed out in discussion for over a decade. Read more and talk less.

Edited by Vee
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well I certainly very much apologize. I certainly didn't intend to be condescending, nor did I do it knowingly.
I wanted to make the last point because I thought it was important to remind *ourselves* of the narrative framework the show works under that doesn't have to be from a place of conservatism - there is plenty to say on how poorly GH writes its openly gay characters but that's a different conversation.
But there is nothing wrong nor dopey about your opinion. I feel very bad I gave you the impression I thought otherwise and again I apologize.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You're being plural when you should be singular and speak for you. This isn't kindergarten. When "we" need to remind "ourselves", we'll do it ourselves. No one needs your help to explain to us why GH, a show that has zero Black frontburner characters and no LGBT contract players, is not really conservative. All of network daytime is conservative, because it believes as it has for several decades that its audience is predominantly white conservatives who need to be coddled and catered to. That's why this show is what it is in 2021. So no, these conversations are really not that different.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Oh there is no denying American soaps are conservative.  This is a genre that used to have frank discussions about sex, abortions, illness, rape, mental illness, etc long before other shows on television.  International soaps have had thriving, vibrant stories about LGBTQ and more overall representation for the same 20 years that American soaps have given the these topics lip service at best.

Even DAYS, once groundbreaking (for the US in daytime)with its use of gay characters didn’t know what to do with them and wrote them out several times.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Of course American soaps are conservative.
I mean, I take responsibility for the fact the point I was trying to make completely and utterly crashed and burned - and hurt a fellow poster in the process - and I am not going to belabor this particular conversation but my argument really really wasn't that soaps aren't conservative.
Of course they are.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • That was the original point of me sending you her 6 airdates, so now with those, and the link to the daily episode guide I've provided, that should help you more easily find the additional Ruth Buzzi scenes. I will always repeat myself when it comes to defending my data that I've taken decades to research and compile. But, as you pointed out in a recent post, I am kind, so at least I will do it with you in a kind way as opposed to the usual social media way most people do with just getting rude/nasty. That's not my style, as you correctly pointed out earlier this week, and never will be.  So, all is well! 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Ambyr Michelle continues to be *that girl.* She’s just a star, period. Elevates every scene she’s in on the sheer strength of her emotional realism and charisma. Can sell any dialogue. I wish the show veered away from the B&B-style scripting. TMG/Leslie’s tirade stood out, I suppose, but she’s getting a bit mustache-twirly. And I wish DD had more to do in that episode than stand and sob.
    • Well, that was down to CBS being weak and not being willing to just pulling the plug entirely. They didn't want to commit to cancelling the show in case they needed it for their schedule basically; plus they kept showing that they were willing to make cuts if needed to be. 
    • I'm sorry but clearly what I've said is not satisfactory to you. I have now read what you have to say, twice. As it happens, my interest at this point is looking at other mislabeled files to find this other Ruth Buzzi content. I do not see any point to each of us repeating ourselves, so I will leave it here. 
    • It seemed to be your intent. coming into a thread I started and making multiple posts saying my data was wrong. In the next paragraph you say "Of course, I was suspicious from the very first instance where what I saw & heard did not agree with what it should have.  I'm very glad to know why." That certainly didn't stop you from immediately saying the data was wrong, until I provided additional receipts. Why did you not check the daily episode guide (for instance, this one for the 1980's) I posted for the world to see for exactly this reason...to help confirm airdates: http://daytimeroyaltyonline.com/days-daily-summaries-1980-1989-t15361.html? That is what you should be checking BEFORE you make any posts in the future like this, trying to suggest something from my data is incorrect. You could have also messaged me and asked me why your dates weren't adding up with what the correct data is. I would have fast forwarded through that video you posted, spotted Roman and Hope and immediately have told you that was the 11/1/83 episode.
    • Jason, just let me say that it was not my intent to any way impugn any of your data  or research. I'm very sorry if it came out that way. Obviously the person I got these 4 November episodes from has mislabeled files, multiples, which I was certainly unaware of.  When I am editing it is all about what I see & hear. Later, I find time for greater reflection.  Of course, I was suspicious from the very first instance where what I saw & heard did not agree with what it should have.  I'm very glad to know why.  If you find you are no longer interested in the edit, that is fine. I have no ego in this. I did it only to share it.
    • I feel like Vernon and Anita need to not be hypocrites and try and take the heat off Bill in this case. It's clear that the family used him as a fixer and especially knowing he helped with Martin's situation, they need to either be quiet or support him. BTW...with Vanessa being in the hospital for food poisoning, am I the only one who thought Shanice was gonna say she's pregnant or had an STD? The only reason I say STD is because she hasn't had any memorable sex partners, but I definitely don't believe she just had food poisoning.
    • Yeah, I mean I know that the name still pertains. I just laugh at it not now being called Arizona Dust, but, I admit it simply does not have the same ring to it. Above, that is interesting that Arizona had already come up before the crisis. 
    • Anita vs. Leslie, bring it!
    • Leslie and her family are from Chicago? Anita's background also includes being a former Chi-Town native? Might they connect this and go somewhere with it?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy