Jump to content

GH: AMC FAVE Joins Cast


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Said all of us since 2013....

 

Again, Chase doesn't need a mother, and the show doesn't need Finn and approximately 17 other useless characters while core characters get ignored

Yes, Scott needed a child in town <cough> Serena<cough>.  No it didn't need to be Frankenstein's monster.

Julian does not need to be the father of any of the children in Port Charles (save Lucas, because that's just known from the 80s)

Etc..  Etc..  Etc...

And ruining poor Delia from Ryan's Hope having her abandon a child (and act like Roxy Balsom) still has me fuming.

 

#firefrank and put the show back on track.  I'm not saying I want to see people unemployed.  I am saying the wrong ones aren't on contract (Tristan Rogers) while others can go off contract (Michael Easton) and just pop in.

 

For the billionth time, James DePaiva would have made a much better Jeff than he was as Dr. Fu*k-me-or-flunk. Kim Delaney would be a breath of fresh air as Liz's mom, shaking out the curtains at Audrey's house...and taking Elizabeth to task for poor decision making, while praising off-screen Sarah and letting Liz know that for all her faults, she's 10x the mother she's been.

 

Edited by slick jones
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 103
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

 

That's how I feel. As much as I wanted Serena on the canvas.

 

We're lucky Hayley Erin or Kristen Alderson weren't Serena. She would have been Michael's five minute love interest. NO THANKS.

 

She'd have been either killed under Phelps or written badly under Frank.

 

It does irritate me we can't have Lucy's kid on the canvas but we have to spend years over Nina's daughter and we have Wallow that they've tried to make happen. We need 'fresh blood' but it irritates me when soaps try so hard to make unconnected characters work and then toss out connections for them in a last ditch effort when that person should have just been an off-spring of a legacy character instead.

Edited by KMan101
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • It should be in its synopsis on the DVR description of the show.
    • Well, in a way DAYS "Renee Dumonde DiMera Threw a Party & Invited Everyone & Then Told the Whole Town Off" if you see what I mean. She definitely pretended that she was throwing this shindig for a pleasant reason while she KNEW her real intent wasn't pleasant AT ALL. And, everyone in Salem was targeted by her in this way.  I mean it was supposedly a celebration of her engagement. But, that is not what happened! I think it checks off all your boxes. And, before today I would definitely have called it "singular". There was nothing like it. Now, there's something not only similar but possibly .... more far-reaching?  
    • What's with this show constantly encouraging women to take back men who aren't worth a damn, then end up doing it lol. This was realistically a 4-episode week considering all the flashbacks to the showstopper can collectively form a 19-minute episode on its own.  
    • Another episode uploaded. Love Chandler introduction.

      Please register in order to view this content

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Naomi was in Monday's episode, though the client wasn't. Naomi and Jacob were at Uptown with Chelsea, Allison, Derek, and Ashley. And what an amazing episode that was today. Tricia Mann-Grant was absolute perfection as was Ambyr Michelle. I cannot wait to see Dana mix it up with the Duprees, especially Anita. 
    • This is me *pea green with envy* *sigh* The Reva vortex was like an F5 tornado. Widespread mayhem and damage.
    •  Yeah, I guess what easily comes to mind are guests who have taken advantage of a situation to reveal a secret (e.g. the mistress stopping a wedding to say that they're pregnant), or a host who planned an event to reveal things (like John Dixon's plan to humiliate Lisa at their engagement party on ATWT). But, that's a whole other level, where you can manipulate someone to throw a party in order to ruin it.
    • Not the community penis. Providing his service pro bono...I can't with his thirsty a**. Any chance that the OG Ted can come back as his brother back from the dead who died in the plane crash. It would give Andre family, too. 
    • Now that Leslie has had her fun what is she hoping for now? If I were Ted I'd be on the prowl for a hitman. Take her OUT! The new Ted, known for playing vile characters, just might do that.
    • To be clear, I know there have been a gazillion reveals at events on soaps. But these are usually events that would happen anyhow, like a city commemoration or a long-planned wedding. My *specific* question:  Has a character ever orchestrated an event to occur, for a seemingly benevolent reason, but actually for the sole purpose of spilling a reveal at the party, to the surprise of the event planners/hosts. Specifically: an event that the event hosts wouldn't have thought of making happen, and the hosts planned this event -- only due to the seemingly-innocent urging of the outside instigator who is secretly planning the reveal. This is NOT about an event that would have happened anyways. My reason for asking:  April/May 2025, on BeyondTheGates, a couple was NOT planning a wedding anniversary party.  But there was a plot by an instigator to convince the couple to have the party, and the motivation for this was so that the instigator could do a big reveal. The party wouldn't have happened if the instigator hadn't suggested it. I'm wondering if this has ever happened before on a soap, that a big event came into existence due to the plotting of the revealers.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy