Jump to content

GH April 2018 Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 33
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I really that Roger Howarth had been able to stay Todd, he was just better without bending hell and heaven to make him viable. Speaking of OLTL, I'm still annoyed by the dropped Alcazar/Tomas story.

 

Sn: Why is Lila Rae not on the canvas as a rival for Molly? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

I will never care about him or their efforts to force him onto the canvas and make him viable. He's not. The more a show force feeds me someone, the more I resist. He's got a brain tumor!!!! He was molested!!!! (was he? I'm not keeping up). FEEL SORRY FOR HIM!!!! LIZ DOES! SO YOU SHOULD TOO! HE'S SCOTT'S SON NOW!!! YOU CARE ABOUT HIM SO YOU SHOULD CARE ABOUT FRANCO!! CARE ABOUT FRANCO NOW!!!

 

UGH

 

So many casuals just lap that [!@#$%^&*] right up.

 

I feel like I've made the right choice to stop watching GH. I haven't watched since the Faison story wrapped up. I'm not even following what happens that closely.

 

Are they still trying to force asexual, chemistry-free Kim and Julian? Julian ... another one they've worked overtime to force onto the canvas. I'm so disgusted the show listens to the rabid Julexis fanbase. Frank's interview is so hypocritical.

 

+1

 

I'd be fine if he were playing Todd. Franco is just Todd-lite (Howarth plays him that way) and someone they've worked beyond overtime to force onto the canvas.

 

When something doesn't work, you admit it, let him go, and move on. But not Frank. It's like he tells them to try even harder to make viewers care for him and feel sorry for him and accept him. It's so blatant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think that's the whole problem with the show in a nutshell.  The writers aren't terrible but they're being forced to feature the characters viewers would rather not see and either placing the characters viewers do care to see on an infrequent recurring basis or firing beloved actors altogether.  This does not bode well for the show's future.

This is what happens when no one in charge listens to viewers who care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Yep. I actually don't think the writers are awful. Not saying they're spectacular, but I think if they could do their own thing it wouldn't be the worst show. I liked some of the ideas they had a few months ago. Something went off the rails around the Faison story wrapping up (and Genie suddenly exiting in the middle of the mayor story). I was kind of liking the show up until then.

 

Interesting how Frank tries to say some things aren't his decision. So who's are they? Who dumped Genie and Kin? I truly believe he believes what he says, but he's so full of it ... no, Frank, if you TRULY cared about GH you wouldn't fill it with your friends from other shows and get rid of veterans that matter to the fans of the show. That interview, the lunch with Genie and how she spoke out all reeks of damage control for Frank.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Watching the cult of Fetterman collapse is one of the few political bright spots for me. The best part  is watching all the people who built him up now decide they want to tear him down. I'll be fascinated to see how this ends for him. https://buckscountybeacon.com/2025/05/pennsylvanias-democratic-senator-john-fetterman-raises-alarms-with-outburst-at-meeting-with-union-officials/

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Long ago, this Rachel fan channel uploaded a number of clips of Rachel with Felicia during the alcoholism story, and this one in particular stands out for me. 

      Please register in order to view this content

      And then you have this scene, which is the dark mirror of the above, especially the final moment: By the late '80s, especially after Wallingford's death, those times were gone, and Donna Swajeski added further misery to Felicia with the Gold Street backstory. Luckily, after a bit of time the show found a good framing for this new twist on Felicia. The stories with finding and losing a love from her past, learning that a woman she hated was the daughter she'd spent years searching for, sinking into alcoholism, they all fit into the type of material suited for the '40s and '50s screen goddesses.  When Dano tried some of this old weepy type of material when she went back to ABC, it mostly fell flat, as the atmosphere wasn't the same and her character always felt shoehorned in. It worked perfectly at this period on AW because you had Iris, you had Rachel, you had Donna - you had a number of tough-but-vulnerable women of a certain age, most of them grandmothers by this point, but still trying to find love, find themselves. This is what AW could have had earlier if they hadn't dumped Pat and Alice, but better late than never. This is an approach you saw more often on British soaps than on US soaps, which for a number of years respected women in that age group. Both UK and US soaps have done away with this, both countries having the ladies devolve into perpetual ingenues (with added doses of endlessly self-aware camp in the UK) or just being shipped off entirely.  You could even see that on AW with the treatment of Iris (shipped off, never to be mentioned again, too old to return), Donna (repeatedly humiliated and crippled), Felicia (regressed into degrading herself with married John), Rachel (mother to newborn twins, put into lengthy periods of trauma through her new relationship with Carl). 
    • I'm of a certain age where I caught some of Upton's final year and it was not great but Jean Holloway was worse. All I remember is Bambi, Bambi, Bambi!
    • Yes, of course, all of those servants added to the overall picture at AW & also people had relationships with those servants! I like it when Anita asks after one of the servants at the club, how their children are doing & like that. 
    • Great scenes between Marlena and EJ today. Paula and Jeanne are making EJ have more depth than Ron had during his long drawn out tenure.
    • Might as well say it, Minority opinion, granted, but I like Joss & I'm okay with this WSB story & i hope that Emma will be their next recruit & she & Joss can be partners.
    • Thanks again @Paul Raven  The Arlene/Ben/Betsy triangle is one I wish I could see for myself as on paper it doesn't tend to excite me but I can see how well-constructed it was. I wish I could see the Rick/Meg relationship too, although I wish they'd had him genuinely fall for Meg after he gets together with Cal. The whole Brooke/Deacon/Bridget story on B&B was horribly damaging to Brooke as a character but it was dramatically very sound because I could completely believe Deacon would fall for messy and vulnerable Brooke after finally settling down with the more docile Bridget.
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • According to the head writer list, it seems the show may have started to fall apart while either the Schneiders or Upton were writing.  And when it started to crumble, it crumbled fast.  It was sad to see everything Labine had brought to LOL be disassembled.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy