My biggest problem with Chelsea is that she serves no purpose. I hate the way they write her as some sort of saint when we know the secret she's keeping with Victor, not to mention the teased past with Jordan. She also lacks chemistry with most of the cast. I just worry everything is going so well and they're going to derail everything with an Adam return to eat up the show. He is *so* unneeded.

10 hours ago, DramatistDreamer said:

 

My point is that you should know what you're talking about before you cite it as a fact.  But anyway, continue on with you temper tantrum over a damn soap opera. That sounds very adult and stable.

 

 

via GIPHY

Firstly,  I was saying that if during the golden period for this show there was a platform as accessible like we have today, meaning message boards we all can get onto at the blink of an eye, people will be nit picking the show.

 

Further, deciding to counter my statement of the internet not being around in 1987 vs my statement regarding idiot nit-picky fans always being around completely, without any doubt, proved my point.

 

For the record, I know good and well the internet, then called the intranet, not the 'world wide web' as it wasn't world wide---as you said in your post, which created a contradiction---was around.  Further, intranet was basically the same thing as closed-circuit TV--it was within a campuses/compounds. 

34 minutes ago, Chris B said:

Chelsea has to go. I'm not sure why they're holding onto her. She is dragging Nick down in their scenes so bad.

 

I feel the exact opposite lol. Chelsea finding out Chloe "killed" Adam has actually been really great material when they weren't using it to shoehorn this horrible pairing with Nick and having him play Matlock Jr or pretend to have ever cared about his brother just so he could be the hero. I'd like to see them end this fail couple, throw him in the middle of Scott and Sharon and have Chelsea shake it up with the Brash and Sassy crew. She has good untapped chemistry with Jordan, JT's Billy, and Cane and those pairings would come with less contrived baggage.

2 hours ago, Chris B said:

 He is *so* unneeded.

 

I read somewhere this guy had an accident, was in a coma, when he came out of it. He turn out gay. Maybe Adam come back really into guys this time, then they can really get rid of Chelsea. 

 

 

And 90% of people derided me when I said MCE's Chelsea should have just rode off into the sunset with JH's Adam. I feel complete vindication now.  Not to mention Chloe's story was an epic fail from the start. 

6 minutes ago, soapfan770 said:

And 90% of people derided me when I said MCE's Chelsea should have just rode off into the sunset with JH's Adam. I feel complete vindication now.  Not to mention Chloe's story was an epic fail from the start. 

 

I never understand why they hire her. Instead of killing off Colleen, sending Heather away, down playing Chloe. Everything they wrote for Chelsea could have been for one of them girls.

When Chelsea plays grifter smart determined Chelsea, it works. Her scenes these past few episodes were quite good.  And then switch to remorse/guilt over Chloe worked as well. MCE hasn't been given anything worthy since the scenes when she found out Gabe was Adam. I hope these scenes coupled with Jordan reminding her of her previous life bring out more. Timid, mourning Chelsea is boring and no actor can enjoy that for an extended period. 

1 hour ago, soapfan770 said:

And 90% of people derided me when I said MCE's Chelsea should have just rode off into the sunset with JH's Adam. I feel complete vindication now.  Not to mention Chloe's story was an epic fail from the start. 

 

I always agreed with this. Chelsea is pointless without Adam. But I get why they held onto her....for the obvious recast. 

I actually am even starting to enjoy Amelia Heinle's Victoria.  She's not Heather Tom but she's been doing much better with this writing regime.

8 minutes ago, juniorz1 said:

I actually am even starting to enjoy Amelia Heinle's Victoria.  She's not Heather Tom but she's been doing much better with this writing regime.

 

She's doing better because Victoria is being written more how she should be. I personally can't say I enjoy her or will ever enjoy her or accept her in the role, even after all these years. JMO. But I'm glad you find her more enjoyable.

36 minutes ago, KMan101 said:

She's doing better because Victoria is being written more how she should be. I personally can't say I enjoy her or will ever enjoy her or accept her in the role, even after all these years. JMO. But I'm glad you find her more enjoyable.

 

+1

 

As for Chelsea -- not even the pairing with Adam justifies her. She's never worked, and never will.

25 minutes ago, YRBB said:

 

+1

 

As for Chelsea -- not even the pairing with Adam justifies her. She's never worked, and never will.

 

Nope. She hasn't worked. To me there was initial potential, and the Chloe thing has bombed in terms of her, imo, and she shouldn't exist just to prop Adam.

Have y'all seen that Sony survey on JT that's all the talk?

4 minutes ago, ajsp35801 said:

Have y'all seen that Sony survey on JT that's all the talk?

Wonder what this means 

49 minutes ago, cassadine1991 said:

Wonder what this means 

 

No idea. But they were very detailed questions. Compared him to BM and BuJ.