Jump to content

Y&R Debuts New Opening Credits


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 110
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

LOVE most of it! The diamonds falling in the background of Nikki's shot, the champagne glasses clinking in the background of Ashley's shot (ironic since the bish can't get a love interest), it's giving me LIFE. I like the paint stroke effects and the background shots related to the character posing. My only criticism is the very generic font used throughout and the fact the "The Young and the Restless" text is so high up for the title card instead of being centred on the screen, And the reuse of the headless woman, if that was a motif they wanted to keep they could have easily reshot with one of their countless female starlets rather than use a shot of Michelle Stafford from over a decade ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't understand why Mal has turned up the harsh white light. This show is about glamour and wrinkle/bag free.  The close ups of all the actors (except Eileen) are terrible.  They all look like they drank and smoked pot all night before the shoot.  Give us some filters.  I've complained about the lighting for a few months.  It's antithetical to the fictional Bell/Genoa City world.  Everything was glitzy, sparkly, soft, moody, wood paneled, Wisconsin and grand mansion style.  I hate the Santa Barbara/Sunset Beach look and feel the show has taken.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The transitions between the actors is not well done. They're too quick, there's no fluidity. 

 

The lighting (and I noticed this when these shots were just used during the interstitials) sucks. Makes everyone over 40 (and Melissa Ordway) look run down.

 

And Mishael Morgan's section is obviously a video that's been reversed. Bad, bad work.

 

Other than that I liked the very beginning and it's not the old opening which is something.

 

Please register in order to view this content

 

As much as people hate this opening there's no question that real conscious effort was put into it. It came out in 1999 but looks like something from 1990 but at least they tried.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

@RavenWhitney Speaking of lighting, to me, it seems like the exterior shots look better than the interior shots now, on the show, I mean.

 

Remember when the exteriors used to look like really bad CGI?  The scenes with Sharon in her car or Devon being transported to the emergency room have better lighting than most interior scenes now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Darn, you always take the words out of my mouth!

 

The new opening is so bland. The editing is really bad. Don't get me started on the lighting. It looks like it belongs to a Crystal Chappell web soap!

 

I floved the late 90s 'p0rn red' opening credits. 

 

Does this mean Melissa Ordway is here to stay?...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I like it more than their last opening. The only thing that gets me is, as others have said, it feels very web-soap. It also feels like something fan-edited. And given that MTS has actually aged pretty well, they make her look ancient, like a First Lady from 1953. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I still like the sax/red/p*rn opening. How hilarious to see CG there as a child - I forgot she 'made' it on the opening credits.

I like the new credits in that they've added more actors to the opening - nine, compared to previous version, which usually had six. Plus, all the actors look good - a welcome change. Now, let's work on those stories.... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Today's show was completely meh to me. -- I'm frustrated with the Articulettes story. I know it's early, but we've had countless conversations between Anita and Tracy, and we've learned nothing specific about what happened.       Yes, Sharon is "the angry one," but why would Anita agree to go on tour and talk to Sharon without even discussing those past problems with Anita? It makes no sense. -- We're supposed to feel bad for Chelsea and her unrequited love, but I still think it's a problem that no one's mentioning that she wanted to break up a marriage.      She spoke today about the "3-way relationship," but we never saw her invested in the guy in any way, shape, or form. She wanted the woman. She needs to get with someone who isn't damn married or in a relationship.  -- Another Hayley pregnancy? Already? I'm not crazy about the timing on this. Honestly, I wanted fireworks with the Hayley character and not watching her walk around with a big belly and then a stroller. -- Tomas is still painfully awkward, although I do like looking at him and I love his voice. I also think it's strange that he and Kat are having conversations that every other couple would have on their first or second meeting.      Haven't these two been seeing each other for a couple months? It's as if they know nothing about each other. -- I still dislike almost every fade to commercial, and it takes away from the scene we just saw. It's like putting a comma at the end of a sentence instead of a period -- these fades do not make a statement. It's clearly intentional, but I will never get on board with whatever it is they're doing.
    • Because, of course. Criminals gonna criminal together.
    • It's interesting that LIAMST got cancelled over LOL or SS , both of which rated lower. I guess other factors came into play.
    • Thank you! So this throws into doubt one of the Y&R's pre-emptions. Rest of my post isn't needed now we have the info   Ah and the puzzle solved, lol. Too quick
    • Based on the preemptions above, I think I have figured out the one wrong item, and learned a new piece of history in doing the 1973 sleuthing! All of the preemptions matched except for 4 shows (Love of Life, Search for Tomorrow, Young and the Restless and Gambit) which each had one MORE preemption than expected. Checking on Watergate from 10/3/73 (since all 4 of those shows have that date list as the common one between them), there was a bomb threat called into the Watergate committee, which made the morning session get called off shortly after 11AM, and then after a bomb search, they started the afternoon session an hour earlier at 1PM. So, based on that, I am removing 10/3/73 as a preemption date for those 4 shows. CBS looks like they wrapped up commentary quickly after 11AM and aired the 4 shows (Love of Life would be a partial episode). (Although Vanderbilt does say they had commentary during that time, that does not look to be the case).   # of Preemptions 10/1/73-10/26/73: All My Children...0                        Another World...3            MON 10/8/73 NBC 2-(448) NCLS Game                                      TUE 10/9/73 NBC 2-(507) & (507)-onward NLCS Game & ALCS Game                                      WED 10/10/73 NBC 2-(440) & (440)-onward NCLS Game & ALCS Game As the World Turns...1    WED 10/3/73 CBS 10AM-5PM: Watergate  Days of Our Lives...3      MON 10/8/73 NBC 2-(448) NCLS Game                                     TUE 10/9/73 NBC 2-(507) & (507)-onward NLCS Game & ALCS Game                                     WED 10/10/73 NBC 2-(440) & (440)-onward NCLS Game & ALCS Game Doctors...3                    MON 10/8/73 NBC 2-(448) NCLS Game                                     TUE 10/9/73 NBC 2-(507) & (507)-onward NLCS Game & ALCS Game                                     WED 10/10/73 NBC 2-(440) & (440)-onward NCLS Game & ALCS Game Edge of Night...1                  WED 10/3/73 CBS 10AM-5PM: Watergate  General Hospital...0                Guiding Light...1            WED 10/3/73 CBS 10AM-5PM: Watergate  Love of Life...2          THU 10/11/73 ALL 11-1158AM: Eliot Richardson Press Conference                             TUE 10/23/73 ALL 11-1204PM: Eliot Richardson Press Conference One Life to Live...0              Return to Peyton Place...4    MON 10/8/73 NBC 2-(448) NCLS Game                                            TUE 10/9/73 NBC 2-(507) & (507)-onward NLCS Game & ALCS Game                                            WED 10/10/73 NBC 2-(440) & (440)-onward NCLS Game & ALCS Game                                            THU 10/11/73 NBC 330-(onward) ALCS Game Search for Tomorrow...1      THU 10/25/73 ABC & CBS 12-1PM (NBC 12-1238PM) Secretary Kissinger Press Conference  Secret Storm...2         WED 10/3/73 CBS 10AM-5PM: Watergate                                   THU 10/11/73 CBS 3-430PM CBS Daytime 90: Tiger on a Chain Somerset...4                        MON 10/8/73 NBC 2-(448) NCLS Game                                            TUE 10/9/73 NBC 2-(507) & (507)-onward NLCS Game & ALCS Game                                             WED 10/10/73 NBC 2-(440) & (440)-onward NCLS Game & ALCS Game                                             THU 10/11/73 NBC 330-(onward) ALCS Game Young and the Restless...1      THU 10/25/73 ABC & CBS 12-1PM (NBC 12-1238PM) Secretary Kissinger Press Conference   Baffle...0 Brady Bunch...2     THU 10/11/73 ALL 11-1158AM: Eliot Richardson Press Conference                             TUE 10/23/73 ALL 11-1204PM: Eliot Richardson Press Conference Captain Kangaroo...0 Dinah's Place...0 Gambit...2              THU 10/11/73 ALL 11-1158AM: Eliot Richardson Press Conference                               TUE 10/23/73 ALL 11-1204PM: Eliot Richardson Press Conference Girl in My Life...0 Hollywood Squares...2  THU 10/11/73 ALL 11-1158AM: Eliot Richardson Press Conference                                    TUE 10/23/73 ALL 11-1204PM: Eliot Richardson Press Conference Jeopardy...1                  THU 10/25/73 ABC & CBS 12-1PM (NBC 12-1238PM) Secretary Kissinger Press Conference Joker's Wild...1             WED 10/3/73 CBS 10AM-5PM: Watergate  Let's Make a Deal...0 Love, American Style...0               Match Game '73...2            WED 10/3/73 CBS 10AM-5PM: Watergate                                          THU 10/11/73 CBS 3-430PM CBS Daytime 90: Tiger on a Chain Newlywed Game...0 Password...1                        THU 10/25/73 ABC & CBS 12-1PM (NBC 12-1238PM) Secretary Kissinger Press Conference Price Is Right...2                         WED 10/3/73 CBS 10AM-5PM: Watergate                                           THU 10/11/73 CBS 3-430PM CBS Daytime 90: Tiger on a Chain Split Second...1                     THU 10/25/73 ABC & CBS 12-1PM (NBC 12-1238PM) Secretary Kissinger Press Conference $10.000 Pyramid...1            WED 10/3/73 CBS 10AM-5PM: Watergate  Three on a Match...0 Who, What or Where Game...0 Wizard of Odds...2       THU 10/11/73 ALL 11-1158AM: Eliot Richardson Press Conference                                    TUE 10/23/73 ALL 11-1204PM: Eliot Richardson Press Conference
    • @Paul Raven said: 1976 Pt 3 <snip> Victor, her words hitting upon him like tidal waves, pleads, “Dorian, don’t say any more,” as .he moves to the sofa, where he collapses, suffering a massive stroke. I remember watching a great deal of these scenes in all of your 1976 Pt 3. Amazing! And you are at the all time classic part of Dorian scheming against Victor.  Dorian was totally unsympathetic then, a true villain.
    • DEATH BY DEMOGRAPHICS IS `MURDER' MOST CRUEL That episode totally shaded CBS. Considering how CBS treated Angela Lansbury after all she did for CBS primetime, I don't blame her for reacting the way she did.
    • Do yourself a favor, don't google her blog.
    • @Errol there seems to be a malfunction in quoting that started happening a week or two ago.  PersonA posts something.  PersonB quotes PersonA and replies.  Then PersonC tries to quote what PersonB had quoted, and the *result* is that the original thing that PersonA said, becomes quoted as if had been originally said by PersonB. For example - PaulRaven posted on prior page this  (Link to PaulRaven original post) Then I myself janea4old quoted PaulRaven and replied  (Link.to.janea4old.quote.of.Paul.Raven.and.reply) Then @j swift tried to cite my PaulRaven quote, But the result was that PaulRaven's words were attributed to me janea4old. That happened above (Link to misattribution) Screencap of the glitch with misattribution of Paul's words to me:

      Please register in order to view this content

      *** Sorry everyone, I don't want to derail this thread, just wanted to post what happened on the page where it happened so that Errol could see it in context. J_swift is not to blame.  My theory is that this is a messageboard technical glitch.  I've seen this happen several times with various posters on various threads over the past week or two.  Quoted quotes being misattributed, and it happens with experienced posters who usually don't err in this way.  So I think there's a technical glitch in nested quoting.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy