Jump to content

Y&R: December 2016 Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Members

 

I think it's as good a premise as any. I go by major department stores everyday in this city that still have upscale brick and mortar but their online is lacking. How they keep it together is beyond me. I've been waiting to see a story like this on Y&R, and I like that Jack is taking advantage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

 

Other than Victor and Nikki, Dru and Neil, Nick and Sharon, and MAYBE either Danny and Christine or Paul and Christine Y&R just has never done supercouples well at all ever. I know even Bell tried to force Brad and Traci there in 1991 but it was so bad he finally relented. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

 No! Not one bit.

 

 I've been watching this show from the beginning and I've waited over 40 years for Jill be able to run Chancellor Industries. Even after Katherine died they gave it Victor. WTH! Jill wasn't even allowed to run her own home until now. So being white hasn't helped her even though she's had the decades of experience to do so. If Devon turns 65 and still isn't running his own company then I will understand the complaint.

 

Devon is not a Chancellor he's a Mccall/Winters. Jill was the one who married a Chancellor, the only one to bear Chancellor offspring, and the only character that had a relationship with Katherine for four decades. Katherine paid Devon out- more than all her other offspring combined, why would he be given Chancellor too?

 

 Devon is set to inherit McCall Unlimited, which is similar to Newman Enterprises and Chancellor Industries . But Devon running McCall (or Chancellor) would be as ridiculous as Genevieve buying and running Jabot. Inheriting $$$ to buy something doesn't make you instantly able to run it. Nick & Victoria have loads more business experience than Devon yet they don't run Newman, Victor does. Most of the young billionaire CEO's are self made.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I would consider those couples supercouples, in their own right, but Y&R definitely had the most number of characters that were either unattached or constantly bounced with different people.....I think Y&R had more popular pairings then anything, like Rex and Katherine, Jill and John, Jack and Nikki, Lauren and Scott or Lauren and Brad Ryan and Nina or Ryan and Victoria or Cole and Victoria ....but those were definitely not supercouples....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

And in more recent times people have tried to push Lame, Phick, and Villy so hard especially since the latter two were affairs not traditional romance lol.  As for Lauren and Scott when I look back on that pairing we had to see Lauren settle actually have to settle for fourth place after Paul, Brad and Jack and then have it blow up her face big time. I suppose that's how Bell planned Lauren's comeuppance? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Y&R has done supercouples. The difference between the way they do supercouples & other soaps is that members of one supercouple can be parts of other supercouples.


For instance Danny/Cricket & Paul/Cricket and Ryan/Victoria & Cole/Victoria were Y&R supercouples.

 

Then there were smaller pairings that were very popular like Danny/Patty, Brad/Traci, Brad/Lauren, Neil/Olivia, Malcolm/Olivia, Paul/Cassandra, Ryan/Nina, Victor/Diane, Lauren/Scott, Andy/Faren, Andy/Diane, etc.

 

Hell Victor is a supercouple three times over (Victor/Nikki, Victor/Ashley & Victor/Hope).

 

The problem began during Ed Scott's tenure when Y&R began throwing characters under the bus to prop Victor/Nikki & decided that Giggly Heffa was Jack's "soulmate"

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

That could have worked. The problem with the Devon/Katherine relationship was that it never existed. They had a couple nice scenes, that was it. Not only that the Tucker/Katherine story didn't really make Tucker part of the family. Most of Tucker's time was spent with Ashley. Tucker was never part of, and he had no interest in, the Chancellor/Reynolds clan.

 

Meanwhile viewers have been watching the relationship between Kay & Jill for decades. We should have saw some big things happen for Jill, since their lives were connected for all these years.

 

 

It was the worst.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Nick HAS run Newman Enterprises. The problem was he ran it into the ground.

 

And Victor's sexism would never let him allow Victoria to run Newman despite the fact that she's always been his most business driven child.

 

It's the same sexism that means Jess Walton's Jill can't start HER OWN company & be a power player in her OWN right instead of sponging off the Chancellor name 40 years later.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The supercouple trend should have stayed in the 1980s as it really ceased to be relevant in the 90s.

 

Bill Bell may not have entirely bought into the idea of a supercouple but he sure as hell had them and promoted them for awhile. Maybe though, he ended his focus on them at the right time, which turned out to be a smart move in the long run. Most other soaps stayed too long in that era.

 

Had Terry Lester been around today, you bet your sweet bippy, he would've winked at Lauren or called her "Sugar" or intimated in some way the closeness of their friendship.

Please register in order to view this content

 

Yes, this thread is getting loads of participation over the past few days. Funny, that's what some half-way competent writing will do, we all are interested enough to comment now. Hopefully the writing will have some longevity as it has been less than a week since the regime change has popped up onscreen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

It has nothing to do with sexism. Jill has cared about everything Chancellor since Y&R started in 1973.  Phillip Chancellor II being her first love, her first marriage, the mansion, the Chancellor offspring, Katherine's life, and the company. Chancellor had as much to do with Jill life as Katherines. Jill is not sponging, she earned every bit of it as we watched.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

There was a time Y&R used to have daily threads. A few years later it was weekly threads.

 

Under the last couple of regimes it dwindled to monthly threads with barely any posts.

 

So you're right that this has been the most discussion Y&R has prompted in a long time.

 

Katherine willed the money to Devon. As one of Katherine's grandchildren Devon deserves it. Jill has her own money. The end.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Just started the May 27 episode and first thing I see is that Willow got an ugly haircut since hte last time i watched
    • I'm pretty sure he was. But point taken.
    • Still here ^^ Come on Prime Video, it's due to bring it back!
    • Got through the eighth season, and it was... painful. 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I agree 100% with both you and Mitch64.  Soaps have been going further and further off-course since 1981. TPTB just don't have a fundamental understanding of what makes soap fans so loyal. I'd love to be on a writing team with both of you.  Maybe we could put together a real soap opera, and show people what its all about...  
    • They weren't in town, but Fletcher worked at the paper (and we saw anniversary Journal headlines for the 50th, although I don't remember if Roger was one of them), and I'd think Alex would have at least heard of him due to the damage he did to Spaulding only a few years before her return to the fold. I know I have to remember it's not real life, of course.
    • YES. The videos being uploaded to Spauldingfield are almost to the point where Alan is reintroduced. They're already talking about the guy he pretends to be, and yes, he returns at a masked ball. In fact, that masked ball is almost beat for beat the same as the masked ball where Alex was introduced! Get a new schtick. Before the Kobe era, that's pretty much what they did. Characters would just show up. Maybe other characters would talk about them for a while--the Chamberlains, Tony, Maureen, Andy, Kelly, Carrie--but then they would just appear. When Hope came back, she simply knocked on Bert's door and said something like, "Hi, Grandma, I'm home again." No particular fanfare. Sometimes it would be a bit dramatic--Jennifer and Morgan were introduced when Mike accidentally crashed into their car, for instance, and Alan and Elizabeth were introduced through Jackie's flashbacks when she was remembering giving up Phillip for adoption. Nola was involved in the Roger return. Roger's return in 1980 was very dramatic, but in a way that made total sense. He was trying to kidnap a child, so dressing up as a clown did not seem crazy. The mask bit was not only silly, it didn't even make sense. Alex never knew him, so there was no reason for him to be masked in front of her. Yeah, she knew OF him, but there's that phenomenon called cognetive dissonance. If you see someone outside of an expected situation, you probably won't recognize them, especially if you never met them in person and think they're dead. I bet a CIA spook like Roger would be familiar with that concept. And he didn't have to be skulking around SF for months. Again, I will cut Long a little slack--it was not her idea to bring back Roger, she was told to do it. She never wrote for the character. It was something that was not planned. They originally went to Zaslow to offer him the role of Alan. He, of course, turned them down because that was a ridiculous idea, but then he suggested coming back as Roger. At such short notice, it's not strange his return was not handled well.
    • Eh...but neither had been in town. Know the name Roger Thorpe? Sure. But Alex would have gone crazy trying to memorize all of Alan's co-conspirators/lovers/wives and Fletch didn't even know Roger/Adam was on the island, IIRC. But who knew or should've known each other is always a little dicey when people come back to town. 
    • I wouldn't call Tomas' cuts a modern cut. They appear to be a slim/extreme slim cut⏤cut slimmer down the sides, with a higher armhole, which pulls up/out, depending on the fit of the person's body. Again, I feel like Ms Featherstone is buying to fit the wrong parts of the body; instead of buying to fit their widest parts (shoulders), she's buying things to fit their middle/waist (which is the easiest to ultimately fix without a complete re-cut), and it shows in the finished product. And the only reason it irks me is because I worked in suit sales for nearly ten years, and I notice these things immediately. The fashion(s) on this soap are miles ahead of three of the four others (I like the fashions from Y&R), but the tailoring is a choice, especially where the men are concerned.
    • There probably would have been a good chance they knew of him, especially with his ties to Spaulding and his being involved in so much scandal (meaning there would be plenty of photos and articles around they both would have seen), but I agree the mask was silly, clearly just a TV moment.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy