Jump to content

Y&R: December 2016 Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Members

I'd also be shocked if 6 months down the road, SS will remember much of what she said in this interview because writers often change their minds, they get new ideas, they adapt material after learning what works and what doesn't.

 

Personally, the idea of a "Black consultant" is insulting and I'm saying this as a "Black writer".  Either you open up your writer's room to true diversity (which includes economic diversity as well as ethnic) or you don't and do what Daytime does with that "1 Black writer". 

I hate to say this but I think Daytime has an idea of what their writer's room looks like and they are either too lazy or set in their ways to change. I think our best hope is that the current writers have had enough experience writing what doesn't work to steer clear of that and write enough episodes that "work" for everyone.

 

Daytime's days of having anything that resembles a revolutionary storyline are over. Y&R has never been that soap anyway. What we can hope for is a soap that has good drama that is not utterly offensive while giving it's characters time to play with great dialogue and entertaining storylines. SSM did do that in 2 out of 3 episodes that she aired. I am just going to see where it leads but I am long past waiting for anything groundbreaking from daytime.

 

There are no August Wilson's or Eugene O'Neills in this group.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

 

I might agree is she didn't start with his lineage and inheritance. She's tying the lack of drive and ambition to having too much money. 

 

Chris, we all want to be wrong here, trust.  But YR has given us no reason to not be on guard. 

 

The difference in the white characters was immediate so I have to ask, why does SSM need more time with POC to redirect them?  My answer is, she doesn't intend to. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

I actually did like the writing for Devon and his relationship with Hilary, which is why I've left him out of this discussion for the most part. My complaints are about how Hilary is being stepped on so that Mariah can rise.  That, I do not like. 

 

And tbh, I would be less offended by that had Mal Young not explicitly said in an interview how he loves CG/Mariah and wants her to do more. Her doing  more seems to be at the expense of MiM/Hilary. This story is only written to benefit her. I don't like it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Whether Devon had $2B or $250M is immaterial. Sally would have said the exact same thing. This is not about the amount of money he has. It's about him having money at all.  Devon is now rich and this causes creative problems for her. He can not be her next Neil Winters,  bowing and scraping to Newmans or Abbots for his livelihood. She has to stretch her mind instead of using the shows proven formulas for black characters. She's uncomfortable. 

 

Because Sally has been told to write for Devon. To feature him.  And she's new to the gig and wants to deliver to her bosses the product that they want. Of Sally's first 8 scripts, Devon and Hilary are on at least 5. Maybe 6.They are on at least 4 days this week.  I doubt she'd do that unless it was a requested. Especially since her great 8 didn't include them. But writing for them is more difficult than she had anticipated. 

 

If he were white, he'd be running Chancellor Industries. I think we can all agree to that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Making Devon Katherine's grandson was dumb as sh*t and made zero sense. I would applaud Sally for undoing that..

Again I have to disagree with you there. Making Devon rich is just as difficult to write for as making, say.. Kevin rich. Its different than like the Abbott and Newman kids being born with a golden spoon in their mouth because there is all types of ways you can write their relationships with the dynamic of their families. Devon wasn't brought up that way and I just think people envisioned him differently. That doesn't mean a black person can't have money and be rich but it just feels so out out of left field that Devon would end up with all that money. I don't think Devon should have to cater to the Newmans or Abbotts either it's just I always pictured Devon building something up for himself. It doesn't mean Devon never should possess lots of  money. I just didn't think it would happen this way. I would have the same complaints about any other character as well. If Kevin or Michael or some other character we've come to know suddenly became a rich Newman, Abbott or Chancellor I'd be going "WHAT THE FK.."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Nope. Again I give a perfect example: a character like Kevin has been on about just as long as Devon, we didn't always know much about his parents or family. If Kevin suddenly became a chancellor people would not have accepted that. I'm never going to accept that Devon is a Chancellor, and I think my reasoning makes sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Interesting how relatively modest Devon lives considering his fortune. Except for a sports car, Devon tends to spend his fortune to benefit others, similar to what people who did not grow up in wealth tend to do after they acquire wealth.

 

What I find more glaring is the fact that uber-wealthy, to the manor born, Victoria and Nick who live like they are barely middle class as well as billionaire Victor Newman and Nikki living in what looks like an updated version of the Brady Bunch house. That seems to be a far bigger problem as it's extremely noticeable (the optics alone). Let's regard and treat all of these problematic situations with equal consideration.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I would think that Devon, with all his bucks, would have gone back to his love, a recording studio.  With his kind of money he could create a state of the art business that he'd actually enjoy.  I can never get why he and Hillary live in a hotel room.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Just saw Monday's episode. It was...not good.

 

This whole GC Buzz, the very concept, is a total clunker. I hate fake TV shows on shows I watch. I watch TV, I don't want to watch other people produce TV that doesn't even look like television. Also both Hillary and Mariah are about as charismatic on camera as Samantha Guthrie. And yes, that's an insult.

 

This is stupid. Hire a nanny, Nick. Don't try to play off this multi-millionaire like he's Mr. Mom.

 

Summer is useless. I can't believe she's Phyllis' daughter. Nick's, sure. But not Phyllis'.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

I keep thinking about her as this story plays out, I wasn't watching then but was the reaction to her and the story surrounding all the gossip she spread similar to this?

 

Because the very concept of GC Buzz makes no sense to me. They're taping the show in a break room. They do gossip and fashion shows? Millions of people are watching this LIVE? Why is the show suddenly live? Oh so Mariah can trip. 

 

AND I'm pretty sure that on any real TV show they'd clear the set because there's no way Hillary wasn't in that shot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Jean Hackney was awful and that lead to Ben's exit story which sucked. I liked Ben/Val together. Val's love for Ben was that of a grown woman moving on with her life and Ben's love for Val made him willingly decide to raise another man's children as his own.
    • It wasn't just a GL thing, it was an 80s thing. Opulent party scenes on soaps were very big back then. Even in regular episodes where people are just going to dinner they're dressed up like they're going to see royalty.
    • Just started the May 27 episode and first thing I see is that Willow got an ugly haircut since hte last time i watched   I dont have the context for how everthing went down but I know its all Lulu's fault which make her a bish for what she did to Gio
    • I'm pretty sure he was. But point taken. GL really had a thing for masked and costumed balls/parties in the '80's. Everyone looks fabulous, but those poor costume designers.
    • Still here ^^ Come on Prime Video, it's due to bring it back!
    • Got through the eighth season, and it was... painful. 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I agree 100% with both you and Mitch64.  Soaps have been going further and further off-course since 1981. TPTB just don't have a fundamental understanding of what makes soap fans so loyal. I'd love to be on a writing team with both of you.  Maybe we could put together a real soap opera, and show people what its all about...  
    • They weren't in town, but Fletcher worked at the paper (and we saw anniversary Journal headlines for the 50th, although I don't remember if Roger was one of them), and I'd think Alex would have at least heard of him due to the damage he did to Spaulding only a few years before her return to the fold. I know I have to remember it's not real life, of course.
    • YES. The videos being uploaded to Spauldingfield are almost to the point where Alan is reintroduced. They're already talking about the guy he pretends to be, and yes, he returns at a masked ball. In fact, that masked ball is almost beat for beat the same as the masked ball where Alex was introduced! Get a new schtick. Before the Kobe era, that's pretty much what they did. Characters would just show up. Maybe other characters would talk about them for a while--the Chamberlains, Tony, Maureen, Andy, Kelly, Carrie--but then they would just appear. When Hope came back, she simply knocked on Bert's door and said something like, "Hi, Grandma, I'm home again." No particular fanfare. Sometimes it would be a bit dramatic--Jennifer and Morgan were introduced when Mike accidentally crashed into their car, for instance, and Alan and Elizabeth were introduced through Jackie's flashbacks when she was remembering giving up Phillip for adoption. Nola was involved in the Roger return. Roger's return in 1980 was very dramatic, but in a way that made total sense. He was trying to kidnap a child, so dressing up as a clown did not seem crazy. The mask bit was not only silly, it didn't even make sense. Alex never knew him, so there was no reason for him to be masked in front of her. Yeah, she knew OF him, but there's that phenomenon called cognetive dissonance. If you see someone outside of an expected situation, you probably won't recognize them, especially if you never met them in person and think they're dead. I bet a CIA spook like Roger would be familiar with that concept. And he didn't have to be skulking around SF for months. Again, I will cut Long a little slack--it was not her idea to bring back Roger, she was told to do it. She never wrote for the character. It was something that was not planned. They originally went to Zaslow to offer him the role of Alan. He, of course, turned them down because that was a ridiculous idea, but then he suggested coming back as Roger. At such short notice, it's not strange his return was not handled well.
    • Eh...but neither had been in town. Know the name Roger Thorpe? Sure. But Alex would have gone crazy trying to memorize all of Alan's co-conspirators/lovers/wives and Fletch didn't even know Roger/Adam was on the island, IIRC. But who knew or should've known each other is always a little dicey when people come back to town. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy