Members dragonflies Posted August 7, 2015 Members Share Posted August 7, 2015 Under the "Stuff we know and shouldn't tell you": Fans would be surprised to know how many heavy hitters on this soap are working without contracts My guess: Days or GH Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Webmaster Errol Posted August 7, 2015 Webmaster Share Posted August 7, 2015 Days of our Lives Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members dragonflies Posted August 7, 2015 Author Members Share Posted August 7, 2015 Wow really? Must be why they're getting so many vets returning Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Taoboi Posted August 7, 2015 Members Share Posted August 7, 2015 The times they are a-changing... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Gray Bunny Posted August 7, 2015 Members Share Posted August 7, 2015 Despite the past couple years and their general dissatisfaction with their storyline, the longtime actors on this show still show a lot of support and want the show to succeed and continue to air. I'm not surprised if a lot of them, even the returning ones, are recurring. Haven't people like John Aniston and Bryan Dattilo been recurring for years? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members cassadine1991 Posted August 7, 2015 Members Share Posted August 7, 2015 Yeah, both Susan and Bill as well have been recurring for years too Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members edgeofnik Posted August 8, 2015 Members Share Posted August 8, 2015 With a show like DAYS that clearly is barely scraping by financially, it makes complete sense. If you look at current cast, there are only nine I'd keep on contract: KA, LK, JL EM, KM, CM, MR, GV and AZ. OK, I'll make it 10 and keep SC because I like him, but Daniel, not-so-much. All the rest could go on recurring. The vets who are coming back aren't going to bring in the demo ratings, which is what matters (even 25-54). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members ranger1rg Posted August 8, 2015 Members Share Posted August 8, 2015 Why is this a blue no item anyway? Are soap magazines and journalists that afraid of pissing off TPTB on my he soaps? Ridiculous. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members DaytimeFan Posted August 8, 2015 Members Share Posted August 8, 2015 I would think it's DAYS, particularly based on the returning vets for the 50th anniversary. The cast members who have consistent appearance numbers are the ones you can bet are still on contract, but those who rotate on and off the front burner are likely recurring. John Aniston has been recurring since 1999. Bryan Dattilo has been recurring since 2012. Judi Evans, Wally Kurth, Mary Beth Evans have all been or are recurring and received decent writing and storylines. I can't imagine that Josh Taylor, Peggy McKay, James Reynolds are on contract at the behest of Ken Corday for anything except an issue: health insurance. Recurring is really only a problem, aside from inconsistent income if the show doesn't know how to write a balanced cast, in one issue: health insurance, those who are recurring don't get network or Sony health insurance. Of course, they still have their SAG-AFTRA insurance, but it isn't the same. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Taoboi Posted August 11, 2015 Members Share Posted August 11, 2015 Have been. SOD reported a while ago that JE, WK, and MBE are back on contract on sure. It was part of the reason RC had to finally write WK's Ned off of GH after two years (?) of Wally (and same with ED at Days/Y&R) rotating between Days and GH. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Sindacco Posted August 11, 2015 Members Share Posted August 11, 2015 This is what John Aniston said back in 2000 about why he doesn't have a contract. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.