Jump to content

Can GH go on without Maurice Benard?


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 49
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

And that's my point :) if a show was willing to go on without its most popular character (who also happens to be the industry's most iconic character played by its most famous actress), why wouldn't GH forge ahead without a Sonny Corinthos? That said, Erica couldn't make or break the reboot, her absence had nothing to do with PP's bag of BTS issues that tanked them. Many fans were happy with what was playing out on screen. Years ago, I attended a forum with Agnes Nixon and some AMC actors. I asked Mrs. Nixon something to the effect of, What is it about characters like Erica and Rachel that make them stars, how is it that they become the face of their shows? I was mortified as she furled her brow and cocked her head to the side snapping, When you think of AMC do you only think of Erica? What about all of the other characters, it's not just Erica.... She misinterpreted my question but I of course never forgot how passionate she was about the old "one monkey don't stop no show" adage, even if we were talking Susan Lucci. That's why I get annoyed with stans who claim a show with fall without such and such, who is usually an actor hardly worth the adoration. We all have our favorites, but come on people. Any writer worth his or her paycheck should be able to finesse the loss of a major character and transition the show into its future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

When the ratings were bigger, and the stars were bigger daytime stars, the shows survived them exiting by having other root able characters and good stories. Days didn't fold either time Marlena left. Or Hope, Patch, etc. GL thrived without Reva. AMC survived the loss of Jenny. GH had an entire second golden era without any of their mid 1980's superstars except Felicia. In 1989, I could not have imagined GH without Anna, Frisco, Robert, Felicia. But in 1994 I didn't even miss them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

IA with Ellabelle that it isnt a fair comparison. The show only had like 4 months worth of episodes (less bc they had to stretch it out). One can say that thats not enough time to say it was a failure without Susan Lucci but at the same time, how can one say its a success?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Very fair point. I think the last time I truly felt invested in any story regarding Sonny was when he was with Tamara Braun's Carly, who played the most to his strengths. Since then it's been a slow descent to where he is now. His children, ironically don't help this. His character has aged poorly -- which is something that didn't have to happen. Sonny as a character should still have purpose, and he does at least on paper, but it doesn't translate well on screen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Every show has lost major characters at some point and survived or even prospered back to the days of Jeff on ATWT.

Yet like in so many other areas TPTB are scared and keep characters way past their use by date,especially in recent times where 'villianous' characters are still walking around town,not having paid for their crimes.

I'm talking about you Victor Newman!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yes no one character makes the show. I remember when Roger Howarth left the show in 1998 at OLTL everyone thought it would tank . OLTL without him in 1999 went up in ratings and hit number 1 demos when Dorian hit and ran Jessica and it also in 2000 brought Emmy nods and OLTL was nominated for best show.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

GH would exist just fine. The problem over the years has been the soaps and the brass shoving people down our throats as the leads. That's why fans freak when their favorites bolt. Look at the meltdown Y&R fans had when Miller and Stafford left. Lord. If soaps were an ensemble and not "Phyllis and the Restless" "Mobster Hospital" or "Daniel of Our Lives" we'd be better off in the long-run. It's a bad ABC mentality, IMO, and it stemmed from the supercouple syndrome IMO. What they fail to realize is that supercouples were surrounded by other couples and it wasn't JUST about them.

Honestly, Benard should have gone. I'm sure he wants a paycheck, I don't blame him, but Sonny as a character is done, IMO. Have him be a supporting player since he's sticking around I guess and call it a day. This was the perfect Sonny swan song, but nooooo. Sigh. He also should have stayed gone in 1998.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm sure it would, but it's so bad now I prefer the familiarity of Sonny's character to the nauseous feeling I get when Franco and Nina are on my screen[which feels like every day!]. Another redemption story with Sonny[while repetitive], beats the pet shop we have to tolerate to catch the glimpses of the characters we like!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I found it to be a rather odd way to deal with a character departing for parts unknown.
    • Today reminded me as to why I’m a little disappointed in the name that the new Pope chose

      Please register in order to view this content

      Luckily, EJ and Johnny, and pretty much every other character saved today’s episode.  I didn’t expect Javi to be the one to save Sarah though, and I don’t mind it at all, because if it means that Javi is finally going to get his own identity/character, away from his douchy bf, I’m all for it. Javi’s scenes would’ve been a lot better had it not been for him. EJ and Johnny were the best part of today. Their conversation hit a lot of important beats and I’m so looking forward to seeing them play out. And now that EJ knows that Johnny is going to work for Xander, that opens up another dynamic to their storyline and to the Kiriakis family storylines as well. Tying them all together could be really good. There are so many story possibilities that can come out of this. And I thought Carson Boatman did a pretty good job again too.  I also liked that Johnny was there to comfort Chanel after everything that happened with Sarah. They’re so good together. But I do have mixed feelings about Chanel possibly forgiving Johnny so quickly. Hopefully, the question that she asked him at the end of today leads to more conflict for the two of them.  And yeah, still no changes in Alex’s character lol 
    • Awesome, thanks so much for taking the time to grab this episode. I had a quick review of your rip because I was curious why it was 700MB and 30 minutes. The first 10 minutes of the episode is 3169 (opening credits at 5 minutes and again at 15 minutes). I thought we had the full HD version of ep.3170 on the YouTube channel, but it appears they added the wrong episode but labelled it 3170. 
    • I guess, according to Mike Manning in the Michael Fairman chat, he was almost Derek 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • OIC Thanks. I saw thzt & looked for a prior  ... never mind. 
    • I imagine Brad will blow through all the money in a year and come crawling back, just as Portia warned him not to.
    • Please register in order to view this content

         
    • That's a name I haven't heard in a minute. Thanks! 
    • Well, since I'm still up unexpected past my growing-into-it bedtime. lol.   I finally got to rewatch Monday's. I even rewatched Friday's to take it all in. Now that we got the reveal and hit the climax of the SilkPress Sheila storyline, now we get to watch the aftermath and/or turns that come with its climax. So far, so good. Friday left us with three cliffhangers. And what I found surprising was how I felt about them over a rewatch.    I know some of you all felt a way about the dialogue during Kat vs Eva. I remember liking it more the first time around and it was nice for them to have these scenes to establish more of a frenemy vibe for them going forward. That still held up. But I found myself agreeing with you all about that dialogue. lol. Still, it was nice to have both of their POVs.   Second up was Silk Press Sheila vs the Duprees. And I was happy to get a brief spat with Dani in there. But the rest standouts for me was Anita and Martin. Haters can hate and given the tail end of the episode, I will agree to a fault, but Brandon has impressed and he was on fire on Monday and had great subtle work on Friday. And that subtle work made it all the better. Like I believe I said when I was watching...BC has a much better grip on his character and seems to be realizing what his tics are so has started to be able to know when to turn it up and when to dial it down. And for the most part (emphasis on most), he got that. Meanwhile, TT was giving fierceness, and I was here for every minute of it. Her reading SilkPress. Her being quip about it. Her 'BE STILL.' Ooooo she had a chokehold on me as Anita gave what I was expecting her to SilkPress. WORTH THE WAIT. I also loved Vernon's CHOOSE SILENCE. I wonder though if SilkPress will figure out Martin's condition from her observing Anita and Vernon with him.   And speaking of worth it...Oooo YES Nicole vs Ted was worth totally worth it. Oooooo I knew DD would nail it, and it was all so well done. The fight between the part of Nicole who is a therapist vs Nicole as a woman who wants to express how she feels. And being so angry. And how there would be moments when it would shoot out of her. And how she would restrain herself. But how she felt she should not be restrain. Just the levels of processing and layers. And DD played it all so well. I do wish Maurice gave just a little bit more, but overall, I thought he did a good job even if it was just Ted coming across as a deadbeat and not at all redeemable. And Kat being there for her mother was so beautiful.   Minority, but I love the montage though yes, it did run a little long. Given how the Duprees like to bond (and also as I mentioned from my own very recent family experiences), it did not seem out of place to me.     That said...let's see how the aftermath worked in today's episode. Overall. Cuz RC can be hit or miss. 
    • I wonder whose brilliant (

      Please register in order to view this content

      ) idea it was to do an almost complete rip-off of the "who killed Tom King"-storyline. That's some quality style writing right there.....  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy