Members alphanguy74 Posted October 14, 2014 Author Members Share Posted October 14, 2014 To tell you the truth, i'm not entirely sure who has the power to do it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Max Posted October 14, 2014 Members Share Posted October 14, 2014 Alphanguy, this is a good question, but based on everything that I have read it is the White House that has the power to do this. http://abcnewsradioonline.com/politics-news/lawmakers-demand-obama-institute-west-africa-travel-ban.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members marceline Posted October 14, 2014 Members Share Posted October 14, 2014 Oh Max your concern trolling never ceases to entertain. Sorry but politics have real world consequences. People always say "this isn't the time for politics" when there's a crisis but when the crisis is over they go right back to magical thinking and doubling down on bad policy. Perry hates the government but when he needs help he comes running with his hand out. We have no Surgeon General right now because of the NRA. We cut funding for the NIH. Texas refused Medicare expansion. These are all political decisions with real world effects. Imagine if this had happened during the government shutdown. Remember all the crowing from the right that it wasn't a shutdown but instead was just a vacation for lazy Federal workers? Those lazy Federal workers are the ones who are now in Texas trying to keep secessionists from getting sick. I wonder if they'll ever get so much as a thank you. Right wingers will never have to truly live according to the beliefs they espouse because the people they hate always protect them. I've just gotten to the point where I'm no longer willing to do that. Fortunately for you and the people of Texas all those dreaded liberals and the tyrannical Federal government will once again come running to the rescue and when this is all over the Republicans in Congress will go back to shutting down the government to defund Obamacare and denying emergency funding for the next Hurricane Sandy all while blaming the President they are suing and wanting to impeach for doing not enough except when he's doing too much. The party of so-called personal responsibility will once again be protected from actually having to take any. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members DRW50 Posted October 14, 2014 Members Share Posted October 14, 2014 These people see science as the enemy. Notice how the media, and many in the public, have already framed this as scientists hiding things and lying. The only solution many come up with is to close the borders. If we close the borders, we are automatically safe, and all those unworthy people will never touch us. We'll be safe because we're good and strong and pure. You know the saddest part? I wouldn't be surprised if the media and the GOP actually use this as an excuse to cut funding even more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Max Posted October 14, 2014 Members Share Posted October 14, 2014 Your naked partisanship and plain nastiness really just want to make me throw up. I am no fan of the NRA, but they were not the only ones opposing Vivek Murthy's appointment as Surgeon General. Former Surgeon General Richard Carmona--the 2012 Democratic nominee for U.S. Senate in Arizona--felt that Murthy was too young and inexperienced to hold the position: http://washingtonexaminer.com/vivek-murthy-shouldnt-be-confirmed-as-surgeon-general/article/2546421 And an opinion piece in the liberal Boston Globe questioned Murthy's credentials for the job, wondering if his appointment was due more to his political involvement than this professional achievements: http://www.bostonglobe.com/opinion/2013/12/09/vivek-murthy-too-partisan-surgeon-general/vzG7JAOAj9TZPZOVf7AQCI/story.html If singlehandedly blaming "cuts" to the NIH for the Ebola crisis makes you feel better, go ahead. Many believe that the organization had adequate resources, and there is plenty of waste in the federal bureaucracy. http://reason.com/blog/2014/10/13/can-you-blame-ebola-outbreak-on-republic I've already stated that the government shutdown (that happened last year) was idiotic, and even many other Republicans feel the same way. Given that it lasted only a few weeks, however, I highly doubt that it is responsible for Ebola in any way. You still continue to blame Republicans for everything plus the kitchen sink (and, yes, they do deserve some blame). But you amazingly continue to suggest that the other side is totally blameless. And you start calling names (e.g. "trolls") the moment anybody questions you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members alphanguy74 Posted October 14, 2014 Author Members Share Posted October 14, 2014 I think some people see science as the enemy, but many like me, certainly don't in this case. I think borders need to be closed to those countries for now because of the outbreak, plain and simple, and if the disease were in Sweden and Norway, I'd say the exact same thing. I'ts not a matter of those people not being worthy to walk amongst us, it's a matter of them being sick and not spreading a deadly illness. Only in america with this massive victim mentality and racial baggage do you find these type of sentiments. Elsewhere in the world, people are more pragmatic.And let's keep in mind, the borders of Senegal, Chad, and Ivory Coast have already been closed, and travel severely limited in Kenya and South Africa. The airline worker's union in Europe is pressuring air France to halt all flights to and from Sierra Leone, Guinea, and Liberia. And people DO put too much trust in scientists and medical officials, how many times have they been wrong? Scientists, and officials we could TRUST told us DDT was safe in the 50's. They told soldiers that agent orange wouldn't harm them, the list goes on and on. And you want us to blindly trust now? You can do it if you want, but you'd be a fool. The main reason people are calling BS on the way this is being handled, is because the method of transmission is being framed as "Direct contact with bodily fluids", they are framing it as being transmitted in the same way that AIDS and Hepatitis are transmitted, but all the while using isolation and hazmat suits when handling patients. I don't think officials are downright LYING, I they are downplaying so as not to cause mass hysteria, because from Ferguson, we know what happens when there is mass hysteria. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members DRW50 Posted October 14, 2014 Members Share Posted October 14, 2014 Our brilliant media in action yet again. What a [!@#$%^&*] joke. http://www.people.com/article/nancy-snyderman-ebola-quarantine-apology Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Vee Posted October 14, 2014 Members Share Posted October 14, 2014 I really hope they fire her on top of that non-apology. They're taking a lot of heat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Max Posted October 14, 2014 Members Share Posted October 14, 2014 Thanks for this excellent post, Alphanguy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Juliajms Posted October 14, 2014 Members Share Posted October 14, 2014 Now there is someone I'd like to see get some jail time. What a self entitled wench. Here's an interesting article laying out some reasons why a travel ban might be a bad plan. I'm sort of on the fence with this issue. Mostly I think the international community should be throwing every resource at Ebola at the source. http://www.vox.com/2014/10/13/6964633/travel-ban-airport-screening-ebola-outbreak-virus Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members marceline Posted October 14, 2014 Members Share Posted October 14, 2014 I just don't see how a travel ban could work. Let's say we ban all flights from West Africa. There's nothing stopping people from catching a flight to some other country then simply transferring to a plane here. It also makes it harder to get aid workers to and from the affected area. For all the talk about airports I'm more curious about our ports and waterways. Ebola can also spread through bats and eating infected meat. Consider how many ships make their way to our ports complete with workers from all over the world and all manner of cargo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Juliajms Posted October 14, 2014 Members Share Posted October 14, 2014 Sure, we could stop that just by looking at a persons passport (at least to a large degree) if we really wanted to, but in the end it's all just a distraction. The politicians who talk about doing this are just trying to placate people, imo. I think it's possible a travel ban would stop a few infections, but it would probably cause a lot of economic damage. I don't see it as a practical solution because I don't think we have a real problem with Ebola spreading here. The flu will kill more people in the US this winter then Ebola, imo. I thought that Vox article was interesting, but they had a few straw man arguments in there. For example a travel ban wouldn't really have to stop aid workers either. Flights could just go one way for a couple of months, while we get this under control. Better yet, there should be government/military flights taking aid workers straight to the source. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Juliajms Posted October 14, 2014 Members Share Posted October 14, 2014 Chris Brown got himself into trouble with this: http://www.thewrap.com/chris-brown-draws-outrage-after-calling-ebola-epidemic-a-form-of-population-control/ He's right though. War and disease have been a source of population control. I don't think acknowledging that means you want war and disease to win the battle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members ThePrinceOfSunspear Posted October 14, 2014 Members Share Posted October 14, 2014 Max I agree What a load of horseshit. The reason flight travel hasn't been suspended is because of money and because in some ways it's almost unfeasible to do. But let me not get in the way of your steretypical race baiting bullsh*t. As for Texas it's not Republicans fault that the Duncan guy lied. However the Republicans in Texas should take responsiblity for the state of their healthcare system such that it is. I don't know much about the healthcare system there so I won't cast judgement on it. But the fact that Perry is so anti-federal government is laughable considering how much Texas needs them now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members marceline Posted October 14, 2014 Members Share Posted October 14, 2014 Agreed but talking about scientific reality almost always makes for bad tweets. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.