Jump to content

GH: April 2014 Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Chances are, though, Veronica would create two dozen new characters: one dozen for the purpose of solving the mystery, the other dozen to replace those the killer eliminates.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

She couldn't come on playing "Tamara Braun" and be great. This is the woman who they fired Natalia Livingston for on DOOL and then classic and comically proved even worse and got fired herself. She was awful on GH, beyond awful. And perhaps we could chalk that up to her being young, but then she went on DOOL--twice--and wasn't up to the task either time. She had one good week on DOOL maniacally saying "PATCH!" every sentence, but that was about it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
to be fair there was NOTHING that could save the Taylor story as the character has always been awful and the writing was just dreadful. The character needed to be axed when NL was playing her, not recast

ETA: The Nina story is so stupid and makes no sense and if Ava falls for this latest plan than she truly is an idiot. I mean does she not realize that the paper saying that the pharmacist is alive is the one that her brother publishes, the same brother that JUST accused her of murder? She knows that his daughter is trying to pin it on her. And why would some local paper in PC be reporting this? Why not do a google search and see what turns up in NYC bc if the PC Herald is the only source, then something should be fishy right there. Also, if the guy was so sick and nearly died a few weeks ago, why would he be transfered all the way upstate? Why wouldnt the police question him where he currently is and in private without alerting the press ahead of time? There are SOOOO many red flags and holes to this yet for the sake of the plot, Ava will likely ignore all this and fall into their trap. Logically it makes absolutely no sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You know the killer would just end up being Monica who finally snaps. The town killed her family one by one, so she is on a rampage to kill everyone else. Poor us if RC tried to have LC recreate Gwen's scene from Loving when she came face to face with what she had done

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Absolutely! Brad should've simply moved on from Lunacy. There's no point of freeing her, if you're not going to at least make an attempt at redemption or incorporating her into the fold. It happened with Quinn, who committed quite a few felonies before become the Forrester Matriarch.  Heck, keep Lunacy in prison and have Poppy/Finn discover that she gave birth to twins - 'Sunny' could've come on with a clean slate and still had Sheila/Finn and all the other drama. It certainly couldn't have been worse than what we've witnessed with the destruction of $B.    
    • I would enjoy it if Swan popped up on BTG as an old one time friend/mentor of Anita’s for a cameo. This is just

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I had totally forgotten that Courtney story. I see Burton was already phoning it in by that point.
    • omg I completely missed that, but now when I see it typed here in your post, it's obvious icky cringe. So now I just checked and Tomas said that -- on May 27 that he likes the author Carl Ivati.  He said it with sort of an accent, so I didn't catch the stupid joke or think about the spelling.   I remember when that aired, that I actually said to myself at the time, "I wonder if that's a Latin American author, and I will have to google him later." And now I see your post, and I see. Well that's cringe, and I feel stupid to have fallen for it.

      Please register in order to view this content

         
    • There's a lot you don't need if you have the writing.  You don't even need large casts!  You could make do with a cast of 12-18 actors if the writing is there.
    • Thank you. There’s absolutely nothing wrong with sleeping around if your spouse actually knows about it. She’s just a cheating slut.
    • OMG...Robert Mandan! And Donna Mills is a child. I keep hoping for more of early Ross/Vanessa.
    • I get your point, but I also know that if the roles were reversed -- if a man were screwing around on a woman this way -- everyone would be all "All with his head!" When I say Vanessa needs therapy, I'm actually being kind, because I could begin and end with the fact that she's a cheating slut.
    • Is nobody going to mention the cringefest that is 'Carl Ivati'?
    • I've accepted we'll probably never see any of the Roger/Holly 1976-1978 storyline. Whenever any of Roger/Holly 1979 and 1980 storylines surface, those are must watch as they set in motion everything we saw a decade later.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy