Jump to content

Y&R: February 2014 Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 727
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Personally speaking (and dare I suggest it's not so much the point of contention) I find there is a natural or striking beauty in Amelia Heinle. What I think is up for debate, justly or unjustly, is how it's presented on a regular basis (hair, etc). As for the gap in her teeth, for every one person who finds it off putting, there is one person who believes it enhances beauty.

As a man, I find the double standard detailed above astounding. I'll compare it to the kind of misogyny that exists in the UK media. Our television news features men up to their 60's who probably wouldn't be considered pin-ups, whereas their female co-anchors generally are younger and prettier. Though I find the specific issue highlighted is less of a contentious issue over. It's written as a woman who has sex appeal that transcends generations. Denise and Fatboy in Eastenders, Tracy Barlow and Ryan Connor in Coronation Street, Sandy Roscoe and Dodger in Hollyoaks as 'heightened' examples.

As he has been directly referenced, I'll address the suggestion that a poster is trolling. Whilst I think he's just stating his opinions (aren't we all?) where I think the problems lie is the somewhat 'provocative' tone that can sometimes manifest itself. The 'last laugh, deal with it, nothing you can do about it, Ha Ha Ha' tone that can rub people the wrong way. I nearly didn't write this bit for fear of being dragged into something I have no care to be, but I just wanted to defend one poster's freedom to express his views whilst showing said poster where possibly some of these issues are coming from.

Oh, and I must be an odd cat, as I see the attraction in both AH and Heidi Montag. AND I still think Cynthia Watros is very appealing. Lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think AH has a unique face, and I like the small gap in her teeth [just like my dearly departed Sophie Deveraux on The Originals]. AH's hair is so hideous that I can't stand to see Victoria coming. I guess she's no longer a business woman, but now she just looks like the rebellious offspring of wealthy people. Victoria Newman should not be looking like this!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well, that is a good thing. It's a soap and teens should be problems. So I don't see an issue there.

Crayon scene...they have been showing those kids alot lately. If I didn't know better and we had not already had Delia die a few months ago, I would predict one of those kids would be headed for soap heaven...I think one might get sick though. Maybe. The scenes are definitely throw away scenes. I assume the writers treat those kids like they do everything Winters and rarely write for them properly. There is a huge difference in how they use Faith than how they use Charlie and Maddie. Faith adds to the show when she is on...twins, not at all. Unsurprising though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It's well known that I'm not a fan of AH, because her acting comes across as lazy - a lot. If it was a different role, I could probably accept it easier. (It's also tough because watching HT just kill it on B&B daily does prejudice me.) I decided that I'm going to cut her a break and see how she works with DT as well as SC - I've actually enjoyed their interaction. That being said, she is an attractive woman, especially since she is much lighter on the make-up than most. She even admits that the hair is a problem, so she's not oblivious. In many ways, she reminds me of CC and Mary Williams, but Mary was a middle-class mom, not a Newman heiress. In other words, while I'm not going to be a stan, I am going to be more kind to AH going forward.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Even on a soap a parent should be able to handle their kids though. Even when they are bratty teens. People often made fun of GH's Alexis for cowering like she was afraid ever time her teens would start.

Well the girl who plays Faith can probably handle a lot more dialog better too. She's also on some Disney show and I saw her on Instant Mom going up against Tia Mowry playing an obnoxious brat. I don't find these scenes of the kids making their art projects cute though. And if they can't really act I'd rather them not be given a lot of lines. That little girl who played Delia was annoying . And the children's triangle on GH has me watching less and less.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

They don't have to be able to remember lots of dialogue to be used better. All I am saying is just have them significant to the story. There are plenty things they could do with them. They just don't do it.

Rebellious teens are a soap staple...I have yet to see one parent who could control their kid. Dru never cowered to Lily but she couldn't do a thing with that girl either. Neither Lauren or Michael cowered to Fen but he was one disrespectful brat whom they couldn't do a thing with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Lily has her issues with Hilary, they could have them meet hilary one day while out with neil and think she is great. Have her rescue that dog Humphrey from peril. Then have them bragging about her heroics. Thereby fueling lily's jealousy. Simple things like that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Someone apparently told Brad Bell that "playing all the beats" meant repeating the same dialogue every day.
    • Please register in order to view this content

      Steal her away from Y&R and make her "Sharon".  
    • -- I continue to enjoy DAYS post-Carlivati. These women have done a great job in refocusing the show. -- It sounds nuts not to agree with "rapists and murderers shouldn't be romantic leads." But then you get characters like Xander and EJ, and you have to put an asterisk after that quote. I enjoy both characters far too much to want them off the show or thrown in jail. They're romantic leads, but you can't tell me they haven't faced consequences. -- I think the Xander beatdown of Phillip was well-directed -- and in character. Some people here believe Xander went too far. Well, that's who Xander is, and we've seen that many times over these past years. He thought he had family, and then realized it was all a lie, so he resorted back to his animal roots. -- The Stephanie Racy Book storyline is soooooo bad. I had to laugh that she couldn't find her manuscript in that 2x4 apartment.
    • Both Philip and Xander should be in jail, period.
    • 5-14   AMMMMMMMMMYYYYYYYYY!!! Thank the Lord! lol. But at least I now have something of interest to watch. So good to see Audra and Amy reunited. hehe. I also liked the continued bonding between Damian and Nate. Side-note...those pants on SD and all of that cake is PERFECTION. Mmmm.   I also enjoyed the continued dragging of Billy. First by the son. And then by the father. lol. Billy standing there and being so insufferable and wonder why people are giving him the business. He can stay at that bar and STFU. Double for Chelesa.    And ugh at Giggly Heffa wasting Victor's (and the audience's) time with her inability to spit it out. At least she made up for it by calling Dumas directly. I was just talking about how I love near-miss in the BTG thread, but the difference here is that the Dumas part of the Damian storyline has gone on too long. So her near-miss was annoying. 
    • Agreeing with your agreeing, and I bet that any urge toward violence against Sarah is what will cause Xander to try to redeem himself. Even though, as you mentioned the other day, I have enjoyed the buildup.  It seems like everyone easily forgave Philip for stealing from Xander.  And their defense was that Victor wanted his two sons to work together.  Until, finally, Xander exploded and realized that Victor wanted what he wrote in his will, days before his death.  If Philip had led an actual legal battle for the estate, then Xander might have capitulated.  But, Philip made him look like a fool.  Because Philip was too smug to simply ask Xander for what he thought he deserved.  I was shocked/enthralled by how raw they allowed Xander to express his rage.  I don't think that would have been allowed before streaming, yet they show people with guns weekly on GH.  I also want to point out that there is still the inorganic nature that neither person in a fight can swear, that I always find distracting. noted for the contrarians, that is not a defense for violence  -- I assume we are all of sound mind, and know right from wrong. - I also know it airs on network TV in other countries, so they still abide by network daytime standards. - blah blah blah
    • I imagine Philip will refuse to identify Xander because he knows he orchestrated this mess and tanked his brother's marriage. Eventually I hope to see Philip and Xander reconciling their awful crimes against each other and restoring that brother bond.  And Xander needs therapy. He was twisted into what he is by Victor's cruelty and has zero anger management skills. Having said that I think this was more a gross writing choice than anything else. One punch would have sufficed for sure but they wanted to show us Sarah was "right". Never mind that she created this situation by helping Xander love his brother so the betrayal was far worse. If he'd heard the truth immediately he would have had Philip arrested and fired him. But Sarah wanted Philip to be her mole to control her husband at work. Who never needed it as he's run Titan just fine on his own before.
    • Oh that's right. Thanks. Thanks @dc11786 I guess Conroy did last for a bit. Never knew why AW didn't see his potential either.
    • May 19, 2025 Fairman interviews Lynn Herring about the Nurses Ball. Excellent interview and no GH spoilers. CAUTION There is a minor DAYS spoiler from 12:15 to 14:15, so if you are Days spoiler-free, then skip those two minutes. Thus intentionally posting the link instead of embedding the youtube.. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tYXKsKa1xTE
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy