Jump to content

AMC Tuesday, August 23, 2011


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Not to mention lesser instances like the horrioble Tanner Jordan/Hayley mess. Even in the ca 86-87 era of AMC when she was listed as HW, she had a thing for these larger than life villains.

I still think very highly as a HW (more than you do, I know), but it's not for these types of stories which are her weakness. (OK, I did find the Jonathan Kinder saga kinda fun I hate to admit).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 113
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

This is an example of a story I just blame the crunch of time left for the show, for. I think it's well done, actually, it's just going at too quick a trot--but it still seems to be covering the basic a-b-c of storytelling better than, say, the way Carlivati at OLTL does with his much more dragged out stories which typically just go from A, repeated over and over, to C with no progress. If that makes sense...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Krystal was a rewrite from the start. Remember her first scene, Babe was kinda hesitant to talk much about her, and we saw Babe call her and Krystal was whoring it up in some trashy motel, the implication was she would now go to Pine Valley because her daughter had scored a rich guy and she could live off that. But as soon as she showed up next, basically, she was pretty much how she is now, albeit still a bit more trashy, but with a heart of gold who would do anything for her daughter. The implication before was she essentially abandoned Babe as much as she could.

Frankly, that original characterisation would have made a lot more sense, and made Babe's character make a lot more sense (and even maybe more likeable--although I liked Babe fine).

That is one instance where I appreciate the speed actually. I hate revelations like that held out SO SO long, eve n if saying it one episode later is very short.

PLEASE, you are not the ABC news interrupting soaps (or soap discussion) go off topic.

;)

Once again, agreed with everything 100% (But you East Coasters need to get over the earthquake, we have them every couple of weeks here in Victoria BC). :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yep, she was trailer trash and Babe was more sympathetic that way. She didn't give a rat's ass about poor Babe, feeling lonely with her billionaire hubby. She was having some tawdry affair in a no-tell motel. Heck, even when she showed up in town she gave that doctor a BJ to help fake the paternity of Babe's unborn child. THAT scene I will never forget.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I can't remember, who did he kill under Broderick?

Aww, back when they had hospital staff who weren't just the three main characters and a nameless doctor (the Paging Dr Bender doesn't count). Dr Clater (though I think different actors) was on for at least 20 years, as was shrink Dr Tolan it seemed (who was played by several actresses).

She was watching her weight and said no to the food and drink, remember? :P

He was absolutely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yep the dreaded Jean Passanante year (after Agnes left as co-headwriter)--though I believe the Jesse turns back time bit was actually the Fall when, amidst rumours of her firing, Jean Passanante broke her contract and left AMC (and was shockingly picked up by ATWT) and for a good four months AMC had no HW, until Culliton was hired. Probably my least fave era of AMC ever (which is really saying somethign considering Pratt's last year, some of McTavish, the Rayfield mess...)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I do think Eakes is incredibly likable but I just don't think she works as this Martin matriarch they were trying to pass her off as for an indefinite amount of time. It's like she is this just a place holder for Ruth/Myrtle and every female comes to her with their problems or issues and it just doesn't really work. It's like they decided to give up on her and just force her into this role as the mother figure to all the women of AMC (Dixie, Krystal, Angie, Amanda, Kathy, etc.) I think in theory she could have worked as more as a fascinating character but she also is older as well so there is that to consider too. It feels like she was just written into this corner because she just had to be there regardless as to the why's and the road that led her there.

I agree with this. It certainly made more sense that Babe latched onto people who made her feel more valued then she probably felt she was at home if Krystal was a neglectful mother who had abandoned her. It actually makes her sleeping with Jaime the first night she met him more plausible because she had mommy issues where her mother abandoned her/was ignoring her. It also would have made her marriages to Paul and JR make more sense to. She would be jumping at any person who gave her the time of day and who promised to love her forever, which she never got. But they threw that out and she just became a character with poor impulse control and a monstrous lack of responsibility and a non-existent case of right and wrong.

Yeah they pretty much white washed all of Krystal's backstory and shaped her into a lioness mother who loved her daughter fiercely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

They whitewash everybody. The erase the "character" from all the characters til you have this beige slop of a boring show. I miss the nutjobs, kooks, psychos, nerds, chubbies, and misfits on soaps. The old Character Actors. Half the cast that made AMC so great would NEVER be hired in this day and age.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Eric I hope you keep making your points even if someone else did. We all say the same stuff over and over anyway. I'm glad you enjoy Lorraine's work...it's a good balance for someone like me who is more skeptical. I think the Orpheus idea had a lot of potential, under different circumstances.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Thanks Carl! I definitely don't want to give the impression that I don't recognize her flaws. And I agree with you that the story would have much more potential (even if it is a bit too sci fi for my usual taste) under other circumstances.

I know we always wonder on here how much Agnes is involved, but it sounds like for these final months she IS actively involved, in *some* capacity. I'd love to know what she thinks of it. (and as much as I worship at the altar of St Aggie, I freely admit she's not completely immune to these kinds of stories--or Broderick's supervillain scenarios--herself, maybe it was even her idea... lol )

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The real problem with AMC now is that it is so dense and yet so vacuous. There is a ton of character baggage but this baggage just seems to manifest in the same stories again and again and again with JR or Kendall. It just seems to swallow writers alive. That's why I am looking forward to what AMC can be with a new life.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yep, and this isn't something I would blame on the writers--even Pratt. It really is one of the major things that has killed soaps I think. I have a friend who just got into the ABC soaps, from me, back in Feb--and I think he gets sick of me always going on about how much better they used to be, but even he has said on numerous times (and I actually feel he's a bit too blind in his love of the shows, even without the history longterm viewers have) that too many of the people look the same, etc, etc. Soap characters used to have interesting professions too--even if we still didn't see them at their professions as much, they weren't all random businessmen/women or cops or lawyers or doctors--you had musicians, etc. And the Agnes Nixon soaps, particularly AMC, really did thrive on the over the top character roles (which it seems the established soap press in the 70s resented her for--but I think that's why some call her style Dickensian as he also wrote with a mixture of bland but rootable young lovers, almost over the top demonic villains, older maternal/paternal figures, and near-caricature comic and villainous characters, which I think could describe AMC perfectly circa 1980)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Right. I do think Broderick has helped in small amounts--making Jake/Amanda actually rootable for instance, going a long way to make Tad likeable (though this David hate again isn't helping), etc. But it does need a complete canvas overhaul. I only closely watch AMC and OLTL right now and it's funny, AMC always feels like it has way too small a cast to me--which ahs been a problem for a long time (which is why, even when they have nothing to do, I welcome the occasional scene with, say, Scott and Madison). On the other hand OLTL seems to have way too big a cast, with characters who feel useless popping up with useless storylines.

Speaking of, why wasn't Opal at that odd women's party today? Just a few well placed comic lines from her would have made the show that much better--it's details like that, that really make soaps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy