Jump to content

Y&R: Old Articles


DRW50

Recommended Posts

  • Members

You mean this lol? 
 

Y&R Casting New Role

A casting call has gone out for a new denizen of Genoa City, and it's described as a "fun, breakout role." The working name of the character is "Simone" and here are the details: She should be an ample-figured African-American female in her mid-30s. She will be sharp, sassy and bold, street-smart and unafraid of confrontation. She wears her emotions on her sleeve and does not suffer fools gladly. She dresses like she is going to a ball. She loves herself and knows she is "all that." The role is contract and will start around late-April.
 

 

I saved it from last year’s BLM discussions. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 14.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

LOL....Yikes  

Please register in order to view this content

 It's so crazy how that was almost 12 years ago now!....I think I had just joined SON around that time....So many fun comments to look back on though from 2010-2012.... It's a shame Deeedee decided to stop posting because they were hysterical with some of their quotes ("TO THE LAKE!!") Her inside knowledge of BTS Y&R stuff was quite insightful too. 

Another thing I almost forgot about was Jeanne Cooper had apparently actually voiced her displeasure to MAB for the writing for Katherine circa 2010/2011. I think she actually told her that if she wanted "Someone else to  sit and wear a blonde wig and serve pudding" she better find someone else, because she wouldn't have any of that!    I guess she wasn't happy with Katherine all of a sudden being the "saint" who offered advice to everyone.  I guess Jeanne regretting saying that though, because she did an interview backtracking what she said. Given we almost lost Eric Braeden, and MTS and Jess Walton were absent for months all under Maria, I guess she feared for her job. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think most of the Black male characters on Y&R in the past 15 years had potential, no? Including the character played by Lamon Archey, who they refused to write for. 

But let's take Nate, a character born on screen and compare him to Nicholas Newman, another character born on screen. Compare the first year each adult character was on the canvas. Lord knows JM was no Olivier (neither Laurence nor Martinez) when he first arrived but they gave him story, surrounded him with highly competent and talented actors (Heather Tom and all the experienced adult actors) and oh, Nick was involved in plenty of story (his own and others).

What did grown Nate get? 

Even compare Devon's transition from teen to adult to Nick's. Nick had a heavy duty relationship, an affair with Grace Turner. Entree into the business world, working for the family business. What did Devon get? A barely visible girlfriend? Languishing until they pair him in a triangle with his adopted father...and his de facto Aunt?

One character was written into viability...the others...not so much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yes, and go another step -- look at how they handled David Tom's Billy Abbott a few years later, and they were still pumping stories at his less those less-than-charismatic replacements that came between David Tom and Billy Miller.  They were just determined to make Billy a central character.  Nate -- nothing at all.  Devon -- very little after that initial storyline of foster care (which I believe was actually proposed to the writers by Victoria Rowell).  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

To compare Nick's intro in 95(?) under Bell to Devon is a little unfair in that as we know Bell's approach has never been duplicated under successive regimes.

Look at Reed and Noah - the next generation of Newman males -aged up and given very little to do. Reed has disappeared and Noah is on what,his 3rd recast? He's still an ill defined character.

Same with Kyle-he came and went until Michael Mealor, and you could still argue that the character wasn't ever consistent.

Scott, Fen, Charlie , Mattie -the list goes on.

Devon was merely the first in along line of partially ignored and poorly written characters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I apologize for not remembering who said it but someone had an insight on here a few months ago that I have thought about a lot and ended up thinking was key: the strength of YR and the reason for its stability in the ratings is that it is veteran-heavy, much more than any other show in numbers and in fewer comings and goings.
The problem though is that that crowds out any new character and there is very little room to play new generations and invest in storylines outside of the narrow confine of those veterans.
It is a short-sighted strategy because none of them are getting any younger and once they start dropping, the void will be pretty terrible and the ratings will crash IMO if nothing is done to prepare the succession.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The stability of the cast is a double edged sword.

It's great to see familiar faces and have that comforting connection.

The downside is that years of marriages, kidnappings, brushes with death etc its hard to maintain interest as those characters are caught in repetitive cycles.

Victoria blathering on how Ashland is the love of her life, she's never been happier and her wedding day is her best ever loses its luster when she said the same thing on 5 or so previous occasions.

Edited by Paul Raven
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I was the one who mentioned that and I still stand by it - retaining so many veterans is its saving grace.

I don't think having a lot of veterans crowds out new characters. The issue with that is the writing and often casting just isn't there. You cannot possibly invest in the new characters when they have no interest or actual audience pull whatsoever. That's what needs to be fixed. In a better written show, weaving in the old with the new would be no issue and in the late 90s/early 2000s, the show definitely did that very, very successfully. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

My mom, when she was alive,  said that the show needed some strong younger characters to offset the veterans.  She said too many restless characters, not enough young characters.

However, she said her only nit pick was that the new characters needed to be played by people that could act.  And she said most of the younger characters were played by unmemorable performers (she loved Hilary though).

In regards to the best years of Y & R...I would say 1991 to spring 1992.

During that period, there were 3 strong stories going on at different speeds so the viewer was never bored:

David Kimball story 

Nikki's alcoholism

Sheila/Lauren 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • What's with this show constantly encouraging women to take back men who aren't worth a damn, then end up doing it lol. This was realistically a 4-episode week considering all the flashbacks to the showstopper can collectively form a 19-minute episode on its own.  
    • Another episode uploaded. Love Chandler introduction.

      Please register in order to view this content

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Naomi was in Monday's episode, though the client wasn't. Naomi and Jacob were at Uptown with Chelsea, Allison, Derek, and Ashley. And what an amazing episode that was today. Tricia Mann-Grant was absolute perfection as was Ambyr Michelle. I cannot wait to see Dana mix it up with the Duprees, especially Anita. 
    • This is me *pea green with envy* *sigh* The Reva vortex was like an F5 tornado. Widespread mayhem and damage.
    •  Yeah, I guess what easily comes to mind are guests who have taken advantage of a situation to reveal a secret (e.g. the mistress stopping a wedding to say that they're pregnant), or a host who planned an event to reveal things (like John Dixon's plan to humiliate Lisa at their engagement party on ATWT). But, that's a whole other level, where you can manipulate someone to throw a party in order to ruin it.
    • Not the community penis. Providing his service pro bono...I can't with his thirsty a**. Any chance that the OG Ted can come back as his brother back from the dead who died in the plane crash. It would give Andre family, too. 
    • Now that Leslie has had her fun what is she hoping for now? If I were Ted I'd be on the prowl for a hitman. Take her OUT! The new Ted, known for playing vile characters, just might do that.
    • To be clear, I know there have been a gazillion reveals at events on soaps. But these are usually events that would happen anyhow, like a city commemoration or a long-planned wedding. My *specific* question:  Has a character ever orchestrated an event to occur, for a seemingly benevolent reason, but actually for the sole purpose of spilling a reveal at the party, to the surprise of the event planners/hosts. Specifically: an event that the event hosts wouldn't have thought of making happen, and the hosts planned this event -- only due to the seemingly-innocent urging of the outside instigator who is secretly planning the reveal. This is NOT about an event that would have happened anyways. My reason for asking:  April/May 2025, on BeyondTheGates, a couple was NOT planning a wedding anniversary party.  But there was a plot by an instigator to convince the couple to have the party, and the motivation for this was so that the instigator could do a big reveal. The party wouldn't have happened if the instigator hadn't suggested it. I'm wondering if this has ever happened before on a soap, that a big event came into existence due to the plotting of the revealers.
    • Yes Emma!! Who is that?

      Please register in order to view this content

    • That photo is Andre is being respectfully kind to his cousin Eva, after the reveal.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy