Jump to content

DAYS: Behind the Scenes, Articles/Photos


Recommended Posts

  • Members

It also seemed to come from out of nowhere, since I don't recall John having had much to do with Lawrence or Vivian up to that point.  For me, it was an odd and disjointed way to blend two storyline bubbles into one.

By the way, I won't argue with you that making John and Roman twin brothers was the cleanest and easiest way out of the mess.  Again, though, it seemed like TPTB wanted to avoid what was sensible and simply shock the audience into tuning in, which set a bad precedent, IMO, for what was to come.

Here's a thought: what if TPTB had kept Dee's return under wraps and instead had brought Wayne back first?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 6.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

I don't recall John having much to do with Lawrence either, but I remember Lawrence creeping on Carrie and John was involved in that.  I can't remember if this was before or after John became an Alamain though.

Very interesting idea about Roman coming back first.  That might have worked better?  I could imagine John trying to fight for custody of the kids with Isabella and trying to keep his job while proving he was the 'real' Roman.  I felt a lot of those beats were dropped because Marlena was involved and John wouldn't do that to her.  Then Marlena comes back to 2 husbands lol.  Unfortunately I don't know how it would change the outcome.   I don't see any scenario where Marlena would not go back to Roman under any circumstance unless they made Marlena pregnant by John instead of Isabella.  I guess the show could have went in the direction of looking into Marlena's disappearance and finding out her and RoJohn had a kid or something.  In theory the whole Roman/John/Marlena story could be reversed with John/Marlena staying together and her having an affair with Roman instead or John having an affair with Isabella

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well, IDK whether the story would have worked any better - Gene Palumbo was just not the writer for a story like "A Tale of Two Romans" - but if the idea is that Drake's Roman is not the real Roman and that Wayne's Roman is still alive, then that's what you lead with first.  Then, at a certain point in the story, you lower the other boom: Marlena is alive, too!

God bless Dee, but I think she put DAYS in a very awkward spot by insisting that Wayne return as well.  Either she could have returned without Wayne, or the show could have taken its' chances and replace Drake with the man he had earlier replaced, but trying to satisfy Dee and hold onto Drake at the same time was always going to be a challenge, no matter how good the story.

Edited by Khan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yeah, and kind of a huge FU to Drake?  Like "Thanks for doing a nearly impossible job by taking on a recast of one of our most popular characters, having great chemistry with everyone including Deidre Hall, being super popular yourself, and an overall likable guy, but we are gonna replace you now lol  It will all work out fine....."  If I was Drake I'd probably still be bitter at Dee.  I assume Dee thought it sounded great on paper and was trying to help her good buddy out, but it was NOT a good idea.  I am not going to speculate on what Dee/Drake's relationship was like back then or early on, but it's such a weird demand.  It's almost like she wanted to dictate her own story and screen partners.

There were definitely more psychological beats they could have played with John vs. Roman.  John raised those children longer than Roman or Marlena, John got the promotion, John probably paid more mortgage payments on that home, he was there through Kayla, Bo, Kim's struggles etc. etc. etc.  He wasn't pretending to be Roman-he was actively living a full, productive life as Roman.  And that whole angle was dropped.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Cheers!

This has actually made me realise that I mixed up a bit of Rachel Blake's story with Princess Gina's story in my earlier post.

So to clarify: The 1996 explanation was that Stefano had brainwashed John because Rachel had told him about the Blakes, 1999 was that Stefano had gotten to Forrest very early and turned him into his Pawn and Forrest/John was never a priest.

 

Please register in order to view this content

 

It was literally during. John found Carrie and Lawrence in bed together about to do the deed and in the ensuing confrontation John pulled a gun on Lawrence and Lawrence was like "You wouldn't kill your own brother!"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I actually think he might have wound up on primetime.  I could easily see him as a dopey husband on some sitcom or some lead in a MacGyver like show.  He just seems like someone who would have a mildly successful show and work on primetime in unmemorable roles for years.  That's not even a diss.  I just think he would have moved on to other things pretty easily even though he's not a great actor.

That's sounds like a pivotal scene lol.  To be fair, when I start watching 1992 my eyes immediately glaze over because the stories are awful.  And I mean, it was TM's Carrie.  I don't think her actions even count lol.  I still don't know what the show was going for there.  I think it might be the initial prototype for Sami when they cast her as Carrie.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I believe he got cast as Shelley Long's husband in some CW series, but couldn't do it because of Days.  I think he has some sort of development deal with a network after he did 7 brides for 7 brothers.  He's one of those actors who is charismatic enough to maybe pull off a big career or not get recognized at all lol.  He fell into a happy medium with Days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This reminds me that Vivian had only been on canvas for about two months at the time of the Forest Alamain reveal. Later in 1992, we'd get the Nicky is Carly & Lawrence's son stuff, but I wonder if they were danging some red herrings about John/Forrest being Vivian's son?

Oh, good choice! And there was a prominent new male role available in 1991, Dimitri. Or was the character established before the Tale of Two Romans got started? Ah, either way, Drake would have done fine on AMC

Oh, Miller-Boyett would have loved Drake. I also have to laugh at you mentioning MacGyver, since Drake and Richard Dean Anderson played kin on 1982's Seven Brides for Seven Brothers.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Idek, but it's true lol.  

You get it Dee!!  MacGyver is a score especially back then.

Also what the hell is that intro to Seven Brides?  That looks so chintzy even for 1982 standards lol..

Please register in order to view this content

Drake doesn't really bring European count vibes the way Michael Nadar does, but I am sure a role could have been tailored to him.  He would have been great with Susan.  He has a good history of doing well with soap divas lol.

Edited by carolineg
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

They are an attractive couple.   I am hesitant to ask if Seven brothers was still a musical lol......

Dee also dated Quinn Redecker for awhile and well he's a silver fox I guess.  Her taste varied (waiting for the lesbian/Jane Elliot jokes).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy