Jump to content

AMC: Daniel Cosgrove Retruns


Recommended Posts

  • Members

DC in the story gives it a bit more validity. As I said before, he has more of a leading man presence than AM did. I do like Scott and Annie but they seemed doomed to fail; more like a roadblock. I think they could have potential to be a power couple now, depending on if the two actors have chemistry

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 91
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

This.

I liked Mayfield. He started to work for me when they paired him with MCE. IMO, he did a good job showing me how Scott truly loves Annie. I didn't buy Scott as some corporate titan in the making but that's because of the writing. I don't see JR that way either and as long as they keep running Chandler Enterprises out of their living room, I never will.

I thought Cosgrove was on the short list to be the next Joey Buchanan.

Yup. Just like cloning, all this intra-breeding has rendered the genre terminal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't get all of this "Adam Mayfield's dull and boring" stuff, it ain't like DC is popping off the screen Mr. Charisma von Showmanship. DC will suffer the same dull and boring streak as AM's Scott unless they do their work in the writers room. It seems very obvious to me that it was always the writing that was handicapping AM's Scott, he played what was on the page and I actually picked up on the actor's desire to go further with the role. They didn't allow him to truly school J.R. like they could have, to really make him a threat b/c the writing is in J.R.'s favor. I dunno, maybe that'll change, but taking a character in a new direction does NOT necessarily require a new actor, and I don't believe it did in this case.

Love her or hate her, you've lost the character of Marissa if you recast her too far from current type. She needs to stay on her side of the court, she doesn't need to be recast in Greenlee/Kendall/Amanda/Annie territory.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

But does Scott have to be a "hunk"? I don't think so, I mean, I know this is a soap and everything. Shane McDermott's Scott was certainly not a hunk (which was kind of surprising to me as he played a "heartthrob" opposite SMG on Swans Crossing). But if they're looking for a Scott that'll *pop* they should have gone with frenetic energy Forbes (which I would have :rolleyes: to as well, for the record).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I look forward to JR finally having a worthy opponent and AM as Scott wasn't it.

I personally think this casting is about moving the character of Scott away from the quad and more towrds the Greenlee's and Kendalls where the character of Scott should be in the first place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Add me to the group of people who think that Brandon has improved. He has. There's no doubt about it. Especially compared to the beginning. And he's improving in a way that... it makes me think that he realizes what the issues are and is addressing them. Of course, he's no master of acting at this point... but I don't cringe as much as I did. And I've seen people in Bold... I won't even have to name names, because everyone knows who they are... who are becoming even worse than what they were offering in the first place. So... I'm happy that in BTG... people are actually blossoming and improving. It surely means that the atmosphere is creative and nurturing talent.  BUT and it's a big butt... his relationship with his husband is still so lacking and ghastly. I am craving to see more action from these guys. I want to see Smitty's character. If he has any. 
    • Thank you. You guys come to the rescue again. I'll take a look later.   Thank you for the info!!! Now I find myself less confused. You and @DRW50 are amazing.
    • I know Passions used this trope with Ethan and Sam to drag out the paternity, but GH seems to speed through certain stories while dragging others.
    • For any other soap, I think I’d agree, but GH, I don’t know

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Agreed, that there was some strange choices in the episode, especially at the end, but overall, that was some great drama that opens up the potential for so much future storyline. Kat vs. Eva having the most potential, especially over Tomas. I have mixed feelings about Martin/BC though. I thought he did pretty well in scenes with Smitty/MM, but the scenes of him confronting Leslie and of him throwing the books were bad lol she acted circles around him.  It’s similar to what Harding Lemay said about George Reinholt at AW; he could be brilliant in one scene, but then mediocre in the next. 
    • I know some of y'all really like Brooke Kerr, and so I've tried to give her a shot, despite her frequent flat line readings and distracted "did I leave the front door unlocked?" facial expressions. But lord, she is so bad at playing a tough-talking badass that I was actually rooting for Brad today to spill the beans to Drew. 
    • Googling does tend to ruin it.  For those of us who were teens in the late 1970s and early 1980s, you can't imagine how much fun it was to watch the show in the afternoons.  (It came on right after school.)  There weren't any "spoilers" at the time.  We would always try to anticipate how each crime and each mystery would be resolved, and we were ALWAYS wrong, because the stories are filled with so many weird twists and turns.   The head writer (Henry Slesar) and his dialogue writer (Steve Lehrman) invariably toss genuine clues directly into your face in the most unlikely ways, but then they provide a host of "red herrings" to completely confuse you and send you off on the wrong path.  Once the story reaches its conclusion, all you can think is Why didn't I figure that out weeks ago?  lol
    • Does the vault have the original scene and not the short flashback?
    • I appreciate that you are using AI with the knowledge of it's limitations. Some posters take everything it produces as fact.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy