Jump to content

Dallas 2.0: Discussion Thread


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 2.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

For me, it's an issue, because Gary always has been the one who cared most about Southfork, not J.R. or even Bobby. That's why J.R. always considered Gary "weak," because while he was off wildcatting with Jock and his cronies, Gary was happier being under his mama on old man Southworth's land.

Also, this is DALLAS, not FALCON CREST. They really need to save the whole "The land, always the land" jive for the Channings and Giobertis.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think it would be very wise for all you guys to do the weekly Dallas survey after each episode. You can give your opinion on everything from character to the story and they ask interesting questions. If TNT is seriously paying to the fans comments it could really go a long way.

Here's the link: https://www.tvinnerc...10&fromdetect=1

An example:

1zewgfp.png

1zywphu.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You are so pessimistic. Why do you think Mad Men can afford bad ratings but Dallas can't? They're both basic cable. Dallas's ratings are not bad by any barometer. It was the #1 cable show last week, and it was the #1 cable show last night. I believe last week it was just flat out the #1 show in its timeslot cable or broadcast. TNT is not going to cancel this so fast nor should they.

What cable shows with this level of promotion have had higher? Leave HBO shows out of it, we are talking basic cable. I think Mad Men's audience is approximately half what Dallas' is and I bet their budget is higher being a period piece.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Please register in order to view this content

      Leslie to Kat: "The only branch that I want is the one that goes across your behind for your insolence" LOL...if Leslie was her stepmother, she'd have whooped her disobedient azz
    • I really love Chelsea's eyerolls.  At Dani last week, and at Hayley today.
    • I thought that was hilarious too! This was at the point they started to mellow out Lisa....I wonder if Fulton fought this or if she liked that her character could change. It seems now Joyce is getting all of Lisa's trouble making stories, and now Natalie has become the vixen slutting around town. I would love to see some Natalie videos.
    • Credits for Monday, June 9, 2025: Created by: Frank & Doris Hursley Executive producer: Frank Valentini Head writers: Chris Van Etten, Elizabeth Korte Writers: Micah Steinberg, Kate Hall, Cathy Lepard Director: Denise Van Cleave
    • Please register in order to view this content

      Yes, Nicole. DRAG HER!
    • Writers: Teresa Zimmerman Lynn Martin Director: Steven Williford
    •  Yeah, he is still dressed like Martin. He looks great, though.  Cute picture. Sober up, cause we need the tea.
    • Well, Claire did rig Rick's test results, but it was to flunk. They actually managed to get his correct results back after they were thrown into Cedar's furnace...I think? Everyone knew Claire changed them and Rick passed so that rewrite never made sense.   I agree. Pratt always seems "edgy" on screen (and her Locker Room interview prooved that it came from her personality.) I liked Claire causeing trouble and love Meta ringing her beads. Its just too bad that Abby left and they kinda just forgot Claire existed. 
    • Oh so they did sleep together. The retcon was just the medical boards? That makes sense. I think Susan Pratt, while a good actress, was just an unlikeable presence onscreen and soaps wrote to that most of the time. There was some potential for more with her when she returned in that stint, as Pratt was at least interesting to watch and caused some conflict for the stifled Bauers. Instead of pairing her with Alan and then disappearing I might have had her hook up with Danny. I think there was a lot of flirtation with Bolger's Philip, but they never crossed the line.
    • I haven't seen Melchior in the role, but it would be astounding if she's worse than Linn. Her rivalry with Stephanie was sidelined IMO because Linn was one of the few actors who didn't have chemistry with, nor raise her game, when paired with Susan Flannery. To be fair, she did show some signs of life in scenes opposite Darlene Connelly, but way too little too late. It feels like Bell finally woke up after the Thorne switchover and sidelined the Kristin character with Mick to 1 or 2 appearances a week. As a result, the show improved by leaps and bounds after she was inexplicably at the center of the show for most of 1989. Margo is so much more enjoyable when not tied to that albatross. Even Clarke is watchable with less Kristin interaction. She can't exit stage left soon enough. As for the new Thorne, I agree that Norcross feels like a Forrester a lot more than Thrachta, even if the latter is a better actor.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy