Jump to content

B&B: January Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Members

I didn't think anyone watched or discussed B&B anymore. After watching the last two eps I wondered why I even bothered too. Steffy is brain-dead and I don't care about her. The only thing that could make me watch this show again is if Sheila was to be coming on board or Ridge was violently killed off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 123
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Well...there are days I wonder why I bother. I did have to laugh at Hope's GREAT line "I wonder if having a psychiatrist for a mother makes her feel like she's always right" or something like that. Because, not only does it illuminate Taylor's superior attitude, it fits both Thomas and Steffy to a tee.

And as much as I dislike Bill...I was almost hoping Steffy and Thomas would plot some stupidity, just to see Bill swat them like the flies they are.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

More like 95%! Bill & Katie is the only one I like. Jackie & Owen started off OK but then it turned into the Sexy-Photoshoot Montage. They have no relationship, they just like posing half-naked in front of a camera.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Sarah Brown always looks on the verge of laughter in her emotional scenes. I do like her and Nick together, but they can't be romantic for obvious reasons. I can't believe I've forgiven Nick or Katie for what they did. This would just be asking me too much. Scary thing is that they aren't even attempting to chemistry test her with somebody else so it's likely she'll be paired with him.

Overall I'm not loving B&B, but I find it very watchable. I do like the Agnes story and overall happenings at Spectra. I like the Bill/Katie drama although it could be so much better with better writing and more favorable writing for the Forresters. I HATE Hope. She's from the Steffy brand of acting. Just terrible and not pretty enough. Looks like Donna's daughter. In general the show would be improved by focusing more on the Forrester's. Bring back some extended family members, feature Felicia and Thorne. Integrate them. Even Eric and Stephanie seem like after thoughts at this point. That's a big problem since they're the first family of B&B and have been the main, limited focus for such a long time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Does anyone know what role Bell wants Kim Zimmer to play? Know one will ever match Darlene Connely (sp?), but I think she'd make for a great Sally recast. I think enough time has gone by and recasts happen all the time on soaps. I felt like Spectra v Forrester was the only format that has ever worked for this show. Forrester against Spencer and Jackie M. just doesn't work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • What AW stories do you think of as DOOLish? I mean AW, in a very positive way was KNOWN for its comedic elements. From Iris's maid, Vivian, to the naming of plants, to highjinks with Cass, Felicia, Wally & even Lily, plus remember Dee Evans & Tony the Tuna? In a way at one time DAYS had similar with Caliope & Eugene. 
    • Were those reasons to do with having younger children on set? Other shows seem to manage. The ageing up of the kids has been one of the mistakes the show has made.
    • I agree.  Lemay was supposed to start in early 88 and we saw some of the writing on the wall with character reference from the past.  Notably, the core families Frames, Cory, Matthews.  The stupid Reginald Love was wrapped up.  Not even a year later Mary was written out of the show along with Vince and the McKinnons who came and left .  The previous writers tried to introduce a new family that never aspired with the viewers.  1988 was focused on the 25th anniversary of show in 1989 and suspect why Lemay was asked to come back in 88.  Prior to 1988, the storylines were so DOOL stupid.
    • That's true. He may have ended up keeping her on a recurring basis, like Dr. Michaels on ATWT. I'm trying to remember if GL had a similar long-running therapist.
    • Oh in terms of ratings I think it would have been in a dicey place probably even before then. I mostly was just thinking of if the show could have carried on creatively. 
    • Even if by some miracle Knots Landing continued, 1994/95 it would have been killed by ER.
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Assuming that Marland had been allowed to write the Carrie story the way he'd envisioned, Millette would've been involved in the story. And she might've played a role in Andy Norris' return (if the speculation on that had ever materialized, and Marland loved bringing back bad boys) But he doesn't seem interested in Sara's personal life. And the women of Springfield could only be analyzed so much.
    • This better be something, because as I said, so far it's just cliches and stereotypes -- the story we've heard a thousand times about the homeless person who doesn't want a home and prefers to live on the streets.
    • @rsclassicfanforever thank you very much for the recent uploads of season 13 containing some episodes that were skipped or glitchy on YouTube!  I had a look at 3172 though and there is no audio for most of it? Would you have a copy with complete audio? Fingers crossed! Thanks again! 

      Please register in order to view this content

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy