Jump to content

AMC: Pratt Is History...


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 270
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Well this is certainly reassuring news for AMC fans- they're getting a respectable head writer who's previous tenure(s) were well-received. I can't remember the last time AMC announced a head writing change that actually got me excited.

I totally disagree. I didn't like his tenure at all and HATED the way he wrote Marcy Walker's Liza.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I liked Culliton's stuff at first, but then it just became one big confusing mess with the whole convoluted Proteus thing devouring the entire show. To this day, I have no idea what that storyline was about. Something about drug trafficking and Vanessa's split personality! Totally clueless LOL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yeah I NEVER could untangle Proteus--to me it was an example of an umbrella storyline taking over everything. I think many of the problems during his run weren't his fault--just a feeling--but his tenure, for as much as I enjoyed it, was riddled with dropped characters (Timmy being the most obvious) and storylines. I also am not sure he quite got the Pine Vally vibe to me (again by no means do I suggest the writers since have gotten it any better, except maybe the first few months of McT's return when she briefly really focused on family again) Not sure why i feel that way but... It honestly felt more like Another World or something to me

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Supposedly Culliton had a plan to revitalize the show, which included keeping vets front and center. From what I remember reading, he had major story in the works for Palmer, Opal, and Brooke. But that was the last thing that Frons, who had just succeeded Angela Shapiro, wanted to hear. He dumped Culliton and hired Rayfield, who tried to turn the show into a daytime version of "Sex and the City."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I wasn't overly bothered because at least she wasn't stuck being the somewhat dry heroine. Liza had been drifting as a character for years. She shouldn't have been stuck as a prop to Mia but I thought it had some interesting moments.

As for dropped stories like Timmy, I thought that was more due to Culliton being fired than due to his own plans.

I did think the Proteus story was a mess, although I thought Vanessa's split personality and Trey as her son was good, if very flawed (I hated that they dumped him with the writer change). Otherwise I enjoyed more of his tenure than I didn't, and he was the last writer to give Brooke a storyline, he wrote for Anna/David, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Ha!

Same here.

Wasn't there something about diamonds, too?

I don't think they ever revealed who 'Proteus' really was. It was Vanessa, I guess, but then didn't they hint later on that it was someone else? It was either Vanessa only thinking she was 'Proteus' because of her insanity, or something like her faking the "Rosie Wells" persona to get off her crimes..??? UGH! Nevermind.... I'm getting a headache.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I thought Culliton's tenure was largely excellent. I loved it, and Agnes was involved and wanted to keep Vanessa around; she was reportedly livid when Frons came to ABC and insisted Dusay had to go.

There were rough patches. Case in point the introduction of Simone, who unwisely debuted as a 'slinky femme fatale,' dark and mysterious. Who gave a [!@#$%^&*]? Then they made her comic relief, and she worked in that role, but they could've done more with her. I loved her in that whole thing with Roger Smythe, but then they kept shuffling her off on all the rejected male leads, including (and this indicates the problems at AMC, for him to be a 'reject') James Scott.

I despised Rayfield and Cascio. It was such a plastic, corporate program, not horribly offensive like Pratt, but incredibly soulless and boring. Dozens of new characters, it seems, and I didn't care about any of them. And despite the Lianca fans' boasts, that Cambias/Lena "corporate" storyline was just terrible, written by sixth graders. There was nothing "complex" or "intelligent" about that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

         
    • @TaoboiI ran into Dani’s favorite party planner again tonight

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I think they’re desperately trying to cover his awful tattoos. But anyway them being unable to style short kings properly has been a major pet peeve of mine for a while now.  I honestly don’t understand what some people expect from actors to even begin considering them for recognition. Let’s be real—awards mostly mean that an actor is respected by their peers and has some level of cultural relevance. Actual judgment on the acting itself? That’s often secondary—highly subjective and shaped by the times. I completely agree on both points. If you’re an actor or a dancer you shouldn’t get any tattoos (sorry not sorry). Tomas’ tattoos are ugly too. And regarding the couples- you’re completely right. These writers are unable to write romance.   Further comments: - Kat cannot be this dumb to keep tampering with evidence over and over again. And I’m officially not a fan of the actress—every time she’s in a scene with Leslie, she doesn’t seem intimidated at all. She plays it like comic relief, which is just too much, especially when paired with Leslie’s histrionics and over-the-top antics. Leslie is older, dangerous, and has literally been portrayed as homicidal—Kat should be at least a little scared. • I also didn’t like Kat playing damsel in distress with the hotel manager. It gave off the same weird energy as Dani with the cop. I would’ve much preferred the version Paul Raven suggested, with her sneaking in through housekeeping. • And yes, Dani again accused Hayley of faking the pregnancy—this time even specifying she might be using a pillow under her shirt. (No fake miscarriage being mentioned) I stand by my take: this is ridiculous writing. No one in the real world—except us, the chronically online soap watchers—would even think of such a conspiracy theory. Haley is no Beyoncé. • What in the world was Chelsea wearing in her hair the other day? And this whole thing with Madison is beyond cringe. Chelsea’s coming off as needy and toxic—basically like every other Dupree. • I’m glad the casino storyline is moving forward, but it’s still boring as hell. Honestly, I’d be so here for a plot twist where Vanessa and Doug take Joey out. • The direction and editing lately have been rough. Abrupt cuts, weird pacing… something just feels off overall. There’s a strange uneasiness to how it’s all coming together. • And finally: Tomas is too much of a saint. Where are the messy sluts when you need them? (Vanessa doesn’t count.)
    • I was watching some August 1987 episodes and they brought back so many memories. I had some thoughts: Lisa and Jamie were so dull. Lisa was such a nothing character. It boggles my mind that so much story was centered around her in such a short amount of time. Joanna Going is a talented actress, but the material was just not there.  It was so good to see Wallingford and Mitch again. I know there was talk about Felicia a while back, but these episodes reminded me how integral Felicia was for the show.  Sally Spencer was done so dirty. She is turning in superb performances in an icky storyline. I wish she had stuck around longer. She has chemistry with everyone. The McKinnons should have lasted longer. Spencer had some strong stuff with Stephen Schnetzer and Mary Alexander. AW waster such a talented actress by getting rid of her. Justice for Cheryl too. I also missed Ed Fry when he left. Sandra Ferguson was a star from the moment she came on. She was charismatic and just popped. She had immediate chemistry with RKK and blended in well with Wyndham and Watson. I'd forgotten about the teenage Matthew.  I have no memory of Peggy Lazarus. She must not have lasted long. Was the original plan for John that he was going to turn out to be the twins' real father?      
    • If the new and improved copies that @rsclassicfanforever has uploaded can be manually moved into the "by month, by year" folders, that would be awesome. I personally don't think it's necessary to keep the older versions (which either have Dutch subtitles hard coded on them, or are lesser in picture quality). That's a lot of valuable drive space that could be cleared. Just my view but can appreciate others may feel differently. The structure had been by month by year previously, so I think it would be easier to conform to that, where so much prior work to get it to that format has already been done. Hopefully you can "drag and drop" so the new copies are in the right month/year? Re Clips, I never look at them now we pretty much have the episodes in full. Appreciate others may use, however. Thanks for all your hard work here @BoldRestless!
    • Oh yes defintely, Josh Griffith repeats and repeats the same storylines.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy