Jump to content

AMC: Pratt Is History...


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 270
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Yeah, I want to be thrilled but I dread to think who Frons will hire next.

ICAM. 'The writer' destroyed our show and Pratt somewhat brought it back to life. It scares me to think Frons might reemploy her.

ITA, any combination of Broderick, Walsh, Beldner and Johnson would be a huge improvement over the writers Frons has hired over the years, but I don't think he'd consider any of them because they would want to write for the real Pine Valley, not Frons' version of it.

I'm trying to be optimistic, but I fear you're right!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

As much as many people hated Pratt's writings I enjoyed it. I am not saying I enjoyed every storyline because I didn't but at least Pratt kept me watching everyday. Pratt gave us more Erica and Adam then B&E ever did.

I am shocked that he is gone because he is one of Fron's pets. Weird.

Hopefully we can get a better HW.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I liked the way Pratt wrote Erica and the somewhat resurgence of the Hubbards, but other than, he can pack his [!@#$%^&*] and get out my house yesterday. I'm wearing my bulletproof (I was just visiting Port Charles, dontchaknow) and I'm prepared to get mauled on every side, but I would take the first year and a half of MMT's stint over Pratt's stint any day of the week. At least the show didn't feel like a crippled grandma limping along on her last legs then. AMC's main focuses, family and young love, were still the main theme. Pratt's AMC basically threw a hand grenade into everything the show was built on and left it in a state that can best be described as hollow.

PS: I am in no way defending anything post-babyswitch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

^I can't imagine what he could have done that was worse then what happened this week...well, maybe it's more that I don't want to.

I still haven't decided if it's a good thing or a bad thing that someone fired Pratt. I can't imagine that it was Frons, since they're BFF's but if it was someone above Froms...then what the hell did he write that would make someone above Frons step in?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Joe is shot in the head for the 40th anniversary. A grief stricken Ruth garrotes Petey with Opal's beads. Amanda has sex with Ruth to try to diffuse the situation.

Ryan, meanwhile, tells everyone Annie is to blame.

He then fires at her, and shoots Tad in the head.

Tad, with head wound, breaks into an old Rip Taylor routine and throws confetti for the anniversary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

There are bullet-proof destruction kits.

I know that. But, if this info is true, he obviously didn't follow what he was told to do. The clashed and lost. Do you understand? He wasn't following the orders 100%. So they'll find someone who will.

As someone said, Pratt must be expensive. Writing contract, producing contract, god knows what else...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I think they’re desperately trying to cover his awful tattoos. But anyway them being unable to style short kings properly has been a major pet peeve of mine for a while now.  I honestly don’t understand what some people expect from actors to even begin considering them for recognition. Let’s be real—awards mostly mean that an actor is respected by their peers and has some level of cultural relevance. Actual judgment on the acting itself? That’s often secondary—highly subjective and shaped by the times. I completely agree on both points. If you’re an actor or a dancer you shouldn’t get any tattoos (sorry not sorry). Tomas’ tattoos are ugly too. And regarding the couples- you’re completely right. These writers are unable to write romance.   Further comments: - Kat cannot be this dumb to keep tampering with evidence over and over again. And I’m officially not a fan of the actress—every time she’s in a scene with Leslie, she doesn’t seem intimidated at all. She plays it like comic relief, which is just too much, especially when paired with Leslie’s histrionics and over-the-top antics. Leslie is older, dangerous, and has literally been portrayed as homicidal—Kat should be at least a little scared. • I also didn’t like Kat playing damsel in distress with the hotel manager. It gave off the same weird energy as Dani with the cop. I would’ve much preferred the version Paul Raven suggested, with her sneaking in through housekeeping. • And yes, Dani again accused Hayley of faking the pregnancy—this time even specifying she might be using a pillow under her shirt. (No fake miscarriage being mentioned) I stand by my take: this is ridiculous writing. No one in the real world—except us, the chronically online soap watchers—would even think of such a conspiracy theory. Haley is no Beyoncé. • What in the world was Chelsea wearing in her hair the other day? And this whole thing with Madison is beyond cringe. Chelsea’s coming off as needy and toxic—basically like every other Dupree. • I’m glad the casino storyline is moving forward, but it’s still boring as hell. Honestly, I’d be so here for a plot twist where Vanessa and Doug take Joey out. • The direction and editing lately have been rough. Abrupt cuts, weird pacing… something just feels off overall. There’s a strange uneasiness to how it’s all coming together. • And finally: Tomas is too much of a saint. Where are the messy sluts when you need them? (Vanessa doesn’t count.)
    • Andrew sure has hard nips.
    • I was watching some August 1987 episodes and they brought back so many memories. I had some thoughts: Lisa and Jamie were so dull. Lisa was such a nothing character. It boggles my mind that so much story was centered around her in such a short amount of time. Joanna Going is a talented actress, but the material was just not there.  It was so good to see Wallingford and Mitch again. I know there was talk about Felicia a while back, but these episodes reminded me how integral Felicia was for the show.  Sally Spencer was done so dirty. She is turning in superb performances in an icky storyline. I wish she had stuck around longer. She has chemistry with everyone. The McKinnons should have lasted longer. Spencer had some strong stuff with Stephen Schnetzer and Mary Alexander. AW waster such a talented actress by getting rid of her. Justice for Cheryl too. I also missed Ed Fry when he left. Sandra Ferguson was a star from the moment she came on. She was charismatic and just popped. She had immediate chemistry with RKK and blended in well with Wyndham and Watson. I'd forgotten about the teenage Matthew.  I have no memory of Peggy Lazarus. She must not have lasted long. Was the original plan for John that he was going to turn out to be the twins' real father?      
    • If the new and improved copies that @rsclassicfanforever has uploaded can be manually moved into the "by month, by year" folders, that would be awesome. I personally don't think it's necessary to keep the older versions (which either have Dutch subtitles hard coded on them, or are lesser in picture quality). That's a lot of valuable drive space that could be cleared. Just my view but can appreciate others may feel differently. The structure had been by month by year previously, so I think it would be easier to conform to that, where so much prior work to get it to that format has already been done. Hopefully you can "drag and drop" so the new copies are in the right month/year? Re Clips, I never look at them now we pretty much have the episodes in full. Appreciate others may use, however. Thanks for all your hard work here @BoldRestless!
    • Oh yes defintely, Josh Griffith repeats and repeats the same storylines.
    • Isnt’t this storyline similar to the Cameron Kirsten situation though? Sharon thought she killed him. He ended up being alive and Sharon was being tormented with thinking she was seeing his face everywhere and that’s how we got that iconic scene with her and Nikki in the sewers.   I understand in Mariah’s case this is different circumstances but it does seem like a play on that whole thing. Maybe I’m wrong. I just wish if they were going to make any character follow in Sharon’s foot steps it would be Faith. Mariah wasn’t even raised by her, and her personality is different. I would expect her to take a different path. I understand I could be completely jumping ahead because the storyline hasn’t even played out yet but we’ll see. 
    • Thanks again @Paul Raven Monica was completely without redeeming qualities at this point. I always found the whole Monica = Carly narrative regressive, as I don't think shows comparing characters so heavily is ever a great idea, but she's actually worse than Carly was. Was it the Pollocks who had Leslie have a miscarriage?  Giving her a child, especially by rape, was not a good idea, but a part of me wishes they'd committed to it just to see what story it might have had in later years.
    • @janea4old Your detailed explanation and delving into the psychology and motivations is no doubt the opposite of what we will see onscreeen. As @ranger1rg stated we will get a few scenes and some sketchy explanations. Like the adoption of Aria, most of it will take place off screen.
    • I'm suddenly fearful that DAYS is going to pull a Flowers-for-Algernon stunt and Bo's progress will be reversed.  While @te. is stuck on Abe's tiny bedroom, I can't stop thinking of the size of Bo's huge hospital room.
    • Okay, why are Paulina and Abe sleeping like that?!  I'd take a screen grab if I wasn't lazy, but come on.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy