Jump to content

OLTL: Discussion for the week November 2


Recommended Posts

  • Members

OLTL has played "Devil's Advocate" for homophobes many times - with Clint, Michael McBain, even Daniel Colson. Neither Clint nor Michael were presented as evil people. So I don't see why it needed yet another round. OLTL has more than done its part in presenting both sides of the social controversy over homosexuality with its multiple gay stories in the last two decades. Again, I fail to see why it is obligated to once again portray the same old pro/anti debate it has done a thousand times, instead of doing what it did and striking new ground.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 190
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

This is a pretty simple expression of how I feel about the whole thing. It was done in a very black-and-white way, IMO, which probably does more harm than good. The main issue here is that the story has been SO rushed and one-sided. I'm sorry, and I may risk opening myself up to criticism here, but I think it is unfair to always portray the people who oppose us, as ILLOGICAL, IGNORANT, and WRONG they may be, as the stereotypical sign-carrying, Bible-quoting, F-word-spouting homophobic bigots similar to (but worse than) what OLTL gave us the last couple of days. Yes, those types of people DO exist, and yes, that's sometimes an accurate portrayal, but come on, not everyone who opposes gay marriage is like that, and I think that the story could have had a lot more heart if it was taken at a much slower and true-to-life pace. Yeah, many gay people are surrounded by friends and family who love them and are 100% for gay rights, and that's awesome, but unfortunately, that's not true for all of us, and it's also not true for some of us that everyone who *does* have a problem with homosexuality is 100% against us. I just feel that by rushing this story, they robbed it of something more.

And that's probably more of a commentary on the whole show than it is on just this story. EVERYTHING is rushed, and nothing ever happens organically anymore.

Whenever the issue of gay marriage comes up, there are always gonna be people who are for it and people who are against it, and how can a story be lauded as "realistic" and "accurate" when it only focuses on one side and displays the other side as Scooby-Doo villains. Nixon somehow found a way to focus on both sides while leaning to the more liberal side when she wrote Erica's abortion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

A bigot is a bigot is a bigot.

How AREN'T they?

The story is a referendum about denying minority groups their civil rights & other side's "arguments" are baseless & without merit.

...And the fight for women's reproductive rights continues 30 years later.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Right, it would be at least *interesting* to see a calm, rational (regardless of what our personal ideas of "rational" are) person who wasn't influenced by religion have a conversation where he or she was not in support of gay marriage, or homosexuality in general. We'd of course be free to disagree, a problem I have with these stories is all of the slant. We don't need that, we're not that dumb, no one has to tell us how to feel or who we should be siding with. If we're going to "rehash", let's at leasat toss in some hitherto unexplored elements, I don't mean turning a beloved character into a demon for s/l purposes, but say a character who (right or wrong) provided the opposing argument in an intellectual way opposed to a crazy emotional, religious one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I disagree. What if Kyle and Oliver were portrayed like Perez Hilton? It would be just as old and played-out.

It's more about their behavior and attitude. It's just like how a person can oppose gay rights while not believing that gay people go to hell. They're certainly not for homosexuality, but at the same time, they're not self-proclaimed homophobes who wallow and take pride in their bigotry and ignorance.

Baseless and without merit as they may be, those arguments still exist. If a character on the show expressed an opposing view with what they believed was appropriate back-up, but was then shot down with explanations of how every single piece of "evidence" they have is wrong, then THAT would have been a way to show both sides in a purely truthful and honest way.

True, but I don't understand how pretending like the other side of the issue doesn't exist gives one side the right to claim victory. Voters in Maine over-turned the state's allowance of gay marriages yesterday, and this is a quote about one of the leaders of the main anti-gay marriage group:

The ridiculous thing about that is that they essentially believe that if their children don't know about homosexuality, they'll never meet a gay person. That's not true, and thinking that if not acknowledging the presence of those who don't support us means we'll never have to cross paths with someone who is going to not be OK with homosexuality is the same thing.

Just to clarify, my problem with the storyline is not the actual thing itself. RC has established himself as a pretty over-the-top writer, so this is nothing when compared to the likes of Mendorra, 1968, etc. It's just that I don't get how this is supposed to be a "realistic" portrayal. I'll accept it as hope for what we want the world to be, but I'm not sold on it being what the world is today.

ALSO: I'm not saying that I want the show to show homophobic characters who are okay with their homophobia with gay characters who just bow down and accept it. What I want is for them to show a mildly homophobic person who can be easily swayed to the way of being accepting of homosexuality. I want to see a story where a person who denies being a homophobe but occasionally makes homophobic comments is shown how their words and actions aren't consistent with someone who claims to be accepting of gay people.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

As effeminate self obsessed media whores?

Could be fun. :lol:

So Gays are not good enough to be equal citizens but not bad enough to be given an automatic to hell is a viable ideology?

Really?

And to entertain said arguments is giving them validity which they don't deserve.

When Evangeline's character was attacked by racists there wasn't an uproar about treating racists with kid gloves so why should homophobes get a free pass?

Now THAT would have been an After School Special.

It is not pretending.

It's not caring.

Justifying bigotry need not be indulged or entertained.

On a show where Todd's harem fights to be his Bottom Bitch?

On a show where John McBain's scuzzy hair & doughy figure is sexy?

On a show where John Paul Lavoisier & Farah Fath's hair out acts them?

Mitch?

The presence of reality on OLTL is highly overestimated.

That is unrealistic.

Ignoring homophobia is not realistic but bigots being swayed by a Scissors Sisters cd isn't?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The problem is that most of the people who vocally oppose gay marriage generally are emotional and religious. Their arguments are based on, "The children will be perverted," "Europe/Scandanavia/Sweden are dying because of the gays," "Marriage is about reproduction," and so on. A lot of the time it's "Because I say so."

There aren't a lot of logical, calm, rational arguments against gay marriage. At least not from those who actively get involved in these things. That's why so much of this becomes, "Don't question my opinion, you're a bigot against my religion! You're persecuting my religion!!!" when anyone pushes back against this mindset.

I think the scheming and gameplaying from the main gay marriage proponents (Nick and Amelia) and Dorian's claiming to be gay for pure political reasons presented a picture of gay marriage which was not all sweetness and light.

I wish the story had been more balanced and much slower paced, as viewers had few reasons to invest in Kyle/Fish/Nick, together or individually, but since the story really wasn't about gay marriage itself, I'm not as bothered as a lot of people are.

I would rather the show be more realistic about rape and abuse against women, which sadly seems completely unlikely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

For the thousandth time - why does OLTL once again have to show the "opposing (bigoted) argument" in a gay storyline? They were doing that before any other soap did. They've done it a bunch of times. Why do it again and again? This was something different.

As to today. I loved Danielle and Matthew. Destiny has got to be recast. That kid can't compete with those two, they're too cute together. Tea is a bitch, what else is new. They just need to let the character own it, or at least the writers need to own it.

Greg and Rachel are still hot. Sean Ringgold has suddenly become a much better actor than he used to be. And Bo and Nora are still great.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrator

Didn't Clint oppose to something during the gay storyline in the mid 90's under Malone, and people hated Clint for that?

Same here but I also like Matthew/Destiny.

True. I wish she was a better actress to be on par with Eddie and Kelley Massal. BTW, I thought Kelley was pretty good in her first scenes with Flo and they look like daughter/mother too.

I think she's written like a bitch and I like it.

He brought it today when Shaun confonted Rachel/Greg.

I didn't like how we didn't get a continuation of yesterday's episode. I hate it soaps do this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

For all my hate of Carlivati's OLTL, I have much love for Sean Ringgold. His are some of the few OLTL clips I can watch without wanting to pluck out my eyes and dip them in bleach. I like watching a rough actor who doesn't fit the mold grow and develop. I think he has real talent and he seems to have at least one foot planted in the real world. I haven't seen the Rachel/Greg scenes, mainly because I have no interest in Rachel 4.0 or Greg. But it sounds like they're worth watching.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Kobe/Long had their own template and pretty much gutted the cast. As soon as contracts were up established characters were dropped. They needed to free the budget for the new characters. Going back to Ann,I wonder why the Dobsons renewed her contract around 78? After her initial story she became supporting and they didn't seem to want to pursue a romance with Mike. Maybe the feedback was that viewers blamed her indirectly for Leslie's death. If Mike hadn't taken on her case etc. Did she decide not to disrupt her son's life? Seems odd after everything she didn't claim him back. 1976 continues... Joe Werner is just not bouncing back after his recovery as he should, and Sarah, concerned about his sometimes morbid-seeming depression, consults Justin Marler. They agree that Joe is becoming a “cardiac cripple,” and know this kind of overcompensation for illness and overprecaution can not only be a permanently depressed condition but can actually cause a setback for him physically.  Marler releases Joe into Sarah’s care, but it’s soon apparent that just being out of the hospital hasn’t done anything to boost Joe’s spirits about his return to a normal existence. Marler finally lays it out to Joe—the choice has to be his. He can choose to lead a normal, productive life as a doctor and as a husband to the best wife he could have, or he can choose to become an invalid and live on the outside looking in for the rest of his days, sentencing Sarah to the same fate. Realizing the selfishness of what he’s doing to —Sarah as well as the narrowness of the confinement he’s set for himself, Joe begins to see his preoccupation with his illness as the self-pity it really is and decides he’s ready to return to the hospital for a one hour shift each day. Sarah is overjoyed by his turnabout, but full happiness is hers on the day she overhears Joe telling a fearful patient that the world is beautiful and worth any. effort to get back into it. Steve and Adam are thrilled to learn that Cedars has been the recipient of the Levy Grant for expansion of hospital property. But they have learned, as they report to Ed, that the land they were hoping to build the new research facility on, the land immediately adjacent to the hospital, has been purchased by Dr. Justin Marler. Both Adam and Steve feel that Justin is expanding a power base at Cedars and the land purchase is just one more block in Justin’s power play. When Ed asks Marler why he purchased this particular parcel of land, Marler explains that he bought it with the express intention of someday building his own offices and facilities convenient to the major facilities of Cedars. When the subject of the hospital’s needing the land arises, Marler meets with Adam, and they agree that he should realize a fair profit from his property and that an unbiased assessor should be engaged to evaluate the market value of the land so they can agree on a selling price. When Sarah comments on the fact that Marler is to realize a profit on the land, he bitterly replies that no matter what he’s done since coming to Cedars to prove that he has changed. since she last knew him, she refuses to see him as anything but what he was all those years ago. Sarah insists this isn’t true. But Marler then calls Adam for a meeting and informs him that the land is not for sale at any price. As Adam begins to grow alarmed, Marler continues that the site for the new building will be his personal donation to the hospital. As Adam expresses profuse thanks and appreciation, Marler wryly notes that the tax deductions he’ll realize on this contribution to a charitable institution will benefit himself almost as much as Cedars. When Steve Jackson learns that Marler is to be elected head of the research wing that will be built on his property, he expresses the conviction that this was the exact intention of the gift. Adam, however, assures Steve that the donation wasn’t a factor in the hospital  board’s decision, they were concerned only with Dr. Marler’s reputation as a doctor. | After lengthy consultations and meetings. with the hospital  staff, Ed assured by the head nurse that her nurses performed commendably despite the added pressure of the train wreck, presents his findings to the hospital review board. Steve arrives at two possible explanations for the facts. Either Grainger, more active than usual due to the previously delayed medication, reached for the writing pad and inadvertently disconnected the breathing tubes, or he was in a state of extreme upset because of the delayed medication and.in the excitement a surge of adrenalin within his system caused his brain aneurism to start hemorrhaging. " Upon learning that the review board has ruled out negligence in Grainger’s death, Ed tells Rita, who takes her first free breath in a long time. But Ed hasn’t thought to tell Rita that he’s been in touch with Grainger’s attorney, Mr. Schafer, who, knowing that a woman was at the base of Grainger’s investigation, is coming to Springfield to try to find out who the woman - was who walked out on Grainger when he collapsed —in the restaurant. Peggy, learning that Rita’s “forgetting” to deliver Holly’s message was instrumental in their divorce ‘being finalized, tells Ed that Holly wanted to reach him to stop the divorce. Immediately after, Peggy is torn by doubts, wondering if she did the right thing.She confides in Barbara, who then discusses the situation with Ed. He tells her he and Holly have discovered a new closeness now that they are building their separate lives. Barbara quickly contradicts him: Holly is not building a new life. Barbara gently cautions Ed, saying, “People change, feelings change, and what seems right now may not be right a year from now. No decision is irrevocable.” Ed agrees with this. Now that Ben has declared his love for her, Hope finds herself apprehensive, fearing that she might be making a mistake, as she did a few years ago, when she was sure she was in love with her college professor. Explaining that she doesn’t want to make another mistake, she asks Ben to be patient, and he agrees. When Mike expresses his disapproval of Ben’s overstated independence, his need to be beholden to no one, Hope quickly jumps to Ben’s defense, and Mike apologizes. But Ben, surprisingly, accepts Mike’s assessment as constructive criticism. Later Hope, examining her feelings and desires, tells Ben she does love him and wants to belong to him. Later that evening, after they’ve made love, Ben asks Hope to marry him.And, delighted, she replies that she will. At Hope’s instigation, Bert has a family dinner to which Ben is invited, and Hope announces their intention to marry over glasses of wine. Mike politely offers best wishes while Bert thrills the couple with her offer to' make a Christmas wedding for them. Bert later tells Mike he must accept this engagement with good spirits for Hope, and later, seeing the joy she’s feeling, he gives his daughter his approval. But Ben finds another problem on his very own doorstep: his brother Jerry, who announces he’s left home after several bad fights with their parents. He refuses to tell Ben what they were fighting about. As Ben is showering, Jerry borrows his car and goes out for an hour. The phone rings, but Ben can’t hear it. Shortly after, two uniformed officers visit Mike at home to tell him that his late wife’s car has been involved in a delicatessen robbery earlier in the evening. Since Ben bought Leslie’s car, Mike accompanies the officers to Ben’s apartment. Ben curtly informs the police that he had nothing to do with the robbery and makes it clear that he feels they wouldn’t be there if he didn’t have a record and that his exoneration doesn’t prevent his being hassled like any ex-con,as they tell him he has to go to the police station for questioning. Hope tells Ben she called him earlier, and when he replies that he must have been in the shower, she accepts his word unhesitatingly.Jerry finally returns to Ben’s place and under questioning from Ben admits that he robbed the store,explaining that he has debts. Ben is now in a quandary,as he feels he must protect his brother but doesn’t want to be unfair to Hope. He tries to ease the situation by withdrawing $185 from the joint checking account he opened with Hope and repaying the delicatessen owner. He then sends Jerry out of town to stay with a friend. His relief at having solved the problem is short-lived, however, when Mike informs him that, despite the reparations, the robbery was a felony and the police will continue to investigate. Hope is badly upset to learn while making a deposit that Ben withdrew’a sum which Mike tells her is equal to the amount stolen. This shakes her belief that he _was really home when she called, and she goes to him, asking for an answer to put her mind at rest. Ben can’t betray Jerry and asks Hope to trust him, promising she will have the whole story eventually. But Hope can’t accept this; she needs complete honesty and openness in her relationship and without it cannot goon. She painfully tells her father that the wedding is off despite her love for Ben, and tells Bert to stop preparations. Mike goes to Ben, reminding him that half the money in the account is Hope’s and she has the right to an answer. But Ben won’t say any more and refuses Mike’s offer to represent him legally, again stating that he doesn’t need a lawyer, because he’s done nothing wrong.     
    • And not since. I recall it was quite small for a house that size. And I don't know why you would walk down a narrow corridor to get to the main living area. I hate when the sets on soaps don't have a logical layout! As for Andre his clothing is fashion forward and suitable for his character.He ain't gonna wear no blazer!
    • The last I remember seeing Ben, he was divorcing Amanda. He came to tell Evie that he still loved her, but was leaving town so that Amanda wouldn't blame Evie for his divorcing her. I'm not exactly sure when, but Evie doesn't leave town until sometime after Nola and Quint's engagement ball. I'm not sure if she leaves before or after Justin leaves in Sept(?) of '83. I grew to like Helena when she became friends with Vanessa, once she's edging her way out of Quint's life.
    • Please register in order to view this content

    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • It sure was!  With respect, how does that make sense?  These men are young, I don't see that. 
    • I hope this played better than it sounds, because I'm imagining two separate scenes (the attack by Arnie, and later Charles getting shot). In my mind, it should have been a fluid single sequence. I wonder if or how often "bastard" was uttered in this scene. Fare thee well, Christopher Reeve. I've said it before, but pop culture's gain was daytime's definite loss. Imagine seeing HIM day after day, year after year, decade after decade, conceivably until they stopped producing soaps in NYC.   Well, that answers my "bastard" question. Good lord, the roads of Rosehill are packed with high-strung drivers and/or pedestrians. More sequences that I hope played better than they sound.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I think Ben had already left while under Marland and only returned briefly to reconcile with Eve. The whole thing confuses me as I thought for a long time that Eve left the show to go be with him and that was when they reconciled, but it seems like he returned, they got back together, then he left and maybe they were still together until she left to join him? I have no idea.  It does seem like the interim writers were using some characters like Justin and Helena who were quickly dumped under Kobe/Long, which is a shame. Helena is one of those characters who likely always had a shelf life but Rose Alaio was such a vibrant screen presence, if Kobe/Long had just been patient, she likely would have fit in well in the Reva era.
    • Also, the lawsuit story was not the right story to bring Naomi and Bill into a court battle since those types of lawsuits are usually resolved via settlements.
    • I know that Sara did eventually become Carrie's therapist, but I was curious if the show had her make comments regarding Carrie's stunts of making it seem as though Justin was cheating on Jackie.  Given that Justin cheated on Sara with both Jackie and Brandy, I wondered if it was wise of her to counsel Carrie given the conflict of interest involved. @DRW50I think once Adam/Sara end up married.. Marland didn't see any reason to explore Sara's personal life after the actor playing Adam was released.  I know that Sara lasts until at least Christmas 1982 on the show.. but I don't think she ended up staying on for very long into 1983. The period between Marland quitting and Pam Long starting was the perfect time to clean house on characters that had outgrown their usefulness  (i.e. Ben, Evie, Sara, Jennifer, Morgan).. and tying up stories started by Marland that were too complex (Mona Enright, Mark/Jennifer/Amanda triangle).
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy