Jump to content

CBS cancels Guiding Light


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 392
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I'd say that's a brilliant place to start. And I think Valentini should loan JvD to GL even if it's just the finale. It just would not be the same not to have Ross come back on the final day and speak the final words on the show. He is GL's Rachel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Assuming they've already written through mid/late May, then they have four months to wrap it up. A LOT longer than AW had (they only had two weeks from what they had already written to their last air show).

I really hope they do it justice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Sad day for daytime. My heart goes out to all the GL fans out there.... I wonder how long it will take now for Frons to pull the trigger and cancel one too....

This is really depressing. As others have said however, its even sadder that an institution like GL had to go out like this. Can't a soap die with any integrity? I hope a proper sendoff is created.

Unfortunately I think perhaps 5 years..... its getting real dire.

By 2012.... I don't expect DAYS, AMC, ATWT and OLTL to be on the air..... unless something miraculously happens.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't really count PC/Passions/SuBe. All of them were new, all of them had weak foundations. Also, when AW went, we knew at the time that SuBe was probably done shortly after. AW and GL are different.

OLTL will be around in 2012. AMC, maybe. The other two, doubt it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

In fairness(and maybe my own foolishness) I loved GL after the massive budget cuts of 2005. I thought it was well scripted and beautifully acted for the first...maybe...year and a quarter. GL has spurts of growth where the show even bested AMC/OLTL a few weeks. Regardless of if it was a fluke, there was SOME interest there. Otherwise the numbers wouldn't have spiked the way they did. They should have built on that by making a commitment to their ensemble cast and narrative storytelling THEN. But instead, they let the poor show rot after Jonathan and Tammy get killed off and allowed these lame characters and stories to swallow the show whole.

Ellen Wheeler is great at managing a budget and uplifting her cast and crew members. The problem with her is that post-MADD, she had no one to reign in her bad ideas and without proper supervision(like other semi-competent artists), she falters. Not to mention, for someone who claims to be a Mormon and love God and all that crap, she sure holds one hell of a grudge. I mean, if the stories are true, why the hell would she need to take out notes from that longterm producer telling everyone he was leaving? Is that how you treat a longterm veteran producer that you fired? What about having the security guards follow Beth Ehlers around her old stomping grounds while she collects her things? As IF she would do anything to sabotage GL or their craptacular stories.

BTW, is Wheeler on suicide watch yet?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

We all knew this day was coming, and as much as I've wanted this show put out of its misery for years, it's still shocking. :(

GL, I love you, you might have been irritating as hell over the past 10 years, but I love what you were when you were great and everything you stood for at your core. To me, you were always the most human-like of the big soaps, and when you told stories about hope, community, and unity, you put all other soaps to shame.

I have my memories which will always make me see this show in a good way. Thanks for making me a soap fan all those years ago GL, I know that had I not tuned into GL during one of my school breaks during the winter of 1991, I would have never gotten into the CBS soaps, or soaps at all. Thanks for everything, rest in peace finally, my love.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Oh my, this is just soooo bad...... but so hilarious at the same time.

So..... I wonder what La Zimmer will have to say about all of this? Amelia Heinle, watch your back.... someone with fire and sass is about to be unemployed..... and would make a FABULOUS Victoria Newman....

Gina :) as others have been talking about in recent days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I felt Wheeler's dialogue staff could be very, very good. The problem is the stories often sucked, and the writers would put all their eggs in one basket and fail to do anything else. Hey, let's build a story around Ed Bauer and Roger's son, and fail to secure Peter Simon. Let's destroy our relationship with Grant Aleksander and then spend years teasing Phillip's return. Failing all that, let's just put the entire show on Jonathan. That'll never get old! I was sick of him long before his last appearance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

We all played a role in this demise. Creative types, changing audiences, non-compliant affiliates, changing economy, advertiser mandates... The list is endless, and all those factors came together to bring us to this point.

Moreover, we have known we were coming here, relentlessly, for some time. To be clear...Nancy Curlee could have been writing the show continuously, they might never have fired Maureen Bauer...the show could have stayed continuously excellent since the 80s, and we'd still more or less be at this point. Maybe GL wouldn't be the next one to go...but they're all going. That's because most of the causal factors listed above have nothing to do with GL.

That is why GL is nothing but the "next" to go. Which is why -- for those of us who still love a soap or two, or the genre as a whole -- Schadenfreude is very dangerous. Truly, truly "but for the grace of god, there go I". There is an inevitability to this. The world has changed, and in the US, daytime soaps are not part of that new world.

I wrote over on Usenet (in response to someone doing a Frons-like 'where can the good actors go now?' thread), "I'm going to propose that we don't do this today -- but that's just my opinion. Some long-time viewers are hurting. Eventually, talk of new gigs and post-mortems may be helpful, because they give a sense of purpose to this. But right now, the oldest show on TV, the oldest soap...has been shuttered. For all of us, I think, that deserves ... I don't know ... a bit of love and a bit of 'godspeed'. Again, obviously, just my opinion. "

PS: Actually, if any network wanted a 'better value' soap, ABC would cancel GH and replace it with time-slot competitor GL. But it won't happen. Soaps don't translate well, ever, period.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I'm following the news in Los Angeles at https://laist.com (independent public radio and news) They had up-to-the minute accurate info during the wildfires in January.  
    • That's a bit murky since that happened during a writers' strike. Assuming Kristen Marie had a 2-year contract she left about when her contract would have expired and Sharlene and Josie showed up right before that. Lemay was officially credited as HW from September 1988 but it seems very probable that his anticipated tenure influenced events that happened during the strike which started in April. 
    • I've seen so many posters over the years who are bright, creative, well-versed in soap history, and who care deeply about the integrity of the genre. I'd put the shows' chances in their hands a lot faster than I would allow any of the "usual suspects" to take control of the dramas they've already helped decimate. When I returned to university in the 1980s, I created a bible for a new soap and presented it in my screenwriting class. It was in reaction to how badly I saw the network shows being butchered at the time. The creative process was thrilling; a total joy, and I still smile when I remember the positive feedback I received from the professor and my fellow students. I was used to seeing written commentary from professors on my work. This one wrote me a long, complimentary note on the final page of the bible, but also graded it 97%, A+. I was beaming ear to ear for days!

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Thanks. I do wonder if Rose was meant to be more given the caliber of actress they hired. I remembered Sara and Peggy staying longer as they were still on when Soapnet started their repeats. I wonder if that was part of the reason they brought Jake's brother in. 
    • Speculation about Missy Reeves' potential evolution on basic civil rights doesn’t change my opinion of her. My view is shaped entirely by her public social media presence—which I find unpalatable—and I have no interest in learning more beyond that. I simply liked Jennifer’s hair and dress. That’s as far as my admiration goes.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Cheryl was gone before Lemay came back but I agree with your thinking that he would rather a character from a family he introduced to the show than a family he did not originate.  I remember reading somewhere in the early 90's probably after DS left as writer, their was an either a writer or a producer who made a comment that their intent was bring the McKinnon family back to AW.  Would have made sense for the newer viewers from the 80's.  Much like Lemay's attempt to bring the Frames back from his writing in the 70's in his 1988 return
    • DePriest left in January 1988. According to the AWHP, Rose last appeared nearly a year before in February 1987 while both Sara and Peggy appeared as late as October 1987.
    • Annie was not brought in as an antagonist for Reva. Reva wasn’t even on the canvas when Annie first appeared in late 1994. 
    • The speculation……….very entertaining. 
    • I had forgotten that several Days stars came out strong against Melissa. Good for them!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy