Jump to content

The Politics Thread


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 45.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Vee

    6816

  • DRW50

    5988

  • DramatistDreamer

    5521

  • Khan

    3458

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

trump of all people HATES the COVID bill. he said people should get 2,000 and couples 4,000 plus more for each child, and tld McConnell to strip out all of the pork he and republicans put in it. you know you are lower than whale dung when DONALD TRUMP makes you look bad with a TINY bit of sense. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Can't say that I trust Trump, who has a penchant for saying one thing on one day, then reversing himself days later.

Although I was surprised by some of the items that made it into the bill, I have to see exactly what specific items he is referring to when he mentions "pork".

That being said, the $600 individual payment is unconscionable.

 

 

Also, I wonder whether his pronouncement (after basically sitting on his as$ during this entire process) may be a diversion meant to draw attention away from these pardons.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

I'm not sure Trump would want to distract from the pardons...they seem like something he'd be happy to spotlight. 

 

This feels like a win-win for Trump - he can pretend he's a populist, make McConnell look bad, and then go along anyway, after he has already gotten plaudits for a lot of nothing. 

 

I'll be happy to be wrong, but I can't see McConnell going along with this tantrum. Either Trump will sign, or the veto will stand and zero relief will be passed, with the media and the GOP and various leftists blaming Pelosi. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

He seems to be mixing up what is in the Covid bill with what is in the omnibus bill. Twitter is going nutty about the foreign aid they thought was in the Covid bill, but like Trump they made a mistake and can't be told otherwise. It's one thing for those of us in the peanut gallery not to know ( I certainly wouldn't have), but the President himself and some of these reporters? Unreal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Happy to spotlight that he pardoned people responsible for killing 17 people, including two children?? How disgusting! In any case, Pat Robertson, of all people seem more than ready to see the back of Trump and likely already has his 2024 pick and it is not Trump, which makes me wonder whether the evangelicals will follow suit. 

 

I definitely think there is a power struggle between the Russian asset and Moscow Mitch, but it looks more like Trump is more in a "burn it all down" mode and Mitch, who advocated recognizing Biden's election victory and moving on is in Don the Con's cross hairs. Pelosi looks like a bystander in all this. Also, Nancy's no fool, she won't stand idly by and be labeled by the foolishness of these men.

 

Which is why I said, in my post last night, not to trust Trump, who has been known to make grand pronouncements, only to have to retract them, usually out of ignorance for what is actually possible and what his limits are. I personally would benefit greatly from a 2K check but I am going to need the word of someone who actually reads even a fraction of what is in those bills, and it ain't Trump.

Edited by DramatistDreamer
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members


GOP water-carrier Jake Sherman's thread (click through) on this is instructive - I can't stand him but he has a good feel for these things, generally:

 

 

Like him, I can't see the Dems getting the $2K checks right now despite them seizing on it when Trump mentions it - Schumer, Pelosi, AOC, etc. all said 'sure, let's do it!' But I doubt that can happen atm. What can happen is the GOP can lose Georgia over this because Trump is purely and simply out for revenge against McConnell and co.

 

Another thread:

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This is likely also why !@#$%^&*] Carlson is now using his show to help spread ugly lies about Raphael Warnock. 

 

I'd like to believe this will make a difference in Georgia, but Democrats haven't won a runoff there in decades. It's going to be tough. So if Trump doesn't sign the bill it basically just means we're going to get nothing, and then if Republicans keep the Senate, they won't bother with even the $600. And of course their flunkies who run so much of the leftist space now, like David Sirota, Matt Stoller, Krystal Ball and Jimmy Dore, will make sure most of the blame goes to Biden and Pelosi, as they are already doing. This is why so many desperately jumped on the "Biden told Pelosi to take $600...they could've had more!!!" train. They knew what was coming. They know much of the left just wants more red meat against the Democrats. And that's what this will end up being about, rather than McConnell not letting the money through.

 

McConnell is so poisonous because he always manages to find success through the moral decay and depravity of so many in this country on both the left and the right. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Finland seemed such an odd choice for a location shoot. ATWT went to Greece and later Spain while GL had Tenerife and there were others in that timeframe. But Finland not being a known tourist destination or offering the tropical/sunny atmosphere usually associated with location shoots seems off brand. Maybe they were negotiating a deal with a tourist association and it fell through.
    • I was talking about 1986, but the glimpses of 1982 are about the same. 
    • I skimmed some of the 1982 synopses; Steve was planning on an opening an office in Finland, and I think Jim went there as part of the preparation. That probably was a big issue; AW had already gone to San Diego that year, with Rachel/Steve/Mitch. And to upstate NY with Pete and Diana. I wonder if upstate was as expensive lol  AW in 1982 has always fascinated me, because of how messy it was 
    • That makes sense. What a messy time for the show. And any changes they made were mostly for the worse.
    • The transition from Neal to Adam was very abrupt, and to be honest my theory is that the character of Neal was designed so that we think he is super shady but then it turns out that he was on the side of good all along so Neal could have seamlessly become a hero of the BCPD with no need for Adam. I don't know whether Robert Lupone was hired on a short contract or if he was fired from a longer-term contract because they decided they wanted someone who was more of a leading man type, but I can imagine a scenario where Charles Grant did both the undercover Egyptian treasure/flirt with Victoria and the straighter-arrow day to day police investigation. But in my imagined scenario the MJ prostitution plotline probably doesn't exist and instead he probably continues a relationship with Victoria. The story seems very odd to me. I assume that David Canary would have been included only because a plotline where Steve is going to Finland in which only Rachel is seen in actual Finland seems unlikely. The synopses explicitly mention that Alice can't go with Steve but would whoever was playing Alice at that time have had the kind of clout to get the remote cancelled? It also strikes me as unlikely that production would have approved the expensive location shoot and *then* cancelled it only because of jealousy. It seems more likely that they rejected it because of the expense but then the jealousy part got added to the gossip speculatively, possibly because while it was being worked out they justified not including more castmembers because of the expense. 
    • My comment has nothing to do with cast resentment, but does relate to the Finland location shoot: It may be a coincidence, but Jim Matthews died in Finland in 1982.  Hugh Marlowe's final episode was in April 1982, but the character probably didn't die untll May or June. (I'm unable to find the character's date of death, only the date of Marlowe's final episode). SInce Jim and Rachel had very little interaction after around 1975, it is unlikely Jim's death in Finland had any connection to Rachel's potential visit, but the choice to have Jim die in that location at that time is a head-scratcher.  I'm sure the writers sent Jim on an extended trip (and off-screen) because of Marlowe's illness.  But Finland seems like a strange choice considering the (then) recently cancelled location shoot.  
    • I totally understand your sloths concern about it and I agree with you. Let’s hope the show plays it’s cards right.    Further comments about the last few episodes: - I liked that one of the attendees was filming the scene. That’s realistic. I wonder if the writers will follow up with that.  - Martin and Smitty trying to drag Leslie out was very heteronormative, so perfectly in line with them two as characters lol.    As for the future: it’s obvious the Duprees will come to accept Eva one way or another, but the rivalry with Kay should be here for the long term   On the topic of acting: the only bad actors I’m seeing are Ted and Derek. Tomas hasn’t proven to be either good or bad, so far, but he’s certainly mediocre and uncharismatic. He sucks the energy out of the scenes and I don’t see any couple of women ever vying for him. 
    • I’m trying to think which actors VW were working with at the time, and none of them had been there for a while. Even like Mac and Ada didn’t have that big of a part in Rachel’s storyline.  And Jamie was involved with all that movie stuff.
    • Brooke did ads before ATWT too. That probably helped get her the job. After ATWT she seemed to branch more into hosting, along with ads.  I think I saw Kelley in an ad or two, but you're right she wasn't on as much. 
    •   Thanks for sharing these. I wonder if Charles might have been in the running for Adam. I know Preacher was a bit of a bad boy at times on EON, but Neal seemed to be a step down, and Robert Lupone had played a similar part on AMC. Given the huge cast turnover at this point I wonder who thought they had been there long enough to go.  Laura Malone/Chris Rich would get a remote within the next year. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy