Jump to content

RIP: Tyler Christopher has passed


Recommended Posts

  • Members

This is devastating. As with Billy Miller, I held onto serious hope that he would return to Daytime, and specifically GH. His portrayal of Nikolas was indelible. From day one, it was clear that he didn't just have acting talent, he had soul. This was also abundantly clear in his recent interviews about his struggles with depression and addiction. He spoke cogently and with great insight about what he was dealing with, and it really stayed with me a long time. It also gave me hope that he was going to eventually get to a better place in terms of his addiction.

There is a mental, addiction and loneliness epidemic in our societies and, either directly or as a secondary effect, it is claiming more and more lives, it seems. I fervently wish we had the resources to give people the tools to better manage and overcome the worst of it.

Edited by Cat
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 140
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

Just awful! Some crazed anti-vaxxer has taken it upon himself to blame Nancy Lee Grahn for Tyler's death! You see he says she forced him to get the vaccine. These people just drive me bonkers. 

https://filmboards.com/board/t/Nancy-Lee-Grahn-is-a-[!@#$%^&*]-disgrace.-3481058/

And, the other shoe here: Tyler wasn't even around during Covid! 

We've got 2 problems with celebrity deaths that is unlike times in the past. Anti-vaxxers & people insistent that family & friends grieve IMMEDIATELY in public. 

Edited by Donna L. Bridges
the other shoe
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I had to leave Twitter (X?) - I don't know how the influencing works - I sound old.  But I guess the more followers you get the more clicks you get, somehow the more money you make.  So - there are "personalities" on Twitter/X whatever - that all they do is scour the Internet and make crazy flaming statements every single day - and get people arguing.  

It's all fake to me at this point.  And people really are deplorable.

After Matthew Perry passed - there were all kinds of posts from all of those characters about his 'fishy' death or "sounds suspect to me!"   MUST HAVE an INVESTIGATION!  This is VACCINE related YOU CAN BET!  ALL DEEP STATE!

It's sick and it's just enough at this point.  I don't want censorship but something has to be done at this point.  People just go on there, get their base of followers fired up over - speculation, and LIES.  And WHO does that sound like?

Several months ago I started responded to these types of trolls in regard to other posts, and their responses by and large - they would reply to me.  "HAHAHAHA!  You have 91 followers! You're a BOT! HAHAHAHA! "   or "You're NO INFLUENCER so YOU DON'T MATTER!"    It's scary and it's menacing and it's all bullshi* to me.  

And - to me, how many "followers" a person has just means you're engaging in trying to form a cult of people following you.  It's cultish to me and I'm not interested.  When I SAID THAT, their response was - "you're an IDIOT!  the WHOLE POINT of SOCIAL MEDIA is to GET FOLLOWERS! and YOU DON'T MATTER!"    That is what will destroy this world.  The idea that just because someone is loud and obnoxious that  they THINK their opinion counts more than others, or they're somehow more valuable.  

So sad to see, and it's sick.  I hope his family is OK and I hope they turn OFF social media.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

All sorts of places online have different cultures & in some of them some people are trying to get as many followers as they can or as many LIKES or thumbs up, or whatever. However, a lot of people just aren't going to do that. 

But, apparently Musk has altered the algorithm so that it encourages inflammatory exchanges. In other words when & if you indicate you don't want that kind of traffic, the algorithm gives you more of it. Or at least it is said that he has done that. Obviously I don't know. All I know is that it does not work well anymore. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don’t know why, but this death has me unusually bummed. Maybe because I watched him grow up and develop or that he was something of a contemporary? Or that I knew his lengthy struggles and held out hope he’d overcome them? 50 is no age at all. He could have potentially done great work for 30+ more years.

Vanessa Marcil has been posting a lot of photos of her and Tyler to her stories. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think it's because we were all rooting for him. We were all familiar with his work over the decades and how he can really shine. Plus, this is yet another celebrity gone too soon who had a long struggle with addiction. We hoped he could turn things around and have a successful comeback, just like Matthew Perry and others. It's sad to see public figures succumb to this, especially when there are so many non-celebrities trying to overcome the same inner demons. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I guess RTPP looked worse because it followed Another World, but it's a shame they didn't give it more time especially considering how the shows that were put on following it fared.
    • Please register in order to view this content

    • Durkin was awful. The writing did her no favors, but she was all wrong for the part, lacking the mix of mystery, steeliness, sorrow and hesitancy that defined Victoria. I still have the awful memory of Adam lugging her around like a rag doll. She looked much more like one of the Blue Whale dancing extras than Victoria. And her voice... Maybe I am too harsh. With that said, Curtis didn't seem as bothered. I see from a fan review mentioning Barnabas & Company that Durkin was asked to return for Victoria's final episodes and declined as she had a Christmas trip to Europe with her husband planned and wasn't interested in just a few appearances.  I refuse to believe Victoria actually died during the Leviathan storyline. If Barnabas and Angelique could come back 8 times, she could come back a few.
    • It's a shame she only appeared in three episodes for the purpose of being written out - I thought she was quite good in the little we saw. I liked her vibe better than Durkin that never seemed to quite capture Victoria as a character.
    • He did a lot of romance novel covers, so that might've just been enough for them to get their panties in a twist.
    • Pre-TGIF, ABC most successful 1980s Friday 8 pm comedy I'd say was Webster. Full House wasn't a hit its first two seasons but it started showing growth in its third season which overlapped with the launch of TGIF. Funny thing is, Full House became a Top 10 show with the 1991/92 move to Tuesday.
    • Oakland Tribune, 14 July 1985   AW is another show with Schenkel at helm By Connie Passalacqua For the most part, dictators of South American banana republics enjoy better reputations than executive producers of daytime soap operas. Total authority is vested in these producers, who can kill off a character (thus firing an actor) with a stroke of a pen, or completely change life in his or her soap opera dominion (both in its fictional locale and backstage at the studio) on any kind of whim.  Most rule despotically, inspiring fear in their actors and writers. Which inevitably surfaces on the screen and subtracts from a show's quality. Then there's Stephen Schenkel who became executive producer of Another World last fall. He's been described by one of his actresses as "a teddy bear." He has noticeably improved the show, mostly because his natural warmth encourages backstage cohesiveness, and he believes in personally nurturing his staff and cast. 'I like to be supportive', he said.' I like to generate a certain amount of enthusiasm. I love actors and writers and technical people. And I like to laugh..  ' Schenkel said that most of the factors that have led to the shows improved ratings existed before he took over. There were well defined characters, outstanding writers and excellent production values, he explains. 'These things were in place but needed to be stimulated. There wasn't a lot of excitement. What really was missing was an adequate story. We added Gillian Spencer as a writer. (she also plays Daisy on All My Children), who's wonderful, and it just coalesced. The writers energy and commitment to the show began to give it an emotional intensity and some real passion within the characters." Schenkel, a former ABC programming executive who helped develop Ryan's Hope, is a strong believer in stressing romantic and comedy elements in soap operas. AW is also one of the only soaps with an established group of comic characters, including Wallingford (Brent Collins) and Lily Mason (Jackee , Harry). Schenkel raves about the talents of all his actors, and even has something good to say about the Brooklyn location of the shows studio, which most of his Manhattan-oriented staff loathe. I like the people here. I like to walk down the street and feel their energies, he said. He also violateda soap opera no-no, ' inviting actors and writers to the same party. "Everyone got to know one another, he said. And I didn't get any complaints about actors ' begging for story lines, he said. 
    • Since it's pride month.

      Please register in order to view this content

         
    • National City Star-News, 5 May 1977 TV topics by Peter Blazi Lear’s ‘All that Glitters’—doesn’t The best thing that can be said about Norman Lear’s newest soap opera“All That Glitters” is that it comes on so late at night most people will miss it. Role reversal is supposed to be the big draw, with women the breadwinners, mainly executives of a huge conglomerate. The men either fuss with the housework or fidget at the office as secretaries to their bawdy bosses. A female fantasyland? I doubt it. While the role reversal idea has some possibilities, the show pushes too hard for laughs and winds up with raucous females and effete males. A confident, independent woman is indeed a sight to behold and attract, but femininity need not be sacrificed. Unlike Lear’s “Mary Hartman, Mary Hartman,” "Glitters” doesn’t, but you’ve got to give him credit for trying. Today’s experimental comedy is what tomorrow’s hits are made of. Better luck next time, Norman. (“All That Glitters” can be seen weekday evenings at 11 p.m. on Channel 6.) .
    • Actually Kim Zimmer got six weeks off to test the waters for pilot season in L.A. - she said later she went on many auditions and got one offer for a sitcom, but she would one of many in an ensemble. She turned it down, because it wasn't worth leaving Guiding Light for a supporting role on a sitcom. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy