Jump to content

RIP: Tyler Christopher has passed


Recommended Posts

  • Members

This is devastating. As with Billy Miller, I held onto serious hope that he would return to Daytime, and specifically GH. His portrayal of Nikolas was indelible. From day one, it was clear that he didn't just have acting talent, he had soul. This was also abundantly clear in his recent interviews about his struggles with depression and addiction. He spoke cogently and with great insight about what he was dealing with, and it really stayed with me a long time. It also gave me hope that he was going to eventually get to a better place in terms of his addiction.

There is a mental, addiction and loneliness epidemic in our societies and, either directly or as a secondary effect, it is claiming more and more lives, it seems. I fervently wish we had the resources to give people the tools to better manage and overcome the worst of it.

Edited by Cat
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 140
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

Just awful! Some crazed anti-vaxxer has taken it upon himself to blame Nancy Lee Grahn for Tyler's death! You see he says she forced him to get the vaccine. These people just drive me bonkers. 

https://filmboards.com/board/t/Nancy-Lee-Grahn-is-a-[!@#$%^&*]-disgrace.-3481058/

And, the other shoe here: Tyler wasn't even around during Covid! 

We've got 2 problems with celebrity deaths that is unlike times in the past. Anti-vaxxers & people insistent that family & friends grieve IMMEDIATELY in public. 

Edited by Donna L. Bridges
the other shoe
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I had to leave Twitter (X?) - I don't know how the influencing works - I sound old.  But I guess the more followers you get the more clicks you get, somehow the more money you make.  So - there are "personalities" on Twitter/X whatever - that all they do is scour the Internet and make crazy flaming statements every single day - and get people arguing.  

It's all fake to me at this point.  And people really are deplorable.

After Matthew Perry passed - there were all kinds of posts from all of those characters about his 'fishy' death or "sounds suspect to me!"   MUST HAVE an INVESTIGATION!  This is VACCINE related YOU CAN BET!  ALL DEEP STATE!

It's sick and it's just enough at this point.  I don't want censorship but something has to be done at this point.  People just go on there, get their base of followers fired up over - speculation, and LIES.  And WHO does that sound like?

Several months ago I started responded to these types of trolls in regard to other posts, and their responses by and large - they would reply to me.  "HAHAHAHA!  You have 91 followers! You're a BOT! HAHAHAHA! "   or "You're NO INFLUENCER so YOU DON'T MATTER!"    It's scary and it's menacing and it's all bullshi* to me.  

And - to me, how many "followers" a person has just means you're engaging in trying to form a cult of people following you.  It's cultish to me and I'm not interested.  When I SAID THAT, their response was - "you're an IDIOT!  the WHOLE POINT of SOCIAL MEDIA is to GET FOLLOWERS! and YOU DON'T MATTER!"    That is what will destroy this world.  The idea that just because someone is loud and obnoxious that  they THINK their opinion counts more than others, or they're somehow more valuable.  

So sad to see, and it's sick.  I hope his family is OK and I hope they turn OFF social media.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

All sorts of places online have different cultures & in some of them some people are trying to get as many followers as they can or as many LIKES or thumbs up, or whatever. However, a lot of people just aren't going to do that. 

But, apparently Musk has altered the algorithm so that it encourages inflammatory exchanges. In other words when & if you indicate you don't want that kind of traffic, the algorithm gives you more of it. Or at least it is said that he has done that. Obviously I don't know. All I know is that it does not work well anymore. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don’t know why, but this death has me unusually bummed. Maybe because I watched him grow up and develop or that he was something of a contemporary? Or that I knew his lengthy struggles and held out hope he’d overcome them? 50 is no age at all. He could have potentially done great work for 30+ more years.

Vanessa Marcil has been posting a lot of photos of her and Tyler to her stories. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think it's because we were all rooting for him. We were all familiar with his work over the decades and how he can really shine. Plus, this is yet another celebrity gone too soon who had a long struggle with addiction. We hoped he could turn things around and have a successful comeback, just like Matthew Perry and others. It's sad to see public figures succumb to this, especially when there are so many non-celebrities trying to overcome the same inner demons. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • The way this show handled Nikolas' shooting Hayden, Austin's murder, the long slow delay to getting rid of Cyrus, etc. we're likely to have it revealed in a year when Nina is 3 weeks away from leaving and has had minimal airtime.
    • Interesting. I love my Roku.  No, I don't know. Who? I mean Disney def does. I would think a number of parties have stocks.
    • Is he still spamming demands that they hire the campy chick from The Haves and Have Nots? Or whichever show it was. I don't think it's an either/or. I happen to think Dana, Dani, Eva, Nicole, Kat, etc. are all great. Certain folks aren't going to be some posters' favorites and that's fair enough. But I would argue most of those characters above (and several others) have caught on with a lot of the online audience. I've even warmed up to Martin!
    • We get it, you don't like this show or the actors. You've said that over and over again, Mr. Vanguard America/VDARE.
    • Lol at the WSB hot guy asking Joss if she was okay with betraying her friends.  Of course she is! Chase coming in hot at Dante was a choice. It's also quite hypocritical since Chase is lying to him about Dante's own child and making Lulu the bad guy.  Talk to the grown woman yourself Chase.  Don't make Dante do it. Lulu and Laura had some great scenes. The Rocco/Danny party is obvious an anvil for something happening and probably the Gio secret coming out. The Willow/Drew/Nina scenes were kind of anti-climatic?  I get why Nina chose this path as the way to get rid of Drew, but will anyone ever find out Drew was sleeping with Nina?  
    • I was reading the NYT article on Roku's purchase of FrndlyTV. As anyone who has read my posting knows, I think re-airing old soaps is an imprudent idea. However, I will admit that if large media companies are looking for more streaming content.  And, if advances in AI continue to make the digitization process faster and cheaper.  Those of you who want the owners of the IP to release anything in their vaults may have reason to be hopeful.  Because the makers of TV's want to get into streaming in order to encourage young people to get back in the habit of updating their TV devices every few years.  And, Roku's plan is market exclusive content, that you have to buy a Roku device to view.  And you-know-who has a ton of content to sell.
    • This was  the messiest hour of television I’ve seen since Kenya Moore asked “who is this hoe?”
    • details of the current Health Secretary RFK Jr's insane beliefs - Doesn't believe that germs cause illness; suggests HIV doesn't cause AIDS; suggests antidepressants are behind mass shootings; believes that vaccines are harmful; suggests chemicals in water are changing children's gender identities... and is quick to promote supplements to prevent and treat diseases, such as recently recommending vitamin A for measles and falsely claiming children who die from the viral infection are malnourished. https://arstechnica.com/health/2025/04/rfk-jr-s-anti-vaccine-stance-is-rooted-in-a-disbelief-in-germ-theory/
    • Please register in order to view this content

      I missed the reference at the time, but those DAYS writers really like jokey character names.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy