Jump to content

DEADLINE: Days of our Lives Misconduct Investigation Against Co-EP Albert Alarr


Errol

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 408
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

This maybe an unpopular observation, but it is troubling to me to see social media accounts react to this story from an egocentric point of view.

E.G. - "I'm not going to watch this show!", "I'm going to sign a petition!", "I want the actors to address my concerns!", "Why won't the production listen to my outrage!"

It just makes me think, "this isn't about you" and "it didn't happen to you."  I understand that it triggers people in similar circumstances in their workplace.  But, I believe fans should try to be self-aware enough to be sympathetic without being performative for the purpose of engagement.

To me, it is disgraceful to the people who were actually harmed to try and make this situation about one's self.  It is not the ethical duty of the audience to boycott the production, because that will also hurt the creatives.  It is not the burden of those who were harmed to make public statements in order to mollify the viewers.  And, nobody outside the executives is personally responsible to make sure that justice prevails.  In fact, in my experience, we live in an unjust universe where everyone is not always punished for their behavior, and that is a reality that we cannot change.

This is an awful story that happened to people who we like and admire, but some fans on social media need some distance, in order to find a more respectful response.

Edited by j swift
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Respectfully, did you lose a word? You didn't mean to say, "some* of the fans on social media ..." Or do you actually mean to indict all fans, even the ones who are being respectful & are being supportive even in the  heat of the moment?

Contacts

Twitter:  @PeacockTVCare

Facebook:  @PeacockTVCare

Instagram:  @Peacock

Another thing fans can do is report this to SAG-AFTRA. Here is the link to their contact page: https://sagaftra.org/contact-us1 ERROR

Correct: If you believe you have experienced workplace harassment or unlawful discrimination, call your union at (855) SAG-AFTRA/(855) 724-2387 and press 1.

Sign the Petition! https://chng.it/kZJTdDyW via @Change

Sony Corp. of America [email protected]

Erin Underhill, NBCU President, Universal Television twitter

@Petalumachick

Kelly Campbell is the NBCU President over PeacockTV! Twitter @kellycampbell

818 840 2069*

818 285 2821*

818 840 2069 record a msg.

818 295 2821 CORDAY'S SECRETARY*

*likely unmanned at weekend

Adding 2 emails that do not bounce. Correcting because the software eats the @ symbol. 

Doolcomments (at) dool.net
Kcorday (at) dool.net

Edited by Donna L. Bridges
contacts
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well, there is much we may never know for sure unless someone writes the book of it! But what I heard was that it was definitely Ari Zucker. We have to take what is heard with a grain of salt. 

And @Gina90

Someone at the studio who absolutely knows let me know that "Try to remember when you were young and beautiful." was NOT said to Ari. Now they declined to tell me who it is but that's okay. I appreciate quite enough that they made a point to tell me I had wrong info. That was really great of them. 

Now stand by for people to come point & say LOOK WRONG. After you pay attention to them you'll be free to continue your weekend.

Please register in order to view this content

Edited by Donna L. Bridges
more info
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Days Of Our Lives’ Pauses Production Amid Controversy Over Albert Alarr Investigation

A rep for Peacock confirmed to Deadline that production on the long-running daytime drama has been suspended beginning Monday, July 30. For the moment, it’s for one week, I hear.

https://deadline.com/2023/07/days-of-our-lives-production-shutdown-controversy-albert-alarr-investigation-1235450738/

 

Edited by j swift
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

❝ As Deadline reported, about 30-40 people — primarily women — were interviewed in the investigation, which probed accusations of inappropriate comments and physical contact, including groping and forceful kissing, and revealed a toxic environment on the show that allegedly had been fostered by Alarr for years. ❞

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Is it just me or is it interesting that this latest came from a Peacock rep & not from Ken!!

Okay, been talking to someone who periodically knows behind the scenes true stuff at DAYS & I have 3 things to pass on. 

1. Alarr's been doing this stuff for 8 years.

2. His casting couch  is legendary.

3. He is why we lost "Allie" so abruptly. 

I'm just sick at heart. 

Edited by Donna L. Bridges
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Okay, now it's my turn to ask about the Thorntons, namely Edna. Did she and Opal have any scenes together? I ask because I was familiar with Opal first, so when I found out about Edna, my biased mind saw her as the first try for that type of character.
    • There is no dispute that Jill Farren Phelps had a successful career in daytime based on longevity, but that does not preclude discussion and dislike of her decisions at various shows. Sure there may have been some misogyny involved BITD(we don't know as I don't recall JFP ever mentioning that) but the head of CBS Daytime at that point was a woman and there were other women involved BTS. I think that so long as an EP could deliver, or at least talk a good game they would be respected.  
    • It surprises/disappoints me too that GL's ratings during '89-'93 don't reflect the quality of the show. But when I call it great soap, I'm not defining that by ratings either.  I'm probably in the minority, but I think Reilly takes something intangible with him when he goes. There's a sense of humor that just disappears in '93. 
    • Ok, I know nothing about Another World except their catchy intro song from long ago, but this makes me want to catch!  That crazy mother keeping her son's girlfriend or wife hostage, wow! 
    • And maybe Hotel could have been placed at 9pm Tues instead of Paper Dolls. Not that I thing it was a surefire thing but at least viewers were familiar with the show and it might have done better than PD. ABC's line up was pretty threadbare at that point. And with a big guest star to launch the season - Elizabeth Taylor- the numbers would have been there initially.
    • Any fan of RuPaul would dispute calling any of these examples “drag”. A costume?, A disguise?, A lame attempt at humor? -- yes -- Drag? -- nope
    • No asterisk. I meant that the circumstances during the first year were in her favor.
    • Maybe I am misunderstanding you? Are you suggesting that her success at GL should have an asterisk next to it because she was smart enough to exploit a weakness in the marketplace to gain ratings?  Note: Try not to take this personally—I’m not accusing anyone of being consciously misogynistic. I’m simply proposing that the origins of certain ideas about Ms. Phelps—such as claims that she was unprepared or a poor manager of her writing staff—may be rooted in misogyny. Perhaps, with the benefit of hindsight, it's worth reconsidering those opinions. At the very least, imagine being one of the few women in the room while a male network executive tries to decide what women want to watch during the day. That context has certainly led me to reassess many of my own long-held views.
    • Through 78 and 79 under Marland and Pat Falken smith GH was still heavily hospital based with a mix of storylines. The Doctors would have been fine had they followed that template. Once GH went with Ice Princess all bets were off.Who knows how much TD would have copied that direction? And OLTL, DOOL went in that direction quite heavily while other shows dabbled in far out stories. The thing is that TD was well set up for an expansion.
    • Thank you

      Please register in order to view this content

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy