Jump to content

Y&R's Doug Davidson v. Nelson Branco?!!


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 45
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

I was listening to the podcast You Must Remember This series on old school gossip columnists Louella Parsons and Hedda Hopper and it reminds me of Nelson Bronco, Carolyn Hinsey, and their generation of soap "journalism."  Much like Louella and Hedda, they maintained an old school reverence for the genre, never peered too deeply into the private lives of celebrities who actively worked with them to provide quotes, and rarely cited multiple sources.  And just like those old queens of gossip they were titillated by anyone who teased, but too horrified by actual sex.  They would never dare tell the real stories of "me too" situations, salary disparities, or other humiliations that working actors faced in daytime in order to maintain the fantasy that soaps were filled with hopeful newcomers greatful for adoration.

 

Sadly, their tales directly from the mouths of angry actors have become soap opera lore.  They never gave context to their stories, choosing to favor those who made them feel worthy by answering their phone calls.  They were like the sad kids in high school who were blindly loyal to the popular crowd as long as they threw them some crumbs of attention.  I remember Hinsey's poorly edited book where she mostly republished old columns and continued to use unnamed sources years after the events no longer mattered.  She had obviously witnessed many juicy backstage stories, but even after the cancellation of half of the shows in daytime she spent pages on how soaps could better use product integration to lure more advertising, as if her readers actually cared about her ideas of how to improve ratings.

 

Even this tweet is still about the audacity of a disrespectful actor, as opposed to having any perspective about a man with a disease who was unable to control his impulses in front of his co-workers.  As if we should be giddy with anticipation about the revelation of this secret, versus having learned some compassion about what it must be like to age in a genre that only awards youth.

 

I am hopeful that actual fan discussions on this board allow for more complexity.  I have read respectful and insightful reviews from fans of old and new soaps.  I am glad that the discourse of soap fandom has moved beyond reductive blaming of single producers or network executives to be able to write about what we liked as viewers rather than playing "pretend producer."  Of course, there are still some content providers who write reviews using gender or sexual stereotypes.  But, there are also people everyday to fight back against bashing people in the industry who happen to be female or gay, and being grateful for the representation of women and LGBTQIA members in status positions of soap operas, because we recognize that no other part of the entertainment industry is as diverse as daytime.

Edited by j swift
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Years ago he had a gossip blog that started with TV Guide Canada. He'd do interviews and seemed to be very well connected, but the fame went to his head and he got messy. While he did provide lots of good gossip and broke news stories and did great interviews, he'd also fight with soap stars all the time. It was a mess by the time he was finished.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It might not have been so bad if the industry had mix of good journalism right along beside the gossipy fare but there was never a good journalistic sector (and there were issues worthy of investigation and exploration), so the trash floated to the top and that flotsam  was the only thing people could see. It's no wonder soaps ended up getting so little regard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy