Jump to content

GH to air "classic" episodes


Recommended Posts

  • Members

4/10/2020 - 

 

SEASON 56 EPISODE 84

Mon, Jul 30, 2018

Sonny feels helpless; Jordan assesses the situation.

 

4/17/2020 -

 

SEASON 55 EPISODE 198

1/17/18

 

I really hope they go deeper in the archive... But I highly doubt it... YR is putting GH to shame...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 286
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

To be fair GH already seems like they have A LOT of 80's stuff on YT! heck You can't really seem to find those same amount of episodes for AMC or OLTL....given how the first 10 years or so of those shows are wiped out completely...I'm sure some people would kill to see more episodes surface from those 2 of the late 70's/early 80's....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

In the GL YT live reunion, Kim Zimmer said she is not getting paid for The Doctors' reruns and she's getting a 0.25$ check for her Seinfeld show rerun, so I mean... it must not be that expensive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

To be fair, I believe her episodes *just* started airing so she may have some $0.01 checks coming soon from The Doctors. I don't mean that in a shady way, but I do recall seeing soap actors showing checks like that. I think this issue with GH is just their typical laziness. Even when they've done the Best Of sets for ABC.com it's typically newer stuff.

Edited by Chris B
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Seriously....with so many people home...it would be great to air the old 80s GH episodes.  I bet a lot of people would tune in.  But I think the current show would suffer in comparison and also people can't be reminded that the show was infinitely better before Sonny existed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

My thing is - having to pay the cast/crew of an older episode is a really crappy reason to just not show older episodes. Pay them damn people! It's not like these shows get rerun every day for decades. Pay the people their money for the odd rerun so that you can acknowledge that your 50+ year old show is actually 50+ years old. For a show like GH, the people who made it happen in the 80s are the reason why there's even still a show. Show them some reverence, air their stuff, and pay them.

Edited by All My Shadows
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

How exactly does the payment of royalties work?

 

When Soapnet aired those classic Luke and Laura episodes, did GF and TG receive a check? But does that also means that every actor who appeared in each episode, and whoever owns the rights to the song Fascination got a check too? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

When I was in a lecture in grad school (don't remember which course it was for, I think I dropped the course anyway,lol), I remember some studio executive talking about royalties and I think that every year that passes, the royalties become smaller. In a different lecture given by a former soap star turned director, I remember her saying that she was getting cents on the dollar in residuals for some sitcom work she'd done in the late 70s, early 80s.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Hooray we made the exact same critique to Londonscribe!!!!!
    • I don't think they had any idea who he was this time last year. I think they were keeping their options very open. Same with totally dropping the Trina romance that was spoiled for him in the mags once FV clearly took a shine to him. Frank's priorities are bright and blazing in one color. I do think Gio and Emma seem to have worked out given that she is very dry and sarcastic and he is like a hot golden retriever, but I'd still play the field or explore quads with both with very different people - Emma with a scheming young man (of color), Gio with possibly Trina or someone else, or even a boy. Then maybe put them back together, who knows. But of course none that will happen.
    • Please register in order to view this content

    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • He definitely got lost in the shuffle last year. First, they were implying that he was Drew’s son, then he was nothing more than just Violet’s bff

      Please register in order to view this content

      And then they changed him to being Dante and Brook Lynn’s son, which was clunky at first but I’m enjoying the storyline now. 
    • GM is adorable, charming and fun onscreen despite months of nothing to do until recently, and has a bodacious bod. I'm not cosigning the show or this story - I haven't watched a full episode in over a month - but I think we're all taking the small victories in 2025 at this point. I'm open to testing this theory!
    • I think Jason might've posted some numbers for the syndication a while ago and the numbers for Falcon Crest was horrible. Like 1.5 rating or something, which was terrible.    ETA: it was actually Paul Raven:   New to syndication 60 min Fall Guy 67 markets 3.1/8 Falcon Crest 110 markets 1.1/5 To get into the top 40, you needed a 4.6/9 rating for reference - and Falcon Crest managed to get into a lot of markets to begin with. In the fall of 1985 Dynasty, Dallas and Knots were syndicated (show / rating / share / coverage % / markets): Dallas 3.4 10 51.7 92 Dynasty 3.4 10 48.7 47  Knots Landing 3.3 10 12.5 20  So, Knots as an example trippled Falcon Crest's rating with 20 markets - I'm sure those were major ones but it just goes to show you how much Falcon Crest bombed in syndication. 
    • It's not bad but the stories move too slow. It's the same problem when Dan O'Connor was CO-HW with Van Etten, they have a million stories and they all drag on endlessly with no resolution. I'd argue the majority of the stories airing now are good but you get sick of waiting months for something to happen.
    • Thanks. I must have missed that period entirely for Lifetime. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy