Jump to content

Y&R-Mal Young Out, Josh Griffith Taking Over


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 150
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

 

This is how I feel. I’m happy Mal is out but I don’t care who replaces him because it’ll be more of the same. I feel Sussman and Alden was our best shot at a true revamp, but with network interference you’re going to get a slightly different show with the same overall tone. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That's not quite right...  As Vee said Malone's 90s work was always strongest with Griffith as co-HW (even Malone basically admits as much) even if love it or hate it things like Todd and his legacy were more Griffith than Malone.  The final year of Malone's OLTL in the 90s was a bit of a mess (the endless Irish mob stuff, etc) and that was after Griffith left and Malone was solo (of course it was still better than much that came after).

However you have your credits wrong for the 2003-2004 stuff.  Griffith was hired first yes, but with Malone as his creative consultant and then after four months they became co-HWs again (and I think Malone was more involved than just as a consultant before then--he just wasn't sure if he wanted to take on a HW job again).  However Griffith again left, due to difficulties with Frons, *before* Malone did and Malone did wrote from the end of March to the end of Nov 2004 solo without Griffith and the writing simply got worse again (though that whole run was a mess).  So Higley was cleaning up Malone's mess not Griffith's.  Though I thought Higley's OLTL was so wretched I would never say that...

*Edit I just realized you prob mean Higley cleaned up Griffith's work on DAYS which I know little about

Please register in order to view this content

Still my point stands.

And I see I responded to Whitney too soon--as you said already what I posted.  But it bears repeating

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

First of all , good riddance to Mal Young.

 

Second of all, third time is definitely not going to be the charm for Griffith, who has had a penchant of decent but overall mediocre storytelling with some really banal and pretty contemptible low points mixed in during his co-stint with MAB in '08 and then his 2012-2013 solo stint, which in spite of the show being dullsome it was a big improvement overall from MAB until it went very awry(the Summer paternity debacle) and of course Griffith lost his own sanity in the process. 

 

After a completely unnecessary, very offensive rape story Griffith wrote on Days in 2015, I wouldn't even trust him to write any soap at all ever again. I'm glad that Anthony Morina got a promotion, not sure though if that would make any difference. Too bad Esser and Slater weren't promoted as well. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Eh...the same empty promises every time a new HW takes over and EB comments about how hard being a HW is doesn't give me much hope that the new/old hack HW will be different this time around.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I won’t miss Mal, but gotta say I didn’t miss DD or KSJ in spite of having been fans of both in the past. Paul and Neil are tired and have been for a very long time. Devon is so much better without Neil in his stories.

 

I do miss Victoria Rowell, Tricia Cast, Heather Tom, and Jess Walton. VR/HT are out of the question (Dru would only make sense with Neil still there), but TC and JW would do a lot to add vitality to the show. 

 

But Y&R has a lingering dude problem that they’ve only recently begun to address, and their two male leads are bores (Thompson and Morrow). Adding more women wouldn’t help that without firing some of their faves.

 

I wouldn’t mind seeing the entire Newman family gone from top to bottom (including Sharon and Mariah, tbh), which I’m sure would save some $$$$, but I also understand that would be instant suicide for the show at this point. They’ve invested too much in that side of town over the years, and EB is still the show’s Susan Lucci-like avatar.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Nobody gives a damn about Paul or Neil. They haven't been interesting in 30 years. The female iconic characters, on the other hand, are solely missed but they've been off canvas for ages. I wish the stars of the show would complain about THEIR absence as much as they moan about DD, GR or KSJ and so on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I understand the need to move on as the cast can't be top heavy with older actors, but Paul added familiarity to long time viewers and if Heather was still around,that along with his police role would have kept him involved.

They kept writing him as a grouchy buffoon.

Neil apparently is returning...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/composer-leonard-bernstein-s-children-request-his-music-be-played-in-the-kennedy-center-in-rebuke-to-trump
    • And, to me it is a little bit hilarious that AW fans all over continue to refer to it as Egyptian Dust Recently elsewhere I've been running polls. When did you stop watching AW or What storyline caused you to stop watching AW. You may be interested to know that sticking it out till the bitter end is winning by a landslide. Next highest vote getter is - no surprise - Frankie's murder. So that covers like 60% & next 20%. Then the votes drop way down to 10% and well below but a wide array of reasons are given, including but not limited to  Justine Lumina Rachel having twins at her age, how ridiculous Mac's death the 90 minute show firing JC, George R & Dwyer Hmm, I know there are a few more, in the 1%-3% range but I cannot think of what they are. Sorry, my bad. Should have made notes but I didn't know I would be posting about it. LOL!!  
    • A kind angel has added both episodes to the vault (UK Diva TV broadcast version). 
    • Yes, I think that is the most likely situation.  TPTB were unhappy with the offer(s) they got from the tourism board in Finland, and decided the trip was going to be too expensive for P&G/NBC to finance alone.   I would also speculate a similar situation likely occurred a few years later with the planned location shoot in Egypt, which was also cancelled after the storyline had already started, and changed to Arizona.  
    • What else? #May4th

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • In my usual account on my most used video hosting site with the video title  DAYS 1-8-15 Will & Paul Sex This is an edit I began when I was first teaching myself to edit & at that time I couldn't make it do what I wanted it to do. I pulled it up & finished it this morning. 
    • Or Megan is shot as retaliation for Dave's unpaid gambling debts...while Julie confesses she's the biological mother of Special Guest Star Barry Bostwick's little boy.
    • Finland seemed such an odd choice for a location shoot. ATWT went to Greece and later Spain while GL had Tenerife and there were others in that timeframe. But Finland not being a known tourist destination or offering the tropical/sunny atmosphere usually associated with location shoots seems off brand. Maybe they were negotiating a deal with a tourist association and it fell through.
    • I was talking about 1986, but the glimpses of 1982 are about the same. 
    • I skimmed some of the 1982 synopses; Steve was planning on an opening an office in Finland, and I think Jim went there as part of the preparation. That probably was a big issue; AW had already gone to San Diego that year, with Rachel/Steve/Mitch. And to upstate NY with Pete and Diana. I wonder if upstate was as expensive lol  AW in 1982 has always fascinated me, because of how messy it was 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy