Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members
Posted

A formal review? 

Sunny on The View said he should've been escorted out the building and his Oscar removed. She was appalled that he got a standing ovation. 

Whoopi said there was no way he was having his Oscar taken away from him.

  • Members
Posted (edited)

Today we are beginning to hear rumblings of my least favorite thing on social media; bad correlations (see the tweet in the next reply for an example).

For example, "if Will Smith is forgiven by Hollywood for assault why can't they forgive person X (used to defend everyone from Roseanne to Mel Gibson).

We all know that's not how public perception works.  We all know people in all professions can have a variety of opinions.  We all know that we can only be responsible for our own attitudes and beliefs.  And we all know the role of intersectionality in the perception of these events.

So, stop the "hot takes" based on people totally unconnected in time and space to this event.  There is no rhetorical logic to those arguments.

Edited by j swift
  • Members
Posted

Just for context with the tweet quoted above(although the correlation is poor at best).

Harvey Weinstein was expelled from the Academy in 2017 and Roman Polanski was expelled in 2018

https://www.forbes.com/sites/maddieberg/2017/10/13/here-are-all-of-harvey-weinsteins-oscar-wins/?sh=6284b504d946

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-people-polanski-idUKKBN25L2L1

  • Members
Posted

I quoted an article in the NY Post after only reading headline, so you'll get no judgement from me.

I was just making the point that these false correlations on social media are foolish.

  • Members
Posted (edited)

He slapped someone. That hardly makes him Public Enemy nr 1!  

Please register in order to view this content

I'm not condoning what he did. It was completely out of line and he should face some consequences, but it was hardly the crime of the century.

Edited by I Am A Swede
  • Members
Posted

To be fair, I think there is room for a cultural discussion about how police intervention with black men, macho pride, and a false sense of comrade would prevent Chris Rock from pressing charges.

  • Webmaster
Posted

Roman Polanski may have been expelled by the Academy in 2018 but he was awarded an Oscar in 2003. He had already fled the country after pleading guilty to rape of a minor in the 1970s. He also had other accusations against him from that period.

  • Members
Posted (edited)

Of course, but the point remains that a correlation between the public perception of an artist and their art has changed from the 1970s to 2003, 2018, and 2022, just the members of the academy have changed.  So, to make a comparison to an event that happened last night, and to which the academy has had a relatively short time to respond, is faulty rhetoric.

In other words giving Polanski an award in 2003 and then expelling him fifteen years later has no relationship to an event in 2022 because the people, actions, and circumstances are completely different.  It is like saying Will Smith shouldn't have to give up his Oscar if the Patriots were allowed to cheat at the Superbowl in 2014.

Edited by j swift
  • Members
Posted (edited)

What Will Smith did was tacky for national television but not evil.
He didn't punch Chris Rock with the intent to knock him down.
He gave him a soap slap.  You know the type of slap a soap character gives another when insulted, but actually less vehement. This was not Carrie Brady punching Sami Brady at the wedding, to the point of knocking her down. This was more like when Marlena slapped Sami for insulting her.

Again, it's tacky to slap someone and use the F word on national TV.  But no real harm was done.

HOWEVER, I don't like slaps, even minor ones, not even on soaps.  And I would have preferred that this not happen. 

There's no way that celebrities at future events will be able to make the distinction between a minor slap and a punch. 
None of it should happen. 

I am a feminist, and I would have preferred that Jada handle the situation herself.  Maybe her choice would be to make her own statement the next day.  Will stepping in on her behalf was (in his mind) intended to be gallant, but it didn't give her the opportunity to decide for herself.  That's the main thing that bothered me.

I do see the point of not wanting to set a precedent of this being acceptable behavior for future events. 

Edited by janea4old

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Oohh...now I'm not sure. Long did come back in '87, didn't she. She broke up Ross and Vanessa almost from her first minute back. Van and Ross are at the Country Club when Josh dumps Reva. And Reva dramatically drapes herself on the CC stairs. 
    • Glad you enjoyed watching. Yes, Michael seems like fun. I am always interested in more of these niche talk show appearances.
    • Thanks for the tag @DRW50
    • Upon reflection, I think you're right, their chilliness toward each other was more recent. She said women on the show in 1984 were not supportive and she still stays away from them. She seems friendly with Susan Hayes so Deidre is the only woman still around from those days, though I guess Kristian Alfonso and Leann Hunley could also qualify. And it might be someone long gone but who is still present in Suzanne's social circles. 
    • I don't know.  The animosity seems to be more recent than the mid 80s.  When Maggie was a victim of the Salem Stalker i remember reading an interview with Suzanne where she said they aired the episode(s) surrounding Maggie death in a theatre and made a big deal about it.  Suzanne was very upset about being fired and Dee comforted her and said that they were making such a big deal about it because it was Suzanne/Maggie.  I cannot find the article but I will keep trying. That said Suzanne's comments on Soapy about how some of the female cast members treated her during her illness was disappointing to hear to say the least.  
    • Anyway... Kristen should have a prison lesbian story arc. And then come out and become obsessed with Marlena so we can move her on from the Brady nonsense. Is that secret room still in the DiMera mansion? 
    • Oh, wow... where can I find this interview? 
    • I'm really liking Izaiah and Eva so far. And why can't I help but feel that something might happen to make Jessica stay in Fairmont Crest permanently? 
    • So Pam didn't create her? I thought she had the whole of 87-88. I'll look around, thanks for the point in the right direction.
    • Please register in order to view this content

      date: Tuesday, November 18, 2025 | Jamey Giddens, Danielle Paige | Steven Williford Samantha, accept the fact you were in the wrong and do not deserve your digital devices. Do not like it? Go upstairs. Read a book. Do some knitting. Bradley and Martin's "we get it" to Tyrell was hilarious and absolutely a parent's thing to do. Loving a bit of history of both the Duprees (via Eva) and the Hawthrones (via Izaiah). So cute. Poor June. I am sure she did not purposefully mean to mess up; we have all been there working in customer service. Shake it off and keep on keeping on! Not twice a week for Vernon's cobbler order... Sharon must be using that as payment for their meetings. I appreciate that Ted still cares about the Duprees despite the end of his marriage to Nicole. Not Dana using Peaches' crisis as a way of taking Ted's attention away from a co-worker. Girl, do not be so obvious. Bradley is a man after my own heart with a simply divine chocolate milkshake. That is the way to go. Dana really needs to dial it back. Money will not buy her everything she wants and she will realise it soon enough. And I doubt Shanice is scared off by her idle threats, either. "With all due respect, Ms Thomas, this isn't a shopping mall." Oh, Dr Wilkes just owned Dana's arrogant ass. I love it. Wigs and personas? Okay now, Shanice ate with that read. I like that June assured Bradley that she will not replace him or Martin in the twins' lives. And that blood does not make a parent. Words never rang more true. Jessica reading Samantha was amazing. Dana would want to involve Ted. Her obsession is crossing beyond dangerous boundaries. Not Dana catching Vernon leaving Sharon's room at the country club. That is not good. Not good at all! Notes: Ugh. Not another breakdown from writer2. This week was going so well. Thankfully, Paige is an outstanding scriptwriter (one of this soap's best), and her words today are excellent. The food at Orphey Gene's does look bomb, so I do not blame any of the characters for uptalking it. I would eat there daily if I could. And gain hundreds of pounds, too. David Lami Friebe (Izaiah) continues to make me sick watching him, but he is nice to listen to. I still really like having June as the central person hub at Orphey Gene's. That familiar face you see when you walk in and have scenes. Dana wanting a second opinion means we could have an incoming doctor, right...?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy