Jump to content

Dallas: Discussion Thread


John

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

I enjoyed the Victoria Principal interview and was glad to read she looks back at the show with love. When Dallas debuted in 1978, she was stunning. She really stood out among all the blondes that dominated the press in the late 70's ( Farrah Fawcett, Loni Anderson, Suzanne Somers etc...).

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'd love to know if anyone else was considered for Peter. Something that I think may have slightly hurt reaction to the storyline was that it aired around the same time that Atkins' older woman-younger man movie, A Night in Heaven, came out. It's like, why am I seeing the same story twice?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

They should have gone with an actor/character in his mid to late 20s. Someone who was a little more butch. And more importantly, someone who had chemistry with Linda Gray.

And has there ever been a more generic name than “Peter Richards”? Even his name was dull!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

According to the National Enquirer, the part and plot were written specifically with Atkins in mind (can't link, it's from press clippings in an eBay auction).  And for me, I need nothing more that those speedo and crop top scenes to stay tuned into the entire season (along with the campy hilarity of Peter and Lucy's disco jeans modeling commercial).

I think if we judge the story from Sue Ellen's perspective and not Peter's, it makes more sense.  She had been humiliated by JR prancing around with women half her age, and part of her healing process was to throw that right back in his face.  After all, she never received any effective counseling in order to assist her recovery.  There's also the interesting detail that JR's resolution was that he wanted Sue Ellen back in his bed now that she was desirable to other men.  She hurt his ego by sleeping with him while thinking of Peter, which was probably her most effective form of revenge.

It is remarkable given the number of episodes per season that we don't get more character development from Sue Ellen in order to understand her further romantic motivations.  For example, I have no clue what attracted her to Nicholas Pearce (aka Jack Scalia, an equally untalented actor), or Don Lockwood.  To me, it always felt like she was drawn more to Clayton than Dusty (how juicy would an Ellie/Clayton/Sue Ellen triangle have been?).  It was one of the issues with Dallas, that even with the amount of filler episodes we got every season, they still have trouble balancing stories for characters that didn't live on Southfork.

Also, wouldn't it have been interesting if they kept the anxious personality trait for John Ross brought on the trauma of the fire?  Having JR deal with a son who was coping with mental illness could have been such a dramatic source of conflict. 

So, I guess my rather long-winded point is that Peter didn't need to be a charismatic actor because it was much more about the idea of desire, rather than personality. 

 

Edited by j swift
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Add me to the group of people who think that Brandon has improved. He has. There's no doubt about it. Especially compared to the beginning. And he's improving in a way that... it makes me think that he realizes what the issues are and is addressing them. Of course, he's no master of acting at this point... but I don't cringe as much as I did. And I've seen people in Bold... I won't even have to name names, because everyone knows who they are... who are becoming even worse than what they were offering in the first place. So... I'm happy that in BTG... people are actually blossoming and improving. It surely means that the atmosphere is creative and nurturing talent.  BUT and it's a big butt... his relationship with his husband is still so lacking and ghastly. I am craving to see more action from these guys. I want to see Smitty's character. If he has any. 
    • Thank you. You guys come to the rescue again. I'll take a look later.   Thank you for the info!!! Now I find myself less confused. You and @DRW50 are amazing.
    • I know Passions used this trope with Ethan and Sam to drag out the paternity, but GH seems to speed through certain stories while dragging others.
    • For any other soap, I think I’d agree, but GH, I don’t know

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Agreed, that there was some strange choices in the episode, especially at the end, but overall, that was some great drama that opens up the potential for so much future storyline. Kat vs. Eva having the most potential, especially over Tomas. I have mixed feelings about Martin/BC though. I thought he did pretty well in scenes with Smitty/MM, but the scenes of him confronting Leslie and of him throwing the books were bad lol she acted circles around him.  It’s similar to what Harding Lemay said about George Reinholt at AW; he could be brilliant in one scene, but then mediocre in the next. 
    • I know some of y'all really like Brooke Kerr, and so I've tried to give her a shot, despite her frequent flat line readings and distracted "did I leave the front door unlocked?" facial expressions. But lord, she is so bad at playing a tough-talking badass that I was actually rooting for Brad today to spill the beans to Drew. 
    • Googling does tend to ruin it.  For those of us who were teens in the late 1970s and early 1980s, you can't imagine how much fun it was to watch the show in the afternoons.  (It came on right after school.)  There weren't any "spoilers" at the time.  We would always try to anticipate how each crime and each mystery would be resolved, and we were ALWAYS wrong, because the stories are filled with so many weird twists and turns.   The head writer (Henry Slesar) and his dialogue writer (Steve Lehrman) invariably toss genuine clues directly into your face in the most unlikely ways, but then they provide a host of "red herrings" to completely confuse you and send you off on the wrong path.  Once the story reaches its conclusion, all you can think is Why didn't I figure that out weeks ago?  lol
    • Does the vault have the original scene and not the short flashback?
    • I appreciate that you are using AI with the knowledge of it's limitations. Some posters take everything it produces as fact.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy