Jump to content

Y&R: December 2016 Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

 

Damn autocorrect.

 

I'm a fan of the axiom "Once someone shows you who they are, believe them." So that's how I'm going to approach the presentation of black characters on this show until I have a solid reason not to because this show has shown over the decades that they will always be second-class citizens.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Yes, the first two days when no one was on but white characters, it was all well

 done. But when it came time to write for POC, the struggle began. Typical soap writer. Nothing new to see here. And that is the crux of the discussion. 

 

I must admit I don't quite get this need to shut up folks who are raising very valid points.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Of course we know. Our concerns are from what we've actually scene in hi-def color onscreen for two scripts. We aren't making this up in our heads.  If your opinion that her first two days of being right is valid then why isn't the opinion valid that the following two days are wrong? Both are based off two days of scripts. Don't move the goal posts. 

 

Look, I'm willing to see where this all leads. But don't attempt to silence me. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm not and I never attempted to. You have one opinion of the following two days, I have another; fine, we differ. You think there's nothing new to see here now or ever based on those two days, I think that's premature. As I said above, it is my opinion. You are welcome to yours. We'll see what bears out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The interview comments about Devon's lineage and his wealth were telling.

 

Why is it necessary to divest the character of his money AND lineage in order to "provide him different motivation" because some fans don't like him being a super rich Chancellor? The Abbott & Newman kids have more money than god but nobody suggests undoing Traci's parentage or revoking Nick's trust fund in order to write the characters on a new direction.

 

And why is THAT such a pressing issue in general of all the things that "need" to be "fixed" on this show? Why is it so necessary Devon be "fixed" when other potentially fixable mistakes like John & Colleen's deaths are considered water under the bridge for the sake of "realism?"

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I never took her comments to mean that Devon shouldn't be so rich as much as he has no purpose, which I agree with. He needs to be proactive. I've seen so many negative comments on writing for Hilary and Devon but I love it. They finally have nuance and drive. We got to see their romance and him being active in his business AND relationship. For Hilary, instead of just being mean with no purpose, Sussman has created conflict in her relationship with Devon and actually given her a reason to dislike Mariah. I find it very classic Jill Foster personally. 

 

Im sure something won't work but so far there hasn't been a development I don't like. It's still so early though. We need at least all of January to get a better feel on things. We haven't even had a full week!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Why should Devon lose his money to have that drive. Why can't they just write for him doing business, he wanted to be a producer & they took that away from him. Black characters on soaps only allow to work for other people. That Buzz thing isn't going to last long for him because they want him to answer to somebody else. Leanna (ms) Love had her own little show like that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

She didn't say he needed to lose the money, she said it was a mistake to leave him 2 billion dollars which many agree with. Katherine's death was handled horribly and in reality she would've spread that money more evenly. 

 

Here is what she said:

 

My interpretation of that is exactly what it says: He needs drive, goals and direction. The fact that she's investing in him I see as a positive. She could've easily written him off but she's trying to make it work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That quote can be interpreted in a multiplicity of ways, TBF. I have to read that and laugh because there are plenty of characters on this canvas to whom we can ask the same question of "What does he/she want? What does he/she strive for?"

 

Nick's been on the show forever and I STILL think that question hasn't been answered. Perhaps when he was younger that answer was much clearer (probably because he had much better writing to facilitate that answer) but these days, maybe his one goal is to have a lot of kids and be a good father?

What about Abby? What does she want? What does she strive for?

It's a fair question but it needs to be asked of several characters, not just Devon. That's why I don't care for these interviews, they don't dig very deep and often both interviewer and interviewee are doing a dance of declaring what each wants to hear anyway. There's not much in the way of illumination.
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Well I'm one of the person who disagree. The drive is what the writer makes it. So far the writers didn't make his drive clear. But let it be a poor white character that became Katherine grandson I bet the writers would came up with a drive for him. Maybe they do need a black consultant, let it be me, I can come up with a million drive for a group home, orphan, drug addicted mother Devon. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Elements of it were silly, but it was a small price to pay to get Zas back. I should say there's a difference between in town and out of town returns. It's understandable for Roger to skulk around town in a bad wig and clown suit when he's in Springfield and running the risk of bumping in to people he knows.  Taking us out of town to find someone always has a short shelf life. Then it usually becomes about another character knowing X is alive but determined to keep them out of Springfield. Like Alan discovering Amish Reva. I don't know how long it went on, but it was probably twice as long as necessary.
    • Elizabeth Dennehy complained on the Locher Room about how ridiculous so much of the writing was for Roger's return. She laughed at so much of Roger's antics and how it was hard for her to take them seriously. Probably another reason she was fired as she didn't play the game.  
    • Only thing I enjoyed was Abby / Olivia, etc., and the addiction storyline. Otherwise, I could do without the season.
    • Right? Vanessa had a ball gown for every occasion.
    • Roger's return storyline may have been silly but Roger's return was what lead to GL's last golden era.  It was the combination of Roger's return and Robert Calhoun becoming EP that got GL to finally hit it's stride after some really bad years. It will always disappoint me that the ratings during Robert Calhoun's run didn't reflect the quality of the show.
    • He also gave some of the best episodes, like the episodes surrounding Doug's death. The problem with Days was that Ron had a horrible vision from he top. I don't feel the same for MVJ and nothing that has happened in all these months suggests she doesn't have a handle on the show. Now if it becomes an issue I'll acknowledge it, but I'm not seeing it so far.
    • Jean Hackney was awful and that lead to Ben's exit story which sucked. I liked Ben/Val together. Val's love for Ben was that of a grown woman moving on with her life and Ben's love for Val made him willingly decide to raise another man's children as his own.
    • It wasn't just a GL thing, it was an 80s thing. Opulent party scenes on soaps were very big back then. Even in regular episodes where people are just going to dinner they're dressed up like they're going to see royalty.
    • Just started the May 27 episode and first thing I see is that Willow got an ugly haircut since hte last time i watched   I dont have the context for how everthing went down but I know its all Lulu's fault which make her a bish for what she did to Gio
    • I'm pretty sure he was. But point taken. GL really had a thing for masked and costumed balls/parties in the '80's. Everyone looks fabulous, but those poor costume designers.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy