Jump to content

Most Polarizing Characters?


Recommended Posts

  • Members

I think Phyllis on Y&R is the one that immediately comes to my mind. But Adam definitely fits the bill too. My question would be, is that because of the actors (Stafford and Muhney) or because the character is actually polarizing?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 80
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I think characters like Evangeline, Blair and Téa on OLTL were largely only really polarizing in relation to their romances - they orbited around John or Todd/Victor, and that was the source of the polarization, the couples wars and how those characters behaved or were portrayed throughout those stories. Outside of that furor, nobody's gonna want to burn them at the stake. (I thought Evangeline was saccharine and uninteresting on her own and would have rather seen other characters of color in her place, but so much of her story and persona was tied to triangles that it's hard for me to have ever gotten a read on who she was without it.)

There's other characters who have more bone-deep, systemic reasons for fan polarization because of deeper issues or choices. Todd on OLTL, obviously. Carly and Robin on GH, who are polar opposites of morality and nuanced morality but have their reasons. Babe is one because of how the show handled what she did to people. I think Maggie Stone became one because they could never commit to who the character was re: Bianca. I think Liz on GH became one of those regardless of the whole Jason thing, just based on how some people perceived her personality years before she and Jason made it official. And I think on OLTL, Natalie was polarizing for a reason other than just the McBain wars - it all started with her introductory storyline. She was initially presented as the usurper to Jessica, erasing a mother-daughter bond and while the story developed and changed and things sorted themselves out (and IMO Natalie ultimately became the new heir to Viki's heroine throne, after Jessica's character had been totally compromised by the DID stories) there are still people, to this day, who don't like Natalie simply because of that whole beginning, who see her as having taken Jessica's life. And that's their prerogative.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This could have been way more polarizing if it was Krista Tesreau's sweeter than saccrahine instead of KS's more mature version of Mindy. The audience haf less time emotionly invested in Krista, who got involved with Roger only being on the show after a year or so. As it was, the Alex/Mindy feud could have fueled th show for years if it wasn't for the ill advised recasts.

Speaking of Roger, I wonder if long time viewers felt polarized with the character's more subtle villian in his first run compared to his irredeemable rapist in the early 1980s.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Clear #1: Emily - throughout run, the character was written in so many bizarre ways. KMH was such a trooper during the 20+ years - one minute she's asked to play a high class hooker (hands down the worst storyline she was given - close second kidnapping Dusty) and then she has an all-too-short reunion with IVF son Hunter, which played to a lot of KMH's strengths, only to be dropped.

#2 - Meg - during the last five years of the show, probably #1,

Carly I'd rank below even Lily and, definitely below Paul, Barbara and Craig.

The biggest challenge was that ATWT had a lot of these characters on for years and then new writers would do strange personality shifts or a recast would change everything - Paul and Craig being the best examples.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

B&B---Brooke and Stephanie. I'd add Taylor to the list, but honestly, if it wasn't about her saintliness vs. Brooke's whoredom, I'm not sure anyone cared about her.

GL---Reva, Dinah and Harley. OMG, towards the end, Harley especially seemed to generate such love/hate it boggled my mind.

ATWT---Carly, Katie (especially after she cheated on Mike and then persecuted Simon out of town), and Lily. I'd disqualify both Emily and Meg. Outside of a RH fan war, I'm not sure either drove talk on the boards.

Oh, and Craig, as portrayed by Hunt Block.

Y&R---Christine and Phyllis. Sharon, I suppose.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't know if Phyllis was ever polarizing until they forced that insipid Nick/Phyllis affair on us, turned Phyllis into a giggling housewife saintly woe-is-me stay-away-from-me-huzbind bitch and started writing Sharon as a slore to build Phyllis up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • IF this gets a renewal I can't see LY sticking around    
    • Well, I'm glad to know Devane and I are on the same wavelength, lol.  But seriously.  I don't believe there's any other word to describe the machinations that the producers constructed in the name of keeping Greg and Paige apart.  Greg and Paige made Sam and Diane look mature by comparison! Which would have been just as well, since a character like Greg Sumner didn't really belong in the '90's, as the storyline with the task force proved only too well.  If KL had returned for another season, it would've needed a MASSIVE overhaul, including ditching Greg, Paige, Claudia and Anne.  Mack and Karen would've needed to be there for the sake of continuity; and maybe some mileage could've been gained from exploring Gary's new life as a widowed single father.  (I still would've loved to bring back Julie Harris and have Lilimae help Gary take care of the twins).  Otherwise, it would've been a new era for KL, one without The Sumner Group, or stories like Wolfbridge and Empire Valley.
    • This is "Last Call" for anyone who wants to download a copy of any of these Award show files. Daytime Emmys, Full Episodes: 1982, .. 1985, 1986, 1987, 1988, 1989, .. 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995 Daytime Emmys, Extras or Partials: 1990 1998 SOD Awards
    • What he said. 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Didn't she know when she involved him in her scheme, before the character was introduced? I thought she tracked down Janice's son and poisoned his mind against Rachel in order to get him on board.  It's a bit confusing because in the summer of 1988 we get a lot of Drew Marsten (whom I had forgotten was Nicole's ex) and mentions of a mysterious Countess and also Reginald working to undermine Cory. Drew disappears around the same time Evan arrives, and gradually we get the reveals that he is in cahoots with Iris, Janice's son, etc. 
    • I apply totally different standards. For Felicia & anyone else in Bay City it's reel as opposed to out here in the universe where it's real.  
    • And that is why western civilization is screwed up with organized religion. but thats for another board. 
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Seeing T.R. give Danny a massage made me wonder if Jane Krakowski was considered for One Life to Live's Tina recast in 1990. At that point, Jane was in Broadway's Grand Hotel and probably not interested in coming back to daytime (plus, at 21, she would have been rather young for the role), but it still felt like a what could have been moment.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy