DISCUSS

Edited August 1, 201411 yr by Marco Dane

Nina has been nothing but a delight as Stafford has brought buzz and ratings. Yes I watch the show and yes this board is to talk anything u want GH. You all repeat same things day in and day out about the show as much as I talk about my gushing. If I could give Ron and frank a hug I would our show was going to be cancelled in 2012 we had as much chance winning the lottery then GH staying on the air. To see it thriving ratings wise and the abc prexy giving a huge vote of confidence keeps me happy for its future.

You don't see how Stafford is hijacking this show, even more than when Howarth, Easton and Alderson drove it off course in 2012

Thank gawd it was preempted here and most of the USA for the President.

During the preemption you guys missed a riveting scene of Silas and Nina playing strip poker. Luckily Silas only stripped down to his black tank.

Zeak? Is that you?

Nina has been nothing but a delight as Stafford has brought buzz and ratings. Yes I watch the show and yes this board is to talk anything u want GH. You all repeat same things day in and day out about the show as much as I talk about my gushing. If I could give Ron and frank a hug I would our show was going to be cancelled in 2012 we had as much chance winning the lottery then GH staying on the air. To see it thriving ratings wise and the abc prexy giving a huge vote of confidence keeps me happy for its future.

We actually comment on what transpires on the show. The sentiment is the same (GH sucks and the writing is stupid) but the content is different as we elaborate on why said episode was a disaster. These threads aren't just filled with blanket GH/RC sucks statement. Theres actual substance to back up the opinions, again supported by our commentary on the daily episodes we watch. Maybe you'd come across a bit less trollish if you provided some substance and context behind your posts by elaborating on why you thought the episodes were great instead of popping in to do one of the below:

1. RC is great! He has a contract; he's here to stay.

2. The ratings are great! GH isn't getting cancelled

3. I love my soap! Its on fire!

You'd likely be taken more seriously if you actually contributed to the discussion of the episodes as opposed to derailing it with the same statements which lead to nowhere

Edited August 2, 201411 yr by Cheap21

We actually comment on what transpires on the show. The sentiment is the same (GH sucks and the writing is stupid) but the content is different as we elaborate on why said episode was a disaster. These threads aren't just filled with blanket GH/RC sucks statement. Theres actual substance to back up the opinions, again supported by our commentary on the daily episodes we watch. Maybe you'd come across a bit less trollish if you provided some substance and context behind your posts by elaborating on why you thought the episodes were great instead of popping in to do one of the below:

1. RC is great! He has a contract; he's here to stay.

2. The ratings are great! GH isn't getting cancelled

3. I love my soap! Its on fire!

You'd likely be taken more seriously if you actually contributed to the discussion of the episodes as opposed to derailing it with the same statements which lead to nowhere

100% this.

We actually comment on what transpires on the show. The sentiment is the same (GH sucks and the writing is stupid) but the content is different as we elaborate on why said episode was a disaster. These threads aren't just filled with blanket GH/RC sucks statement. Theres actual substance to back up the opinions, again supported by our commentary on the daily episodes we watch. Maybe you'd come across a bit less trollish if you provided some substance and context behind your posts by elaborating on why you thought the episodes were great instead of popping in to do one of the below:

1. RC is great! He has a contract; he's here to stay.

2. The ratings are great! GH isn't getting cancelled

3. I love my soap! Its on fire!

You'd likely be taken more seriously if you actually contributed to the discussion of the episodes as opposed to derailing it with the same statements which lead to nowhere

Well said

See EASTMA2 + Jonnysbro + RavenWhitney are all Ron Carlivati...has more than one account on here.

Glad I'm not the only person who thinks so

Edited August 2, 201411 yr by dragonflies

During the preemption you guys missed a riveting scene of Silas and Nina playing strip poker. Luckily Silas only stripped down to his black tank.

Ewwwwwwwwwwwwwww

I don't recall you ever actually talking about an episode Jonny...

Oh, this wins everything.

+1

It's GH fan club weekend and apparently Michael Easton said it was really, really hard for him to transition from playing John to playing Silas. LMAO! Huh? They're the same damn character. The only transition was having to now wear a lab coat instead of a leather jacket.

It's GH fan club weekend and apparently Michael Easton said it was really, really hard for him to transition from playing John to playing Silas. LMAO! Huh? They're the same damn character. The only transition was having to now wear a lab coat instead of a leather jacket.

What we saw onscreen was probably why it was hard bc its clear he failed in making the two characters distinct. David Canary, he is not

Nina has been nothing but a delight as Stafford has brought buzz and ratings. Yes I watch the show and yes this board is to talk anything u want GH. You all repeat same things day in and day out about the show as much as I talk about my gushing. If I could give Ron and frank a hug I would our show was going to be cancelled in 2012 we had as much chance winning the lottery then GH staying on the air. To see it thriving ratings wise and the abc prexy giving a huge vote of confidence keeps me happy for its future.

Jonny, what people don't like, as cheap said, is when you repeat over and over that rc is great. Instead, how about post about what you find that he does so great in the episodes and talk about it. I would love to see another point of view other then seeing you post RC is great everyday.

It's GH fan club weekend and apparently Michael Easton said it was really, really hard for him to transition from playing John to playing Silas. LMAO! Huh? They're the same damn character. The only transition was having to now wear a lab coat instead of a leather jacket.

Smh. What an idiot.

Edited August 3, 201411 yr by Nate4

It's GH fan club weekend and apparently Michael Easton said it was really, really hard for him to transition from playing John to playing Silas. LMAO! Huh? They're the same damn character. The only transition was having to now wear a lab coat instead of a leather jacket.

What we saw onscreen was probably why it was hard bc its clear he failed in making the two characters distinct. David Canary, he is not

He's a flop just like Alderson and Howarth, they DIDN'T transition AT ALL

He's a flop just like Alderson and Howarth, they DIDN'T transition AT ALL

Hey now! They put in a lot of effort -- for a week.

Apparently Bryan Craig and Kelly Thiebaud pissed off some fans