Jump to content

GH: Classic Thread


Max

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 7.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

We've been asking that same question to the heavens for awhile now.

But yes, the cousin thing was a key part of the 1991 intro and the 2015 flashback episode with the young Spencers - Joey Luthman played both Luke and Bill as teens. IIRC Luke and Bobbie's mom Lena was an Eckert, Bill's aunt.

Edited by Vee
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Lena and Fred Eckert are siblings. Fred wasn't happy when Lena married Tim Spencer, Bobbie, Luke, and Pat's father. That was the source of the supposed feud between the Eckerts and the Spencers. I'm in early March, 1991, and Ruby (at bequest of Bobbie) has decided to make an ongoing commercial order from Eckert's for the diner, which should end some of the bad blood. What wasn't resolved will end in late May, 1991, when Fred Eckert has his heart attack. 

I suspect that the Eckerts were from some soap that Monty had spent the past year or so prior to returning to GH trying to launch. She was living in Portland with her husband and was trying to establish a production facility where she was going to develop said show. When ABC signed Monty, a development deal for a new soap was attached, but I'm not sure if ABC was really ready to cut the cord with "Loving" yet. Anyway, I suspect the Eckerts were the central family of that show. 

I am wondering if the Eckert/Spencer connection was a result of signing Tony Geary rather than developing a story for Tony as a new character. I think Bill (accused of sabotage) and Bobbie (a pariah because of the baby swap) had some potential on paper, but even eliminating the cousin element there is no sexual chemistry between Geary and Zeman. 

Most of the references this spring to Eckerts has been in relation to donuts. There is supposedly a late night donut window (according to Kristina) and Sam or someone brought donuts from Eckerts' to Dante's homecoming. 

March, 1991 is already becoming a bit of a drag. Everything is either an Eckert story or Mac/Robert related. The resolution of Dawn's murder happens fairly quick (Frisco found a tape of Edge bludgeoning Dawn and it's announced that Edge had been found murdered). There is a bit around the ELQ end of the fallout of the sinking of the Tracy, but it is very community based (how will this effect the poor (offscreen), working class people of Port Charles. I think the setup is for Ned and Jenny, but maybe that's just me reading into what was coming down the pike. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I know it's been said before, but I think the Eckerts sound interesting in theory.  If you drop the whole Tony Geary/Spencer angle and just hired a few dynamic actors for Jenny and Bill it may have worked.  

I personally find the working class PC stuff boring and annoying.  I have no idea how relevant it was in 1991 for the audience though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Other than Marland and Pat Falken Smith, Monty never had strong writers supporting her ideas. The character work during the later part of her first stint and during the entirety of her second stint left so much to be desired. 

I remember an interview when Wendy Riche first came on board and threw some unintentional shade about Gloria hiring her sister to write the show, and that it would take some time to rebuild the show, and she wanted to move it into a more character based direction. 

Edited by BetterForgotten
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I liked what it ultimately lead to, which was people having jobs besides being former spies and cops or the hospital. We had Mac and Felicia opening the Outback, Jagger boxing at Marco’s gym, Sonny’s seedy strip club, the Charles street stories, characters living in modest means again. It helped to reestablish the Quartermaines as the haves in Port Charles society. It opened up possibilities. Riche took what Monty was trying to do and actually did it, even with Levinson it was better than Monty’s first 6 months.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I did like the Outback and Luke's and the fact people could only afford to live above Kelly's.   Riche did have a lot of characters aspiring to "make it" like Jagger, Karen, Stone, even Miguel lol.   It felt more grounded.

Your point is spot on.  Monty made it all seem mundane and boring.  Jenny droning on and on about the environment and the working class is just dull, but I don't know if it's the actress or the writing, or the combo.  I did find Julia/Bill to be fairly interesting.  I don't know if that is Monty though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
If Ron Carlivati had been faced with the problem that Gloria Monty faced after the rape, he'd immediately have killed Luke & brought back Tony Geary as a new character Myron, in a sweater vest, pocket protector filled with pens, pencils & instruments. I wonder if Laura would've liked the poetry he read her. It's a game I play, "What Would Ron Carlivati Do?"
 
Possibly "What Would Wendy Riche & Claire Labine Have Done?" would be a better way to spend my free time. ??? 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't think reigniting class conflict in Port Charles was a bad idea, but Monty acted like there was no class distinction prior to her arrival. Charlene's brood and the Grecos were working class. The Brownstone crew represented the more upwardly mobile / middle class social strata. And the Quartmaines were the wealthy. I think she should have worked more within the existing structure. 

I think there are some comparisons between the Eckerts and Charlene's brood. The Eckerts were cousins to an existing character (Bobbie) just as Decker and Colton were cousins to an existing character (Lucy). The older sibling (Colton/Bill) is more grounded while the younger one is more reckless (Decker/Jenny). Like the Eckerts, the Simpsons were also mixed up with the Quartermaines. When watching the Edge / Decker business partner dynamic, I felt like this was similar to the later dynamic between Bill / Paul. 

The final weeks of Monty 2.0 (late December 1991 - late January 1992) started to get better in terms of the character work in my opinion leading up to the arrival of Linda Grover as Norma Monty's writing partner. 

As @Toups pointed out, Riche ends up leaving the show without a headwriter from mid-March until mid-June so she most likely ended up shaping the show in the direction she wanted with the introductions of Jagger and Karen, the pairing of Bill and Holly, the medical malpractice involving David Langton's death, and the ongoing emphasis on the Ned / Jenny / Paul / Tracy quad. I do think Riche made the right choices as it allowed the show to regain an emotional depth that had long been missing. 

I think eliminating the spy network material was a smart move and moving the stuff back towards the hospital and the courtroom. The stuff that I am not looking forward to in 1992 will be the remnants of that (Holly/Paloma). I like the Ryan Chamberlain stuff that I've seen (even if it can be a bit more melodramatic than even I can take). Riche did the opposite of Monty. Instead of firing everyone, she fires almost no one. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • But she's a DUPREE and that makes her immune to any and everything! 
    • About the only thing that could really get me interested in this show right now would be a "Who Killed Victor?" storyline IF he stayed dead. The writing for him is atrocious! And the lineup of possible suspects would be most of the canvas. Months worth of great story if done well.....of course...not getting done with Griffith. 
    • I really hope you’re wrong. Dani Desperate Dupree being right will make her even more insufferable than she’s already been.
    • I know this board has very strong opinions about Scheffer's reign which run the gamut from brilliant to the nadir of the series.  I'm one of the fans. 2001 - 2005 are, imo, the second best years for the series. The first being Marland.  As The World Turns won Daytime Emmy Awards for Best Drama Series in '87 and '91. However, it wasn't until Scheffer came along that it won again...in '01 and '03. Plus it won for Best Writing Team in '01, '02, '04, and '05, an award it had never managed to win before and didn't again. When Scheffer left and Passanante was the main head writer (along with various other co-head writers) the show began to seriously tank. However, it wasn't just the writing. The budget was gone. The sets were made to be smaller or destroyed. There was all that weird hand held camera directing for a while. Scenes that were obviously shot in the hallway where the series was filmed. I think '06 - '10 is a roller coaster. There are some storylines I really enjoyed and some that were eye-rolling. Looking in the rearview mirror though, I can see that the actors, writers, directors, and crew were working their best with what money they had.
    • They are idiots! It seems crazy that Leslie is inserting herself so much into this investigation but everybody is falling into her traps. I find it to be an interesting back and forth and I'm still not completely sure who will win. I have a theory but I'm going to wait for more to develop before I say more. I feel like Haley has been more on the sidelines so I'm enjoying this new desperate streak she appears to be developing. I'm curious how it'll manifest overtime. I also agree with Dani that I am not convinced she's pregnant. I think she's trying to get pregnant but really just see's herself fading into the background and wants attention and validation from Dani and her family.
    • Thanks for sharing; the set, wow. Ten times better than the "penthouse" she lives in now (is that a surprise, though?).
    • I'd be happy to!

      Please register in order to view this content

        I just read the intro and first chapter and I'm already hooked. I know she had a co-author, but I can tell Kim is a firecracker and I'd love to have wine with her and talk sh!t haha. It makes reading the book pretty easy and entertaining. Intro - I had no idea she got a DUI! She shared 3 bottles of wine with a friend at dinner one night in LA, got in her car, was pulled over and thrown in jail overnight.  She admitted it wasn't her first time drinking and driving, but learned a valuable lesson that night. Out of the gate, she's not holding back or hiding anything. Chapter 1 - the announcement that GL was being cancelled. She was driving to Peapack and got a call from Bradley Cole who told her the news. First, that's BS that as one of the faces of GL, you hear the big news from a fellow co-star on your way to work. Granted, the "suits" were traveling to Peapack that day to tell the cast and crew, but still, seems icky. Ironically the news came on April Fools Day. Apparently that was the last day the network could decide whether to cancel or renew, but to Kim's point, couldn't they just pick the day before to avoid the callousness of the 'holiday'. Obviously a sad day in GL history. I thought it was funny, she said the one thing she thought of is "what would Susan Lucci do" in this situation, post-cancellation. And of course she said she'd "find something to hawk on the Home Shopping Network"  You all would know better than me, but part of the title of her book is "seven husbands" and in her intro, she uses Reva's full name: Reva Shayne-Lewis-Lewis-Spaulding-Lewis-Winslow-Cooper-Lewis-Lewis-O'Neill.  However, in the first chapter, she said Bradley Cole was "her 8th (or was it 9th?) husband". Well, Kim, that already contradicts the title of your book and your character's name you touted. 
    • He also was following Holly May 22, 2025 per update (link to post) from @JAS0N47  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy