Jump to content

AMC: Hubbard birth spoilers


Recommended Posts

  • Members

"There was this guy & he was walking down the street & he kept walking then he found something & then he lost it & there was this car with a guy in it then he got something & there was this dog & he was barking because the window was open not so muchhe could jump out but THE END!"

LOL! One of the best Roseanne moments ever!

Of course burying a baby (period, let alone by hand) is beyond sad and, yes, creepy and usually left to mentally ill characters in theatre and film. You never know what's spin with these people, but at least it sounds like that scene was handled well and played beautifully by Darnell.

Participating in this thread has affirmed my soap viewing ability to accept/reject/disconnect at will... a skill I've had to acquire in order to go on enjoying these shows while seeing them for what they are, all the incompetence and crap that gets squised out from BTS. Regardless of how THEY make Jesse or any other character I have enjoyed look, I can see beyond the faults in the writing, the agendas, whatever, it won't change my opinions of the characters when I see that they are clearly being mishandled in spite of themselves. The best I can do is write a strong letter expressing my disdain for the character assassination and hope that it doesn't fall on blind eyes. My other alternatives are not to watch, or as I suggest, watch with my own mental edit button at work. It shouldn't have to be this way, but this is what soaps have become (for me, at least).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 299
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I think JR has his moments.

Denise...I'm not even sure why she's still there, as they lost interest in Randi years ago. I'm sure she could find better jobs modeling or posing with various flaccid primetime and action movie names.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

While I see the point others are making about happiness and etc. being boring and being an easy way to the backburner, the point remains that in a genre and on a network where babyswitches are as common as infidelity these days, there are just some of us suffering from babyswitch fatigue. What puzzles me even more is this is a rehash of stories that happened like a year ago, like the whole Bailey mess.

And I ask, where is the pay off for viewers in all of this, for those that have been invested in Angie's blindness/pregnancy story?

This reminds of me another one of DK's brilliant stories that involved another preposterous babyswitch. If David is going to be involved, don't hold your breath at him NOT playing a cartoon character.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

AFAIC, Jesse has been ruined by this latest development (if not before then), so...

Let Jesse manage to keep up the charade for awhile, even as others - Frankie, Randi, even Tad - begin to have their doubts (that "Lucy" is not really his and Angie's baby).

Jesse is shot and killed in a big showdown with Ricky during the climax of the "Who (Cares Who) Killed Zach Slater?" storyline. Before he goes, however, he finally reveals the truth to Frankie, who must in turn tell Angie. As much as Angie is heartbroken over losing Jesse again, she is also angry with him - for switching the babies and for not doing right by the child before his death.

Angie undoes Jesse's mistake, giving Maya back her daughter just as she regains her sight. Fortunately for Angie, though, the baby will remain forever tied to the Hubbards, now that Frankie has fallen for Maya, putting his marriage to Randi in jeopardy.

And here I thought the collective Jedi mind trick had worked. ;-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

No. Well, maybe. Once I bring back Greg Nelson (Laurence Lau) to see whether sparks could fly between him and Angie (SHUT UP, FRONS!), I might bring back Jacob as a "spoiler," if you will, to their budding romance. Depending on how everything plays out chemistry-wise, it ends with Greg and Angie together and happy, and Jacob returning to...where is he again? Paris? Or, Jacob and Angie reunite, and Greg gradually becomes part of a love triangle between Liza and Colby (with Colby out to steal him away from her mother, rather than the other way around). Or, Greg and Angie get engaged, and Jacob sticks around, eventually becoming involved with Kendall, once she and Griffin break up over his ex-girlfriend, Christina, coming to town.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Ooh Greg. Now THAT would start some mess! That would be so deliciously complicated. As long as we're fanfic-ing, I would like to bring Cliff and Nina back to town (Jack Abbott be damned) and let Angie and Cliff's past dalliance cause issues for the Warners and the Hubbards. Cliff would make a wonderful enemy for David which would draw him towards Angie while David would find himself pulled toward Nina played by the luminous Taylor Miller who will come back to take an interest in Cortlandt. Plus Cliff/Angie would be a lovely full-circle "[!@#$%^&*] you" to the bigots AMC chose to placate all those years ago.

And before somebody jumps in to ask "What about Jacob?" I never saw Jacob so I have no opinion on him but I have a hard time thinking that I could ever see Darnell as anyone but Jesse especially in Pine Valley.

Ignore the jackasses. We have an alt-AMC to write! :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

marceline, it's been so long, I might feel the same as you now, but I remember Jacob as being very different to Jesse. I thought he was cooler, calmer, more willing to step back. I think PV could use that type of male character at the moment.

I know it's not going to happen, I just think there's a lot of untapped potential.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I've gotten so bored with Peter Bergman in recent years but I saw such great chemistry between Cliff and Angie. With one exception (Neil and Victoria on Y&R), it seems like the interracial romances that had such outcry also had a lot of great connection and potential.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • That’s been my main issue with his response. It didn’t feel that earned by what came before. Definitely needed to see more of the Richardsons as a full family unit prior to all of this.
    • Bingo! I thought the exact same thing. Martin's anger feels so out of place, because we've hardly seen him interact with his parents. Vernon and him have more of a father/son relationship and we've seen their dynamic more fully play out. While obviously Ted and Marton are father and son, it felt a bit empty because we haven't really seen them bond or truly connect in any scenes.
    • Leslie inferred over 20 years ago, so Eva and Kat are over 20 at least 
    • As it happens, 40 years ago this week, ABC and CBS revealed their 1985-86 fall schedules. NBC revealed theirs the week before. ABC's would end up changing. The original plan for Tuesdays was to have Diff'rent Strokes lead the night, with He's the Mayor at 8:30, followed by Who's the Boss at 9, Growing Pains at 9:30, and Moonlighting at 10. There was some surprise over MacGruder & Loud not getting renewed, but it was considered part of Aaron Spelling's declining influence at the network. Yes, Dynasty was still a hit (for a while longer), but Aaron's shows steadily took up less and less of the schedule. Fall 1984: Seven hours, five of which were new programming (Dynasty, Hotel, Glitter, Matt Houston, T.J. Hooker, The Love Boat, Finder of Lost Loves; MacGruder & Loud aired at midseason, by which time Glitter was gone.). Fall 1985: Five hours, two of which were new programming (Dynasty, Hotel, The Colbys, Hollywood Beat, The Love Boat). Fall 1986: Three-and-a-half hours, a half-hour of which was new programming (Dynasty, Hotel, The Colbys, Life With Lucy). Fall 1987: Two hours, none of which was new programming (Dynasty and Hotel; HeartBeat premiered at midseason). Fall-winter 1988: Two hours, none of which was new programming (Dynasty and HeartBeat). This led to Variety's infamous shady headline in spring 1989: "Aaron's Dynasty Over"
    • I hope for a multi-year renewal, too! This is the only show I've been excited to see the next episode in forever. Considering their demos are quite decent. the initial episodes showed there is still an interest in daytime, and it has helped to boost the rest of the soap line up at times, it should be around for a while. 
    • Please register in order to view this content

    • I agree.  How many times did we have to watch Bobby vs. J.R., or Blake vs. Alexis, knowing that nothing would change at the end, and that everything would go back to status quo, so that they could fight the same, exhausting battles all over again?  If nothing else, I give FC and KL credit for trying to keep things fresh, even if I think FC, in particular, went too far in the other direction and became unrecognizable even to the most diehard fans. Exactly.  Plus, because viewers were so burned out by the kind of serialized storytelling that was beginning to affect even half-hour comedies, I think MSW represented a nice change of pace.  You didn't have to watch every week, or watch from the beginning of each season, to know what was going on with Miss Fletcher.  Instead, you could watch a complete story in one episode, de-stress from whatever had happened in your own life last week, gear yourself up for the week ahead, and be okay. If you notice, though, there were differences between those two shows and what Aaron Spelling had produced in the past.  For one thing, there was a greater emphasis on youth; and while characters on 90210 and MP certainly had more disposable incomes than the average viewer, their wealth wasn't as opulent as what we'd seen on DYNASTY or on "Hart to Hart."  Even the battles among Alison, Amanda, Billy and others at that advertising agency weren't as histrionic as those between Denver Carrington and ColbyCo.
    • I saw a conversation yesterday with Liam with the 7 dwarves hat and Steffy -  I know she did not say re: Hope and Liam said - well look at Finn and you forgave him right?      I know I did not hear Steffy say “well but you can’t compare that to…”  For *uck sake someone call the bitch out!?     You’re right, we shouldn’t compare your forgiveness for the dude with devil spawn seed whose daughter locked you in a cage along with crazy stepmom/mom/Grandmother who has also SHOT YOU BOTH - and multiple murder attempts but you have to exist with them / Hope’s part in a takeover which you know was FAR LESS THAN CARTER BECAUSE HOPE IS NOT AN ATTORNEY…. Goodness no, no the same thing at alllllllll.   When they do Steffy’s absence at least let it be because they all find out what a manipulative ho she is in her own right.      
    • I think a lot of us still agree with that. I do hope that the resurgence in the soap world with Beyond the Gates will push ABC to either bring back these shows or produce a newer one.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy