Jump to content

As The World Turns Discussion Thread


edgeofnik

Recommended Posts

  • Members

Early 1991 is an interesting period. The culmination of the Angel storyline (one that started back in 1988), Hal’s finding out about Jennifer’s true paternity, the Tonio/Sabrina storyline, Bob and Kim’s ongoing saga.

The Classic ATWT SOD Tumblr has also been a good backup source of info for any missing episodes - https://classicsodatwt.tumblr.com/?amp_see_more=1

There was a question a few years ago on this thread about what happened to Colin Crowley, Sabrina’s ex. According to the Tumblr, he was indeed killed off by Richard Tyrell in late 1990 via a heroin overdose on the orders of Tonio.

 

Another thing about early 1991 - the whole Darryl/Carolyn Crawford storyline! And it took me a while to realise that Carolyn Crawford = Maeve Stoddard!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 17.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • DRW50

    2974

  • DramatistDreamer

    1958

  • Soapsuds

    1718

  • P.J.

    823

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

Colin was an interesting character, but not really permanently connected to anyone.  Wasn't he introduced during the Frannie/Sabrina discovery storyline in 1986? And played by three different actors?   I didn't remember he stayed on the show for four years!  And didn't Tonio leave the show for a fairly long time before returning near the end of Marland's run?

Oh, and that Carolyn Crawford murder mystery!  Must have been the worst storyline Marland ever wrote!  Marland always said, he never wrote a plot without knowing the ending.  But I think he broke his own rule during Carolyn's murder mystery.  That plot went on and on for months, and meandered all over the place. Plus, it featured mostly fairly minor characters in whom the fans were not really invested. This plot took place so late in Marland's run as head-writers, I've often wondered if he was ill at the time, and not really writing at his best.  Clearly something unusual was going on with the writing, because that plot was very un-Marland in my opinion.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I have been going back and revisiting ATWT 1979 & 1980. Does anyone know why Tom Tammi was let go ? I mentioned him in the Classic Y&R thread as someone who could been a recast Greg Foster. I like his version of Tom paired with Barbara.

One thing I thought was odd.....I remember back in the 90's reading a SOD interview with Zenk and Margaret Colin happened to stop by the table as she was interviewed. She told the reporter " She was my Margo and Deas was my Tom".....Hello ? What about Tammi ? I wonder if he and Zenk got along ?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You're right. I think he just pops up again for a few months before Julianne's Sabrina leaves, then for even briefer periods.

She may not have remembered him as he wasn't on the show as long, but Colleen wasn't averse to a few feuds in that era (allegedly). 

I imagine he was let go because he didn't fit the Dobsons' idea of dynamic younger leading men. He was more along the lines of the men who were cast on the show in the '70s. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Thanks for the reply. He played Tom for about a year and I thought he was good in the role. Too bad the Dobson's didn't give him a chance. I guess they saw him as a too Princeton ( ivy league conservative). I never really warmed to Deas in the role or as an actor in general. Gregg Marx was my favorite paired with HBS's Margo. Scott Holmes was Zzzzzzzzz to me. Never cared too much for Ellen Dolan as Margo either. 

The Dobson's really shook things up in 1980 and many of the veterans (Chris & Nancy etc...) were given the shaft storyline wise. A lot of their ATWT stunk (Brad Hollister anyone ?), but they were incredible on late 70's GL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Anything I've seen of their ATWT run bores me to tears, although I appreciate them giving Ellen and David more prominence and I think the Montgomerys were hugely important to fresh blood and dynamics for the '80s. I am not a huge James Stenbeck fan but I do appreciate Anthony's suaveness and good looks and he did manage to make the whole international/lavish era work for the show better than some soaps managed. 

Some aspects of their era work better on paper than onscreen, although nothing about Brad works on paper or onscreen.

If the show had not been in such a malaise, it might have managed their style and personality better. I don't know.

Edited by DRW50
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The Crawford murder mystery was indeed a stinker for all of the reasons you listed -- but it might have been slightly redeemed if Marland had gone with his original killer.... Daryl.  Years ago I purchased a copy of Marland's 1992 storyline projection on eBay.  In it, Marland very clearly tags Daryl as the murderer.  But something must have happened to change his mind as they got closer to the climax, because Marland switched gears.  Which was a shame because having Daryl turn out to be Carolyn's murderer would have made the entire story worthwhile.  Clearly, Marland was using this story to focus on Frannie's penchant for falling in love with bad guys (ex: Douglas Cummings) but for some reason he spun the story in a different direction in its final act.  Which doesn't make sense -- why?  Why redeem Daryl since both he and Frannie were being written off within a month of the story wrap up?  Why not keep Frannie on canvas and truly explore why she makes such bad choices with men (Larry was a dick in Boston, Seth left her for Sabrina, and Sean was a liar and (I think?) a previous abuser.)  But suddenly the story ended with a whimper leaving us all wondering -- what the hell was that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It's like turning on a completely different show after seeing those wonderful 1979 episodes. Marland really revitalized the show. He knew how to mine the show's history for incredible storylines and to introduce characters.

That Brad Hollister actor (Peter Brouwer) looked straight out of 70's porn. I always remember him in the first Friday The 13th movie. He came across as an oddball in that as well. They filmed that in 1979 and released it in 1980. I say he just came off that set straight into ATWT

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Kim every time she walks in on Bob and Susan after the affair during 1990 and 1991…

Please register in order to view this content

Almost every time Lyla sang at Mona Lisa during the late 80s…

Edited by OzFrog
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Agreed. Cassandra Creech does excellent work on the show. She can even keep her monologue going when the baby she's holding shoves its finger up her nose. LOL  I think I'd rather see her with Ben though because poor Ben just never had any luck with the ladies. 

Edited by adrnyc
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I liked this storyline a lot -- especially the reveal that Andy was the father of Denise's baby.  Does anyone else remember nearly the entire plot took place in Bob and Kim's kitchen?  It was crazy.  This was after they had stopped using Bob and Kim's living room and foyer set, thinking the Hughes house would no longer be needed.  But suddenly scenes in Bob and Kim's home were necessary again, so they just used the kitchen.  During that entire lengthy storyline, the only part of the Hughes house we saw was the kitchen. LOL.  And of course after that, we never again saw the interior of Bob and Kim's house.  What a crazy decision.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Well, they usually weren't on the show at the time for long until the late 90's. But yeah, they really deserved a story centered on them, and not through the lens of Reva.
    • Chelsea was doing the absolute most today! Why was she introducing her sister to a woman she doesnt know? That whole scene was embarrassing. Madison needs to stay away from her bc she is too immature
    • Gosh, what a waste with Lunacy. Why have her live with $B, reveal Finn, pardon her, etc What makes this story incredibly hollow is that what Luna is asking isn't unreasonable - to spend time with her cousin father. She's not asking to move in with them. How hard with it be for Finn to throw her a bone by, say, I'll meet you for lunch/coffee once at week at the hospital cafeteria. Lunacy isn't going to hurt Finn. In fact, all her crimes were related to finding her father and it turns out to be someone she's loved her entire life. Instead of course-correcting the nonsense of last summer, Brad somehow found a way to make this worse! That's a skill... Of all the younger actors B&B has cast during the past 5 years, LY has shown the most growth and range. Why get rid of her? 
    • On the subject of sets (seems more interesting to discuss than the actual show)  Some sets we don't see anymore Lauren/Michael apartment (haven't seen that in years) Victoria's house (are Marian/Tessa living there?) Apartment above Crimson Lights (I think Chelsea was the last resident) Penthouse (Lily's home) Chancellor Estate (Devon/Abby) Chancellor office (once Dark Horse) Nick's house GCAC room (used as residence/hotel room for several characters) Some of these may pop up again. The tack house,for example, was not seen for many months before being used again. Have I missed anything?
    • Thanks for searching through everything. Worked on them so long, just too lazy to check for those links myself, so I am glad you chose to do it! I guess I never did type out anything for 1973-1977 in regards to the preemptions, but they are on the charts at least (and this far back, they don't seem to do any of those "breakouts" anymore, so things are simpler in the 1970's, so eventually I could type those out). 
    • I dump on the Y&R sets problem all the time, but BOLD is no better -- and they're not even introducing new sets. All of their sets are years old, and very few look like they're inhabited by people with money. Is that going to change with this move? I'd rather they save the money spent on another remote, which is no better than an HGTV travelogue, and get some new/better sets.
    • The donut posts here make up for a Friday show that was barely meh. Aside from seeing Anna, I really didn't care much about anything else. While I understand the thought behind breaking up all the sadness with "other scenes," I'd rather they moved right to John's funeral. Instead of hearing a stupid story about John changing some minor character's tire 20 years ago, just move on to the crying. I also thought the Chad and Cat scenes were a waste. I realize not everyone is devastated by John's death to the point of not functioning, but going sky diving is a choice. By the way, Jack and Jennifer are giving me nothing on this return. Please leave asap. DAYS did such a great job with John's death, so ending the week this way was a letdown.
    • Add Dr. Montgomery to list of fine women on this show! I hope the show goes forward with Madison/Chelsea and then once they're developed, bring back Allison, who is now divorced or a widow, for a Madison/Chelsea/Allison triangle.  It would definitely be the hottest triangle in daytime.  
    • I wonder if Linda Bloodworth-Thomason had Kim in mind for any of her other characters/series. If they intended Allison Sugarbaker (Julia Duffy's character) to be more in line with who Suzanne was/Delta Burke's portrayal-persona, then I think Kim would have aced that. Yes, it would have been odd, Kim having previously played a different character (from a different family), but Designing Women wouldn't have been the first show with that issue. Or maybe Kim could have played Beth Broderick's role on Hearts Afire. Or Patricia Heaton's role on Women of the House.
    • Sony is probably waiting until Y&R’s lease is up as well. All of TV City is going to be gutted, so they have to relocate at some point. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy