Jump to content

Y&R: Episode discussion, Week of January 25, 2010


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 274
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I totally agree, except that I want Brock to bring Kaye and Tucker together. Not any time soon of course, but I'd like to see him develop a brotherly relationship with Tucker and eventually get through to him. I think that's just as heroic as getting Kaye her company back and it fits Brock's character. Like Traci Abbott, Brock's presence makes this show instantly better for me.

What more is there to say, especially now that Adam is married to Sharon? To me it would be odd if Victor delved into his son's sexual life any further.

I'm annoyed she didn't get on screen vindication and an apology from Victor and Ashley.

I saw a spark between Billy and Victoria as well, but Billy has simply gone through so many women, they need to figure out which direction to go in and stick with it. Billy may have screwed Heather, but I don't see that he's screwed her over. She came on to him, had sex with him and dismissed him when she was done. It was sort of a pleasure to watch his confusion when she told him he could go. A Heather/Billy/Victoria triangle might be interesting or would have been if Billy didn't have ties to Mac and Chloe too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Other than more Victor/Billy posturing I'm not sure what they would do with this story. They already tried their best to set up Chloe and Mackenzie and Lily and so on as his great loves, and now it's just more roadkill. They are always too busy trying to manipulate viewers into seeing Billy as this hilariously wicked bad boy who is so superior to JT/Cane/Chance/fill in the blank that they often don't seem to have time to invest in a relationship between Billy and anyone else. I don't believe the character is capable of love, and pushing him towards someone who looks perpetually strung out probably won't help.

All that time wasted on the Billy/Chloe forced banter and how only she knows and loves the true Billy and giving them a child and all the rest, it makes no sense. But since they have never bothered to actually write for Chloe and Chance, I won't be surprised if they have her chasing Billy again eventually.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Jack and Chloe would be just too much. A man in his mid 50s with a woman 30 years younger. Nope. I like Chloe and Jack's chemistry on screen, but that is too many years. They should just give in and put Phyllis back with Jack. Phyllis is dying with Nick and stuck in this terribly overplayed triangle and Jack is looking like an idiot falling in love in five minutes and so desperate to have a baby. It lessens both characters. Plus Michelle and Peter work so well opposite each other. Jack can be step daddy to yet another little girl Newman and be a father figure to her since they won't let him raise his own son who should be a teenager now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Now, that's just mean. ;-)

At this point, Jack Abbott is too "ruined" for me to envision him paired with anyone else. You don't fall in love (in record time, I might add) with the woman who now bears more than a passing resemblance to the psycho who nearly killed you almost thirty years ago and is indirectly responsible for your niece's death. You just don't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The haie comment is a bit much. You are painting a stereotype of what a business man should look like. Yes, in 1950, they all had short preppy hair; however, now, many of these guys have long hair and wear uber-expensive jeans. I live in NYC, see ex-com looking business men and lawyers all the time. Maybe things are diferent in middle America.

I've noticed a few posters dislike long hair on men. The posts make me chuckle and think of my Grandmother.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think Tucker is supposed to be modeled after Richard Branson. If that is the case Stephen Nichols is a better match than William Russ, although I have no problem with either man playing Tucker since they both can act.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

If I saw these ex-con looking business men and lawyers at their job I would believe that they were lawyers and business men. My deal with Cane is even without his looks to judge on, I don't buy him as a business man. The show even wrote this in a while back ago when Cane was working at Jabot and decided he wasn't cut out for business. If his act isn't believable at least he could look the part. I don't need him to act like a believable business man and dress like the typical business man. I just need him to do one or the other and he doesn't.

I have no problem with men with long hair in general, it's just that most of the men on this show look so much better with short hair than they do long. The big for me is how the show styles the hair, it looks greasy and dirty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I agree about Cane. Daniel Goddard does not pull off the high level business man just like Joah Morrow does not. But we know that Nick got his position through nepotism since he is Victor's son. Cane isn't anyone's son and just because Kay and Jill have accepted him into his family, you can't throw a blue collar guy in his late 30s into this position and accept us to buy it. He needs more than a suit. It was a joke seeing him in that meeting with Victor, Jack, Michael and Neil trying to help Katherine. Cane fits in running that bar. I can see him having a successful small business and there is nothing wrong with that but shoehorning him into Chancellor is a fail.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • tagging @Troppo who tracks B&B episode number anomalies -- see above posts.
    • Thanks!!

      Please register in order to view this content

        haha you did good explaining all that. So basically Monday's episode is gonna be what was suppose to be Friday's episode. Even though CBS and PPlus uploaded Monday's Aka Friday's show before they deleted it? LOL
    • I do mean those two, but when I download them, the Chris from Greece version is from RTL with subtitles and starts with a doctor greeting Stephanie and the rsclassicfanfanforever version is from Videoland, no subtitles and starts with Tawny and Becky? Sorry if this was already discussed. Is the Chris version merged with another episode? That one is longer.
    • B&B episode Episode #9521 (Season 38, Episode 162) was scheduled for Thurs. May 8. It was officially preempted, although some areas saw it, (Some areas saw the Steffy/Finn/Monaco rerun on May 8.) cbs.com and PPlus had 9521 (S38,E162) uploaded on May 8, despite it being preempted from that date, and they never took it down. B&B officially aired #9521 (S38, E162) on broadcast CBS television on Fri. May 9. B&B officially postponed the next episode #9522 (Season 38, Episode 163) to air on Mon. May 12. cbs.com and PPlus had #9522 (S38, E163) uploaded Fri. May 9, despite it not airing yet on broadcast tv until Mon. May 12. cbs.com and PPlus still had the early upload of 9522/S38,E163 available on their websites for about a day and a half, LOL,... (even though it doesn't air until May 12)... and then they finally removed it from their websites.   ALSO... at the same time as removing 9522/S38,E163 . . . .  cbs.com and PPlus fixed the website label for #9521 (S38, E162), which had displayed as "May 8" but now correctly says "May 9". --------------------------- Meanwhile, B&B in Canada "ctv.ca" Canada uploaded #9521 (S38, E162) on Thurs. May 8, because they didn't realize at first that it was preempted in USA. Eventually ctv.ca Canada deleted the early upload of S38,E162. But then... "ctv.ca" Canada didn't re-upload #9521 (S38, 162), even after it aired in the USA officially on May 9. And apparently they were afraid to upload anything new, so for a couple of days, the most recent episode available  on ctv.ca was Wed. May 7,  #9520 (S38, E161). Finally  "ctv.ca" Canada uploaded *BOTH* of these: #9521 (S38, 162) (USA official airdate Fri. May 9)... And #9522 (S38, 163) (USA official airdate Mon. May 12)... listing it as as Monday May 12 and it's still on their website. --------------------------- Meanwhile, B&B in Australia: "10play.com.au" fast-track Australia seemed to know what to do. They waited until 9521 aired in USA officially before uploading to their site. They haven't uploaded 9522 yet. (I don't have access to view Australia episodes, but I can see their menu. I kept checking their website multiple times over the past few days, and I saw the thumbnails and episode descriptions.)  ------------------- That was extremely confusing for me to type up. I probably made some errors. LOL.
    • The one that Christos did would be the RTL Lounge recording (without end credits and subtitles) and the one @rsclassicfanforever did would be the Videoland version with end credits and no subtitles). Is that what you mean by two versions? @BoldRestless
    • The dialogue is so clunky and doesn't  flow naturally. It's like it is written without thought of how it actually sounds when delivered by the actors. 
    • Phyllis saying it sexy

      Please register in order to view this content

    • This is so confusing. So will CBS and P.Plus just be a day ahead for the rest of the episodes the whole week? 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy