Jump to content

OLTL: Discussion for the week November 2


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 190
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

No matter who wrote this show, OLTL was never, ever going to have a bunch of scenes where Cole and Markko turn out to be juvenile homophobes. It just wasn't going to do that to two young heroic teen males. And I wouldn't want it to. I don't see why it's so unbelievable that the teens would support gay marriage, especially in a culture today where yeah, a lot of kids are coming out early and do have gay friends. At least, that was beginning to become the status quo when I graduated high school less than a decade ago. There's always going to be homophobia and some degree of bigotry, but things are not as they were. It's not like OLTL has not done gay stories with bigoted and closed-minded people many times - I don't know why I should act aggrieved now because it's doing a more positive story reflecting a changing mindset.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

My sentiments exactly, Vee. And BTW I think they did show the "other side" - via the protesters, who were shrill, tiresome and one-note. Seemed like a pretty accurate depiction of homophobes to me at the time, and I certainly haven't read anything in this thread that has changed my mind.

I thought the last few episodes have been lovely. The story leading up to it has been dissonant and more than a little out there, but so is the issue - I'm actually a gay man who thinks the most positive thing I've heard about same-sex marriage may just be Ilene Kristen's recent quote: "It's not an institution I have ever chosen to be a part of, but if people want to be in an institution then they should be allowed to be." But I am so proud of this show for doing something so original and in its way beautiful. Even if it goes off the air in the coming years, along with a good number of the other remaining soaps, in a way OLTL will have the distinction of actually going off the air in the 21st century. And it dragged this moribund genre into this century with a few episodes that focused on some of the same values that soaps used to be about in the last century: love winning out; admitting your true feelings; unlikely people helping each other out; and a community that (for the first time that I have seen on soaps probably since I was an adolescent) I would actually want to be a part of it. What a concept. I don't expect it to last - this is ABC Daytime - but I have nothing but respect for the people responsible for pulling this off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't get the argument where some claim that the opposition hasn't been shown. Not only did we have the protesters, we had that cop that Fish worked with, and I suppose Markko's dad (I say this bc the actress that plays Mrs. Rivera was playing the scene in today's show as if her character she was not so vehemntly opposed to Dorian's relationship as Mr. Rivera was). What do you guys want? A homophobe in every scene with Kyle and Fish?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think they could have had a third party candidate who opposed gay marriage. The previous mayor was a big homophobe and he was obviously popular enough to serve several terms, so it was an issue.

However, it's not like the other stories are realistic, and if I have to choose between a somewhat fantastical story about gay marriage, at a time when we can see plenty of opposition to gay marriage in real life, and stories that glorify rape and violence and misogyny, then a few months for a gay marriage fantasy isn't so bad.

I just hope they will write good material for Fish and Kyle and keep them around because I do believe they are both great assets to the show.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

So am I and I've been a fan of this story from the beginning. I just saw the November sweeps commercial and this show is going on FIRE. I have so many questions that I hope are ALL answered. I would hate for the show to cop out at the last minute like the did with BE takeover. Although the set up for that story I found more engaging, as I said I really have enjoyed this story so I hope they don't drop the ball again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrator

I don't even want to see the promo! Spoiler-free all the way, it's so exciting this way - I don't know what's going to happen specifically, but I sort of know who's behind the stalking (if it's who I think it is).

I really hope Ron got the chance to tell the story he wanted to tell: 1. The story that was suppose to happen at the Go Red Ball in Feb 08 and 2. The original plan of who is Rex's father. I personally love both twists, so I hope it happens.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

What do you know that I don't. I'll take any and all hints that you care to tell. If you haven't already guessed, I'm not above begging. I've always wondered how the show would be today if the writers strike had not happened when it did. From what I could see, it seemed as though Ron had the power to tell his stories the way he wanted to and at the pace he wanted to up until the strike and for a short time after and then Frons worked his magic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Rex has become so overexposed and unsympathetic since that time a year and a half ago, I wonder if this reveal will have the same impact.

I wish Miles were still around, I would rather have seen the story about him being Addie's son, especially as that may have given Blair better material than her stories over the past year+.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well, the thing is, and I missed today's episode, but the mass gay wedding episode definitely felt like a little bow was tied at the end of it (no pun intended, knot, bow, whatever). I felt like the revelation of Oliver's true feelings/sexuality was well enough paced, and perhaps his emotional diarrhea once he came out was accurate, but it has felt a little rushed the past couple of weeks. Now that the "event" is over, it's all about how we deal with these characters as living breathing human beings instead of as "figures" in a gay s/l. The hope is that they'll play out storylines just like their heterosexual counterparts, and yes, we'll need more gay characters if we want to do cheating and assorted love triangles, but it would be nice to see a gay couple involved in an intriguing front burner storyline that didn't revolve around their sexuality. I'm not a romance on soap opera person to begin with, but I enjoy waching couples team up Nick and Nora style, like Viki and Sloan when they were trying to take down Dorian, you know, have Kyle and Fish involved in a "caper" instead of s/l upon s/l about how tough it is to be gay. But if OLTL treats its gays anything like its straights, the honeymoon will be over before you know it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I too agree with Vee, but I also say that as someone who's always lived in rather tolerant large metropolitan areas in the north east. I mean, it's interesting, refreshing even, to reconnect on Facebook with kids from middle school who made gay jokes and dropped F-bombs now make grownup comments in support of gay rights and what have you. Plus, going to arts school and working in the arts, I've had many friends who didn't come up in an atmosphere where being associated with gays was at ALL acceptable, but when you're thrown into an enviornment where you're going to get to know people whether you like it or not, all the bullsh!t gets swept away and you begin to see people for who they are as fellow human beings and you could give a [!@#$%^&*] about what dudes on the block have to say about your "F-word" friends. But not everybody's so blessed. There are plenty of people who know no gay people, don't want to know any gay people.

I still say that the way to go is to have a "beloved" character be the opposition, not cartoonish extras. I mean, imagine if Renee was the homophobe. But of course, just like with Clint Ritchie and Eileen Fulton, nobody wants their character to be the heavy. It's funny, they gave Maucieri her walking papers for arguing her character's stance, but would they have fired and replaced Pat Elliott if she resisted Renee being against gay marriage? They probably would have respected her wishes and passed the buck to dayplayers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I know a lot of pretty chill guys who are quite uncomfortable around gay people, and yes with Markko's upbringing I can see him definitely having some struggles with the whole homosexual lifestyle.

The opposition in this storyline have all come from day players and have been extreme, stereotypical examples, it would have been interesting to see a contract character struggle with this issue or if not struggle just be middle of the road not fully accepting but not opposing people the right to live their life.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I think they’re desperately trying to cover his awful tattoos. But anyway them being unable to style short kings properly has been a major pet peeve of mine for a while now.  I honestly don’t understand what some people expect from actors to even begin considering them for recognition. Let’s be real—awards mostly mean that an actor is respected by their peers and has some level of cultural relevance. Actual judgment on the acting itself? That’s often secondary—highly subjective and shaped by the times. I completely agree on both points. If you’re an actor or a dancer you shouldn’t get any tattoos (sorry not sorry). Tomas’ tattoos are ugly too. And regarding the couples- you’re completely right. These writers are unable to write romance.   Further comments: - Kat cannot be this dumb to keep tampering with evidence over and over again. And I’m officially not a fan of the actress—every time she’s in a scene with Leslie, she doesn’t seem intimidated at all. She plays it like comic relief, which is just too much, especially when paired with Leslie’s histrionics and over-the-top antics. Leslie is older, dangerous, and has literally been portrayed as homicidal—Kat should be at least a little scared. • I also didn’t like Kat playing damsel in distress with the hotel manager. It gave off the same weird energy as Dani with the cop. I would’ve much preferred the version Paul Raven suggested, with her sneaking in through housekeeping. • And yes, Dani again accused Hayley of faking the pregnancy—this time even specifying she might be using a pillow under her shirt. (No fake miscarriage being mentioned) I stand by my take: this is ridiculous writing. No one in the real world—except us, the chronically online soap watchers—would even think of such a conspiracy theory. Haley is no Beyoncé. • What in the world was Chelsea wearing in her hair the other day? And this whole thing with Madison is beyond cringe. Chelsea’s coming off as needy and toxic—basically like every other Dupree. • I’m glad the casino storyline is moving forward, but it’s still boring as hell. Honestly, I’d be so here for a plot twist where Vanessa and Doug take Joey out. • The direction and editing lately have been rough. Abrupt cuts, weird pacing… something just feels off overall. There’s a strange uneasiness to how it’s all coming together. • And finally: Tomas is too much of a saint. Where are the messy sluts when you need them? (Vanessa doesn’t count.)
    • Andrew sure has hard nips.
    • I was watching some August 1987 episodes and they brought back so many memories. I had some thoughts: Lisa and Jamie were so dull. Lisa was such a nothing character. It boggles my mind that so much story was centered around her in such a short amount of time. Joanna Going is a talented actress, but the material was just not there.  It was so good to see Wallingford and Mitch again. I know there was talk about Felicia a while back, but these episodes reminded me how integral Felicia was for the show.  Sally Spencer was done so dirty. She is turning in superb performances in an icky storyline. I wish she had stuck around longer. She has chemistry with everyone. The McKinnons should have lasted longer. Spencer had some strong stuff with Stephen Schnetzer and Mary Alexander. AW waster such a talented actress by getting rid of her. Justice for Cheryl too. I also missed Ed Fry when he left. Sandra Ferguson was a star from the moment she came on. She was charismatic and just popped. She had immediate chemistry with RKK and blended in well with Wyndham and Watson. I'd forgotten about the teenage Matthew.  I have no memory of Peggy Lazarus. She must not have lasted long. Was the original plan for John that he was going to turn out to be the twins' real father?      
    • If the new and improved copies that @rsclassicfanforever has uploaded can be manually moved into the "by month, by year" folders, that would be awesome. I personally don't think it's necessary to keep the older versions (which either have Dutch subtitles hard coded on them, or are lesser in picture quality). That's a lot of valuable drive space that could be cleared. Just my view but can appreciate others may feel differently. The structure had been by month by year previously, so I think it would be easier to conform to that, where so much prior work to get it to that format has already been done. Hopefully you can "drag and drop" so the new copies are in the right month/year? Re Clips, I never look at them now we pretty much have the episodes in full. Appreciate others may use, however. Thanks for all your hard work here @BoldRestless!
    • Oh yes defintely, Josh Griffith repeats and repeats the same storylines.
    • Isnt’t this storyline similar to the Cameron Kirsten situation though? Sharon thought she killed him. He ended up being alive and Sharon was being tormented with thinking she was seeing his face everywhere and that’s how we got that iconic scene with her and Nikki in the sewers.   I understand in Mariah’s case this is different circumstances but it does seem like a play on that whole thing. Maybe I’m wrong. I just wish if they were going to make any character follow in Sharon’s foot steps it would be Faith. Mariah wasn’t even raised by her, and her personality is different. I would expect her to take a different path. I understand I could be completely jumping ahead because the storyline hasn’t even played out yet but we’ll see. 
    • Thanks again @Paul Raven Monica was completely without redeeming qualities at this point. I always found the whole Monica = Carly narrative regressive, as I don't think shows comparing characters so heavily is ever a great idea, but she's actually worse than Carly was. Was it the Pollocks who had Leslie have a miscarriage?  Giving her a child, especially by rape, was not a good idea, but a part of me wishes they'd committed to it just to see what story it might have had in later years.
    • @janea4old Your detailed explanation and delving into the psychology and motivations is no doubt the opposite of what we will see onscreeen. As @ranger1rg stated we will get a few scenes and some sketchy explanations. Like the adoption of Aria, most of it will take place off screen.
    • I'm suddenly fearful that DAYS is going to pull a Flowers-for-Algernon stunt and Bo's progress will be reversed.  While @te. is stuck on Abe's tiny bedroom, I can't stop thinking of the size of Bo's huge hospital room.
    • Okay, why are Paulina and Abe sleeping like that?!  I'd take a screen grab if I wasn't lazy, but come on.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy