Jump to content

OLTL: Discussion for the week November 2


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 190
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Actually she was Roxy's sister-in-law. Her brother was Roxy's former husband Walter Balsom (who has long since been dead and I believe at one time was a follower of Mitch Laurence).

I remember the last time we saw Aunt Corrine last year....she was at the Palace having lunch with Rex and maybe Natalie (I've slept a time or two since then lol).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yes. With all that.

Totally unrealistic. In what universe would a mayoral candidate think that if they married someone of the same sex, it would get them elected? No town in the USA would base their vote on a lesbian couple marrying. The truth is that in the current climate, Dorian's behavior would be political suicide, not an election-clincher. While more people support gay issues today, the real world view is nothing like OLTL is portraying it. Oh and on a side note a mayor can't make marriage licenses legal. That would be something done on the state level.

(BTW, my signature is a scene from The Players Club)

If I had your support, I'd have to reconsider my views.

The "opposing" side were the nameless protesting cartoons, who in the end only served to allow Oliver to give his grand little "I'm gay...and shame on you!" monologue. Mayor Lowell was clearly a conservative and he had to get elected somehow, how has the landscape of Llanview changed so wildly since? Apparently it's the only issue facing the town. There was no one running to speak for the Ernesto Rivera's of Llanview. In the meantime, they wouldn't dare have a regular (and usually reasonable) character like Clint reaffirm his prior rigid stance on homosexuality, for fear of pissing off people. Hell, Todd was a Lowell supporter, and yet they even had him keep his mouth shut on all this. The writers had a not so hidden agenda...which was either:

A - Let's go out of our way to upstage the other soaps gay storylines so we can get a GLAAD award...or...

B - Let's create this totally makeshift/unrealistic/cushy universe to make it easy to prop the coming together of Oliver and Kyle, with absolutely no conflict from anyone - except the occasional dayplayer, who no one will take seriously anyway.

There's your wonderful, well-written "gay" storyline....OLTL style.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

So are you saying since they took on gay marriage, you think they should have been more realistic, since the story was about a social issue?

I have felt the same way, but ultimately the story wasn't so much about gay marriage as it was about pushing various storylines. The story was as much about Dorian's need for validation, and Cris and Layla. I think they just decided not to focus on realism. None of their other stories do, they seem to be almost going out of their way to be as ridiculous as possible, so I guess the whole show is this way now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It became totally farcical when they had Starr, Cole, Langston and Markko start becoming android props for it too. When Langston said something to Markko about 'half of his friends being gay.' Come on now. Where? Then they even had Shane opt to skip out on the Halloween celebration to go watch a bunch of same sex couples (none of whom he knows) get married. The whole s/l was very phony and placating, while trying to present itself as genuine and deep on the surface. It was RC pretentiously calling himself "going all the way" with it, but from a very shallow angle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yes, I thought the reactions of the teens was pretty unrealistic, particularly Cole and Markko. Many guys that age are still pretty insecure and there is a lot of trash talk, but I fanwanked it to myself by Cole being Marty's son. As the son of a shrink he's probably more accepting than the average teenage boy. Plus how realistic is it that a boy his age wanted to raise his child instead of going the adoption route, so it's not like these characters have ever been steeped in reality.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It was a major moment. Daytime has not seen something like this before. Was it artistic greatness? Maybe not. But it still was entertaining and groundbreaking...and that ain't bad. Even if OLTL is on some ridiculous chopping block, it will go out on a high, still blazing diversity trails like it did 40 years ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

YES. I love this.

You know, they are in the exact same vein as the Santos parents on AMC. Whole reason why Pat Maucieri's argument didn't stand a chance, there was no way they were going to have THREE latin homophobes of that generation on the show.

"Walter Balsom", say that out loud, feels like you have a marshmallow in your mouth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Killing Pamela was so unnecessary. It was such a nice nod to the show's past bringing her back in the first place, and seeing a soap presence like Christine Jones still being employed. But who knows, maybe someday she'll take on her FOURTH OLTL role.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • @TaoboiI ran into Dani’s favorite party planner again tonight

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I think they’re desperately trying to cover his awful tattoos. But anyway them being unable to style short kings properly has been a major pet peeve of mine for a while now.  I honestly don’t understand what some people expect from actors to even begin considering them for recognition. Let’s be real—awards mostly mean that an actor is respected by their peers and has some level of cultural relevance. Actual judgment on the acting itself? That’s often secondary—highly subjective and shaped by the times. I completely agree on both points. If you’re an actor or a dancer you shouldn’t get any tattoos (sorry not sorry). Tomas’ tattoos are ugly too. And regarding the couples- you’re completely right. These writers are unable to write romance.   Further comments: - Kat cannot be this dumb to keep tampering with evidence over and over again. And I’m officially not a fan of the actress—every time she’s in a scene with Leslie, she doesn’t seem intimidated at all. She plays it like comic relief, which is just too much, especially when paired with Leslie’s histrionics and over-the-top antics. Leslie is older, dangerous, and has literally been portrayed as homicidal—Kat should be at least a little scared. • I also didn’t like Kat playing damsel in distress with the hotel manager. It gave off the same weird energy as Dani with the cop. I would’ve much preferred the version Paul Raven suggested, with her sneaking in through housekeeping. • And yes, Dani again accused Hayley of faking the pregnancy—this time even specifying she might be using a pillow under her shirt. (No fake miscarriage being mentioned) I stand by my take: this is ridiculous writing. No one in the real world—except us, the chronically online soap watchers—would even think of such a conspiracy theory. Haley is no Beyoncé. • What in the world was Chelsea wearing in her hair the other day? And this whole thing with Madison is beyond cringe. Chelsea’s coming off as needy and toxic—basically like every other Dupree. • I’m glad the casino storyline is moving forward, but it’s still boring as hell. Honestly, I’d be so here for a plot twist where Vanessa and Doug take Joey out. • The direction and editing lately have been rough. Abrupt cuts, weird pacing… something just feels off overall. There’s a strange uneasiness to how it’s all coming together. • And finally: Tomas is too much of a saint. Where are the messy sluts when you need them? (Vanessa doesn’t count.)
    • I was watching some August 1987 episodes and they brought back so many memories. I had some thoughts: Lisa and Jamie were so dull. Lisa was such a nothing character. It boggles my mind that so much story was centered around her in such a short amount of time. Joanna Going is a talented actress, but the material was just not there.  It was so good to see Wallingford and Mitch again. I know there was talk about Felicia a while back, but these episodes reminded me how integral Felicia was for the show.  Sally Spencer was done so dirty. She is turning in superb performances in an icky storyline. I wish she had stuck around longer. She has chemistry with everyone. The McKinnons should have lasted longer. Spencer had some strong stuff with Stephen Schnetzer and Mary Alexander. AW waster such a talented actress by getting rid of her. Justice for Cheryl too. I also missed Ed Fry when he left. Sandra Ferguson was a star from the moment she came on. She was charismatic and just popped. She had immediate chemistry with RKK and blended in well with Wyndham and Watson. I'd forgotten about the teenage Matthew.  I have no memory of Peggy Lazarus. She must not have lasted long. Was the original plan for John that he was going to turn out to be the twins' real father?      
    • If the new and improved copies that @rsclassicfanforever has uploaded can be manually moved into the "by month, by year" folders, that would be awesome. I personally don't think it's necessary to keep the older versions (which either have Dutch subtitles hard coded on them, or are lesser in picture quality). That's a lot of valuable drive space that could be cleared. Just my view but can appreciate others may feel differently. The structure had been by month by year previously, so I think it would be easier to conform to that, where so much prior work to get it to that format has already been done. Hopefully you can "drag and drop" so the new copies are in the right month/year? Re Clips, I never look at them now we pretty much have the episodes in full. Appreciate others may use, however. Thanks for all your hard work here @BoldRestless!
    • Oh yes defintely, Josh Griffith repeats and repeats the same storylines.
    • Isnt’t this storyline similar to the Cameron Kirsten situation though? Sharon thought she killed him. He ended up being alive and Sharon was being tormented with thinking she was seeing his face everywhere and that’s how we got that iconic scene with her and Nikki in the sewers.   I understand in Mariah’s case this is different circumstances but it does seem like a play on that whole thing. Maybe I’m wrong. I just wish if they were going to make any character follow in Sharon’s foot steps it would be Faith. Mariah wasn’t even raised by her, and her personality is different. I would expect her to take a different path. I understand I could be completely jumping ahead because the storyline hasn’t even played out yet but we’ll see. 
    • Thanks again @Paul Raven Monica was completely without redeeming qualities at this point. I always found the whole Monica = Carly narrative regressive, as I don't think shows comparing characters so heavily is ever a great idea, but she's actually worse than Carly was. Was it the Pollocks who had Leslie have a miscarriage?  Giving her a child, especially by rape, was not a good idea, but a part of me wishes they'd committed to it just to see what story it might have had in later years.
    • @janea4old Your detailed explanation and delving into the psychology and motivations is no doubt the opposite of what we will see onscreeen. As @ranger1rg stated we will get a few scenes and some sketchy explanations. Like the adoption of Aria, most of it will take place off screen.
    • I'm suddenly fearful that DAYS is going to pull a Flowers-for-Algernon stunt and Bo's progress will be reversed.  While @te. is stuck on Abe's tiny bedroom, I can't stop thinking of the size of Bo's huge hospital room.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy