Jump to content

Y&R Episodes Discussion, Week of October 26, 2009


Recommended Posts

  • Members

I have to disagree.

Victor was always a very flawed man when Bill Bell was around. Remember when Victor allowed everyone to think he was dead, so he could have some peace (and then be happy with his new soulmate, Hope)? He came back BECAUSE he learned that his family had moved on without him, had, in some cases, perhaps found some of the perspective they would not have had with him in their lives. I remember one of the big triggers for him being a bonding moment between young Nick and Jack, where Nick had clearly been able to put his father's death behind him. Never have I seen a better demonstration of the complex, sometimes downright cruel man Victor could be.

If that story played out now, Nikki would be in the gutter. Nick would be buying drugs at school. Newman Enterprises would be in freefall.

There is no longer any ambiguity allowed. Victor is awesome. That's it. End of story. Nikki and Ashley cannot exist without him. They fall apart. Yes, he treats them badly, but they want him to treat him badly. They need that. What are they on their own? It's the same with his children. They now live for him. They may tut-tut about his latest insane actions, but that's just Victor.

Victor has gone from being a very troubled man who is loved in spite of his flaws to a deity who is loved because of his flaws. I don't believe that's what Bill Bell had in mind. I can't imagine him writing a scene where you have eight or nine characters running around in hysterics because of a very mild hit piece. I thought the reaction to Restless was more balanced, although it's been a long time, I might be wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 375
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I just DO NOT SEE THIS.

Victor as deity?

Depicted as a moustache-twirler, with constant insults from Jack, and Gloria mocking his mumbling? Most of the town hates him.

I don't see them playing any sympathy or martyr beats.

Ashley and Nikki ABSOLUTELY can exist without him. Nikki is contemplating how she can let him into her life, without losing herself. Ashley has banished him...and even if she is still mentally ill, she won't take him back.

Truly, I don't see this at all. I see zero deification at all...if anything, they have turned decisively away from that during this most recent period.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yeah but these are insignificant characters to hit at the core of the Victor character in one way or another. Jack vs Victor, Gloria vs Victor, Billy vs Victor are the perfect characters to choose to depict antagonism when you're not trying to paint Victor in that bad of a light, each have their own crimes or wrongs or I guess the best way to to put it their own 'crosses to bare'. What would matter is if they wrote the character of Nick correctly, his daughter's (miraculously /quickly healed condition mind you) should make Nick damned mad. Should he be conflicted, I guess that part is within character but for a man who is still reeling from losing his first child, then a second, then a third with the woman he loves mind you where's the anger all of that should be placed on his father, even if some is displaced. I know Nick and Victor have a sick father/son debacle but it is only right IMO that Nick let alot of his issues out on his father, they won't go there God forbid EB is prolly not having any of it. Phyllis should be running down Victor with a car by now but nope, they want to go the Gloria and Jeffrey, Jack & Billy Abbot route. They antagonize these characters enough for the viewer to know that they will never be validated in a conflict with Victor

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Ashley is out of her mind. If she does exist without him, she will be doing so on the edge of a breakdown. That's what I take from the writing, where Victor is more than fair to her, lets her have the ranch, tries to calm her as she lashes out, and as her own daughter hates her. It makes her "I'm going to be independent" stance into a laugh.

The same for Nikki, she says she will hurt herself in the long run if she's with him, but she is still going to be with him. Katherine, who is the queen of GC according to the show, the wisest of all, has repeatedly told her that this is a relationship that should be, and that the way Victor treats her is just the way he loves her.

Gloria is a loser. Jack is a loser. Billy is a loser, albeit one we're supposed to like.

The characters we are supposed to respect, they always forgive and support Victor, no matter what he does. Traci, whose daughter died because of him, shared a moment of warmth with him at the christening he crashed. We also get a lot of displays of the power he has over his children - Victoria shames Phyllis from even speaking badly of the man who caused her daughter to suffer brain damage.

I think the undertone in most of the writing for Victor is, "He's not a nice man, but real men aren't nice. Fear him and admire him for what he is. And remember, someone else is always as bad, if not worse."

That's why we get these painful scenes of various characters saying, "Jack is as much to blame for Patty as Victor" and, "Victor took three bullets for Jack," and Victor saying, "This isn't the first time the Abbotts have come after me." And that's why, at the first sign of a mild article attacking him for his behavior, everyone from Sharon to Michael to Ashley were disgusted and heartsick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I have to disagree.

Everything in yesterday's US episode was geared towards making us feel sorry for the old codger. From the heart-stirring music swelling in the background as he "begged" Nikki to stay with him, to the way he would periodically clutch his heart and have little gasping spasms, to the overblown rhetoric of Billy/Jack's article.

MAB may have been writing Victor out at the time. But Victor is being cast as the hunted, being run out of town by the bully-boy Abbotts.

And ITA with classicmoment who said that Phyllis should be revving up her car to run him over right about now. Instead, it's like Summer's brain damage is being played down as being no biggie "ya, ya, definitely. Summer's doing GREAT at school!"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't like the insta-recovery of Summer either...although that could just be Phyllis being over-optimistic. Two weeks ago, the girl couldn't even speak two words.

I just don't see it! I haven't seen Victor's farewell eps, but I do imagine they'll be heart-swelling...but that's because of the real possibility that it represented EB's final moments.

My sense of Victor is that he is being written and played as vile...unapologetic, revenge-minded, reckless...and that the people in his environment recognize all of that. I also think--and this was the long-term genius of Bill Bell's creation--that at the same time he *used* to be shown as having redeemable characteristics, and even now, each of these people have enough of a history of love and happiness with him (if only for brief shining moments) that they are unable to just give him the "heave ho".

For me, with Victor (and I'm not excusing recent writing, which in my opinion has further villainized--not sanctified--him), what Y&R has always so masterfully shown was love could still be comingled with anger and hate. Even Jack and Victor, at their worst, could set aside some differences if they had a common purpose. (We haven't seen that, really, in a long while).

But apparently I have this warmed view of the show...not based in reality. :lol: I keep wondering what I'm missing.

I really don't see this elevation of Victor at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think that if they wanted to paint Victor as being reckless and out of control and vile, they wouldn't constantly use the "Jack is as bad" or "Victor saved Jack" disclaimers. They have worked tirelessly to make sure we know someone else always shares as much blame, or even more blame, and that at heart, Victor is a better man than those who hate him.

But we can agree to disagree.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

We sure can.

In the specific case of Patty, Jack is the ORIGINAL BLAME (and he never fully atoned for that...especially since he STILL used Mary Jane sexually 25 years later). Victor is the RECENT BLAME.

Both blames are legitimate. I don't think that "disclaims" Victor's guilt at all. And I feel Emily's "voice" has clearly shown that. Jack was vile...but it in no way absolves Victor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Mark I think in that sense it is a question of counter balance. Victor have the Newman and most others acting as if what he did for now is not that big of a deal, Jack villanous because none of that same kind of support is clearly show for that character. They are both wrong for contributions they have made to the whole thing but Victor's was worse, he took an already fragile woman and pushed her further on down the slope. These things should be a part of the resolution

Two of my favorite Y&R scenes ever it's up there with the Kimble shooting for me

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

^^ My other favorite scene is Kimble going into the trash compactor.

Victor is such a hypocrite. He has treated his family like crap over the years.

For all EB's complaints, he got a damn fine tribute today.

Billy makes me laugh. He is so gleeful about getting his revenge on the Newmans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Here's what bugs me. Gloria and Jeffrey have come off with NO BLAME in this whole thing, and they are the ones who kidnapped Patty in the first place, when she was holed up in a church and close to a surrender agreement. Of course, one could say that Victor is ultimately responsible there as well, because those two wouldn't be so desperate for money if Victor hadn't wrecked the bank in the Caymans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Ooooh...you're right.

Both Victor and Jack know about this, too. If they had properly turned Patty into the authorities at that time (or not interfered), Patty would have gotten the help she needed then and there....no Colleen kidnapping...no Victor shooting.

Hey, Fishwin haters, here's your chance! Glo-Jeff are the REAL criminals in need of punishment!

It is hard to give Victor ultimate responsibility for Glo-Jeff, since they were baaaaaaaaaad and selfish looooooooong before Victor entered the picture. If Victor hadn't blown their riches, they would have lost them some other foolish way. (On the other hand, Jill would never have invested so stupidly...for her, that was pure plot driven bullsh!t).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • That's what Julie Hanan Carruthers is doing for BTG at the new studio in Atlanta, but JHC is credited.
    • I remember when the whole Missy Reeves controversy started in 2012.  She tweeted support of a business that had made homophobic statements. Greg Rikaart (who was on Y&R back then) publicly called her out on it, but was willing to reach out and speak with her. Article here: https://greginhollywood.com/greg-rikaart-talks-about-his-twitter-war-with-fellow-soap-star-melissa-reeves-over-anti-gay-chick-fil-a-73139 That being said, ten years later, on DAYS, in 2022, when they had they double wedding of Leo/CraigWesley and Gwen/Xander, Jack and Jennifer came to the wedding.  At that time, Missy Reeves was only intermittently available for DAYS. Jennifer was living "in Boston" and Cady McClain and Missy were each intermittently appearing as Jennifer, on the specific occasions when the show required a Jennifer to appear. Missy wasn't on contract and she could have said no. But she chose to appear as Jennifer for the gay wedding of Greg Rikaart's character.   So... I mean... I would assume they reached a détente behind-the-scenes. Missy still has her belief system but there's that.
    • That was one of the best grandslam finals.  Alcaraz comes all the way back down 2 sets to 0, and three match points in the 3rd set, to win it in a 5th set tie-break.  And the quality of play was excellent - so many great shots.  What a battle!
    • Indeed. I may try to watch it in full sometime, but not anytime soon... Mark played Sean Baxter for a few episodes when Courtney married Andy. Burke was either on Broadway or at OLTL at that time, I suppose.
    • Well, Josh was a horndog. LOL Yep. It was one of the first really weird things Reva did with her PPD. She became obsessed with the idea that Dylan and Sam should get married. Sam was only 17, and needed her parent's permission. Reva helped them leave town so they could go to a neighboring state where Sam was old enough. Ross, Billy and Josh stopped them, then Sam went to India to try and persaude Justin. Reva followed her and didn't tell Josh she was going. While Reva was gone, Josh advertised for nannies, and Harley applied. He ended up hiring someone else. But when Reva returned, she hired Harley because (in her weird mental state) she wanted someone she could trust with the kids (because she feared Josh was trying to get rid of her and that Vanessa wanted the children.). After Reva starts treatment, she asks Harley to stay until she's stronger because she's good with the kids. At the party, Reva starts going off the rails, insulting Justin and Josh hauls her to a private dining room to ask WTF. Reva starts confronting him about the "affair" with Vanessa, and he realizes she is weird. He locks her in the dining room and frees Mindy and Van from the ladies room (where Reva has locked them in). Van starts telling him that Reva attacked her and needs help.  Reva escapes out the window of the dining room and goes back to the party, climbs onto a table and starts a striptease. Josh gets her to stop, takes her home and after filling Ed in, decides to go to the doctor the next day. Reva then takes off and spends days running around town, coming on to a guy she thinks is Billy, Billy, Hamp, Frank and Roger.  Roger takes her to his apartment and takes nude pictures of her, which he tries to blackmail Billy with. He wants the deed to the land the Towers is on in exchange for them. (Billy had been left the deed by a sweet old lady who lost her home in the 5th street fire. Roger had stolen the deed from her before she died. After Roger took those pics of Reva, she saw him hide them, and took an envelope from the hiding place. She didn't realize she'd taken the deed and not the pictures.)  Anyway, Billy and Vanessa trick Roger into burning the pictures, claim the deed and at the Towers opening reveal that Billy owns the land and therefore the Towers. That's what led to Roger and Alex's breakup and Roger and Mindy's affair. Mark Lewis was on ATWT? 1986 is not a good year, storywise. No bueno. Muy no bueno.
    • All the time they spent trying to make viewers feel sorry for Chad only for him to not even last that long. I wonder if they knew Richard Burgi was going so quickly. You're right about Josie replacing Cheryl. On paper, this should have made sense, given all the ties Josie had to the canvas, but I did prefer Cheryl. There was something very synthetic about Alexandra Wilson.  I suppose even if she did have some fans they were just so used to getting rid of people left and right, so she was more collateral damage. As you said above I do wonder what the plans were for Peggy Lazarus. I think AWHP mentioned her once telling Peter that Peggy Lazarus wasn't her real name. Maybe she would have been another Carl moll... Rebecca Hollen never did get her due in her soap roles.
    • So true...Hackney might have had a story on FC with Richard being an old lover of his, but reveals herself to be a Cartel member and blackmails Richard with something into doing her dirty work  LOL. But of course Richard had his hands full with the double trouble sisters Ms. Jones and Ms. Braxton that season.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Cat herself will be a stumbling block all her own as she vowed to Chad to stay away from him, thus redeeming her of her crime morally. Classic DAYS would have them gazing longingly at each other at Doug's Place or Blondie's, while Liz is serenading the room with a song aptly chosen to represent their feelings of emotional turmoil.
    • From what I just recently watched, they were setting her up to go into future stories. She was Emmy nomination worthy in the material I saw. If some viewers did not like her, the character could have been rehabilitated after that sick storyline. It feels like they destroyed a character for fun and then tossed her to the curb. Spencer had chemistry with everyone. I'm just retroactively angry on Spencer's behalf.  You're right about how Cheryl was often forgotten and pushed aside and I would take Cheryl over Josie. I think soaps need characters like Cheryl. Characters like Josie are way too common. Josie always got on my nerves.
    • CBS was back in third place in 1994/95. That was the season CBS lost NFL broadcasting rights which also cost them several established affiliates in major media markets. 1995 CBS was sold to Westinghouse and Les Moonves arrived. 1995/96 CBS was trying to be young and cool to compete with NBC and Fox, but it was an epic failure and CBS was once again in third place.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy