Jump to content

AMC: Daytime Confidential confirming production moving to LA


Recommended Posts

  • Members

I think it's short-sighted on both counts. The Price is Right is declining now, thanks to Bob Barker's retirement and the poor replacement Drew Carey. The View is a show all on its own universe and not easily replicated.

I also don't understand how they can shrink two soaps with such large casts and stories down to a half-hour. What I really hate is I know they probably won't even consider GH shrinking and that's the show which COULD shrink, because the show is completely hollowed.

OLTL, far from flawless, is the one soap on ABC which has managed to maintain some history, continuity, and quality, and identity. And their reward is a push out the door and probably cutting a half hour.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 502
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

So take a 40% paycut and move -- or take a 100% paycut and quit. Makes sense to me.

I am so proud to be an All My Children fan right about now (judgment coming so tune out if you're sensitive to it). Unlike those disloyal Guiding Light fans who only took over Lifetime's message boards and organized rallies and petitions AFTER THE FACT that the show had been canceled and given an expiration date, my fellow LOYAL All My Children fans speak nothing but gutter sshit about the show, predicting most of the cast will be eliminated and that the show will inevitably be canceled... all because it's switching coasts. THIS is the kind of gratitude and optimism the genre needs if it's ever to last. Not that pessimistic rallying and holding out hope.

Also... if I may weigh in on the Eden Riegel thing... WTF does she care about the Hair/Makeup team? She abandons them every chance she gets forever on the search for something better. :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

OLTL has to be under budget, every other week the studio is dark because they are so far ahead of schedule. Having said that, there is no reason for them to leave NYC. If AMC's current studio is 30% bigger then OLTL's, then they can easily set up permanent sets that are most frequently used and save even more money. AMC is (or at least was) a more brand able name, but it is going through one of the longest and most painful image crisis's I have ever seen. This change might be a good thing for AMC if, with this change, there are some behind the scene changes as well. As for OLTL, they maintain there cast, improve there studio space (historically complained about by actors for being a basement) and add space for more permanent sets and more outdoor scenes, which they have already started with great success, IMO. As far as I can see, ABCD is doing what it has to to keep its line-up intact. That includes all 3 shows. I don't see this as a ploy to slowly and painfully kill their daytime line-up. For God's sake, they own their shows. It's not like the other shows. They have no licensing fees, the shows aren't owned by major advertisers that can't be offended if they cancel one of their shows, especially in these HARD economic times. If ABCD didn't care about their line-up, they would pull the plug, plain and simple. Not to mention they replay the entire line-up for free on SoapNet. This is a good move, fiscally speaking, and should be looked at positively in my opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Thanks. I now get how turning OLTL and AMC into 30 minute shows would help slash the budget.

I take it back, my sense of humor is not weird. It is just different.

I don't think I agree. TPIR's struggles does not mean that other new game shows will fail. Game shows can have a nice loyal audience. Talk shows can have success for a few years before tanking. I can't blame ABC and CBS for experimenting. ABC especially is trying to save their shows. I think that it is futile, but you never know, something good could happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

GOD, I wish my lovely DaytimeFan was still around. He'd know what's up.

Eh. Daytime is dying across the board. I hate to be one of those doom-and-gloomers, but I just can't shake the dull, lifeless feeling that I'm getting from daytime. This is a little pocket of TV programming that once was a lively, thriving world of its own that didn't need to rely on primetime to survive. Daytime had its own group of stars that were famous just for being in daytime, from the soap actors and actresses to the game show hosts and panelists, to the talk show hosts, and so on. It's sad, but it's whatever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

R, You and I will never agree on the ER situation but look at it this way: if you had her eyebrows you'd care about hair and makeup too. ;)

While I have to admit I don't care that much about who stays or goes, I must say that I hate, hate, HATE seeing any show leave NYC. I love that city and I hate watching it lose more of the TV/film business especially to LA and the bankrupt state of California. I just loathe that whole West coast "feel" in daytime, primetime, movies all of it. I'm a theatre girl.

I miss him too. Where is he? Did he go into voluntary exile? Help us DaytimeFan. You're our only hope.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Seriously, I don't understand why any celebrity twitters. The whole thing seems like mind regurgitation, and everything they say is interpreted and hidden meanings are extrapolated. I just don't understand what the upside is for those who choose to open themselves up that way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I keep thinking about the persistent trend of eroticizing mental illness on Guiding Light. Sonni and Annie were never more compelling, or more attractive to the show, than when they were manic. It played into a recurring theme: strong women undone by their unhinged reaction to sex. The writers were likely inspired by Basic Instinct and the broader wave of neo-noir films in the late '80s and early '90s, where female sexuality was often equated with instability. The result was a crude portrayal, not just of mental illness, but of womanhood itself. Both Sonni and Annie were introduced as sharp, capable women, brought in specifically as formidable antagonists to Reva. They were logical and composed, standing in contrast to Reva’s emotional volatility. That difference made them threatening, but not especially “sexy”—until desire became their undoing. In a very male fantasy, their strength unraveled the moment they slept with Joshua. As soon as they got a taste of Lewis lovin’, they spiraled into scheming lunatics, willing to torch everything to hold on to him. It was part of a larger trend in the culture. Fatal Attraction, Single White Female, and The Hand That Rocks the Cradle all traded on the idea that female desire was dangerous, barely held in check, and always teetering on the edge of madness. Looking back, it's a pretty grim trope. And while it's not completely vanished, I'm grateful we don't see it quite as often today.
    • Elements of it were silly, but it was a small price to pay to get Zas back. I should say there's a difference between in town and out of town returns. It's understandable for Roger to skulk around town in a bad wig and clown suit when he's in Springfield and running the risk of bumping in to people he knows.  Taking us out of town to find someone always has a short shelf life. Then it usually becomes about another character knowing X is alive but determined to keep them out of Springfield. Like Alan discovering Amish Reva. I don't know how long it went on, but it was probably twice as long as necessary.
    • Elizabeth Dennehy complained on the Locher Room about how ridiculous so much of the writing was for Roger's return. She laughed at so much of Roger's antics and how it was hard for her to take them seriously. Probably another reason she was fired as she didn't play the game.  
    • Only thing I enjoyed was Abby / Olivia, etc., and the addiction storyline. Otherwise, I could do without the season.
    • Right? Vanessa had a ball gown for every occasion.
    • Roger's return storyline may have been silly but Roger's return was what lead to GL's last golden era.  It was the combination of Roger's return and Robert Calhoun becoming EP that got GL to finally hit it's stride after some really bad years. It will always disappoint me that the ratings during Robert Calhoun's run didn't reflect the quality of the show.
    • He also gave some of the best episodes, like the episodes surrounding Doug's death. The problem with Days was that Ron had a horrible vision from he top. I don't feel the same for MVJ and nothing that has happened in all these months suggests she doesn't have a handle on the show. Now if it becomes an issue I'll acknowledge it, but I'm not seeing it so far.
    • Jean Hackney was awful and that lead to Ben's exit story which sucked. I liked Ben/Val together. Val's love for Ben was that of a grown woman moving on with her life and Ben's love for Val made him willingly decide to raise another man's children as his own.
    • It wasn't just a GL thing, it was an 80s thing. Opulent party scenes on soaps were very big back then. Even in regular episodes where people are just going to dinner they're dressed up like they're going to see royalty.
    • Just started the May 27 episode and first thing I see is that Willow got an ugly haircut since hte last time i watched   I dont have the context for how everthing went down but I know its all Lulu's fault which make her a bish for what she did to Gio
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy